Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oakland Co

Court

Oakland Co

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2026-03-27
Type Fh
Docket 51 entries

Parties

Plaintiff People
Defendant Xu Wenli
Photo of Hon. MARTHA D. ANDERSON

Judge

Hon. MARTHA D. ANDERSON

Oakland County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DISTRICT COURT RETURN FILED
  2. DEF WAIVED PHYSICAL PRESENCE
  3. INTERPRETER (MANDARIN) STEPHANIE MANN
  4. DEFENSE MOTION TO AMEND BOND ORDER;GPS TETHER/HOME
  5. CONFINEMENT-DENIED.
  6. ORDER FILED DENY MTN AMD BOND
  7. BOND REC/POSTED BY:DFT $2500 10% 52-1
  8. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  9. PEOPLES RESP FILED IN OPP TO MTN AMD BOND
  10. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  11. ARRAIGNMENT BY MAIL
  12. DATE SET FOR PRETRIAL ON 04302026 08 30 AM Y
  13. PROCEEDING TO BE HELD IN-PERSON
  14. MOTION FILED AMD BOND/NOH/POS/DFT
  15. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  16. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 04152026 JUDGE 10
  17. RECORD OF ARRAIGNMENT FILED
  18. PROPOSED ORDER FILED
  19. PLF DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY FILED
  20. GEN INFO FILED
  21. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  22. NOTICE FROM COURT ADMINISTRATOR FILED
  23. PROSECUTORS ORDER 26-16171
  24. ARRESTING AGENCY: AUBURN HILLS POLICE DEPT.
  25. 52/1 DISTRICT COURT 26-000337
  26. CENTRAL TRACT 63-26-016171-01
  27. STATE ID NOT AVAILABLE
  28. DATE OF OFFENSE 01/14/26
  29. ARRAIGNMENT - THU, 04092026 AT 0830AM
  30. EXAM FOR 03/26/26 HAD
  31. BIRTH YEAR - 68
  32. 750.159I1 CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE - CONDUCT
  33. BOUND OVER AS CHARGED
  34. 750.452 KEEPING HOUSE OF ILL FAME
  35. BOUND OVER AS CHARGED
  36. 750.452 KEEPING HOUSE OF ILL FAME
  37. BOUND OVER AS CHARGED
  38. HIV TEST REQUIRED UPON CONVICTION
  39. CONDITIONS ON BOND
  40. BOND POSTED BY: DEFENDANT
  41. ADDRESS: 5222 SANDLEWOOD DRIVE
  42. COMMERCE TOWNSHI MI 48382
  43. TYPE: CASH/SURETY/10%
  44. AMOUNT: $25,000
  45. DATE SET FOR ARRAIGNMEN ON 04092026 08 30 AM Y
  46. PROCEEDING TO BE HELD IN-PERSON
  47. NTC CT ADMN FILED
  48. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  49. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  50. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  51. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more