Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oakland Co

Court

Oakland Co

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-04-04
Type Ni
Docket 32 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Riley Deanna
Defendant None|Kahn David Samuel|Kahn Bassheva
Photo of Hon. MARTHA D. ANDERSON

Judge

Hon. MARTHA D. ANDERSON

Oakland County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. COMPLAINT FILED /JD
  2. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  3. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  4. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  5. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  6. APPEARANCE FILED POS/DFT
  7. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  8. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  9. SUB ATTY/PROP FILED
  10. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  11. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  12. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  13. EARLY SCH CONF HELD VIA ZOOM; OFF RECORD.
  14. COURT TO ISSUE SCH ORDER
  15. DATE SET FOR SETTL CONF ON 04162026 01 30 PM Y 10
  16. PROCEEDING TO BE HELD IN-PERSON
  17. DATE SET FOR TRIAL ON 05112026 08 30 AM Y 10
  18. PROCEEDING TO BE HELD IN-PERSON
  19. ORDER FILED PRETRIAL
  20. SCHEDULING ORDER FILED
  21. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  22. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  23. BYPASS SCHEDULING ORDER
  24. DATE SET FOR E SCHED C ON 06202025 10 30 AM Y 10
  25. PROCEEDING TO BE HELD REMOTELY BY ZOOM
  26. JURY DEMAND FILED RELIANCE/POS/DFT
  27. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED /AFM/POS/DFT
  28. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  29. ORDER FILED RE SHOW CAUSE
  30. P/S ON SUMMONS FILED 04/15/25
  31. P/S ON SUMMONS FILED 04/15/25
  32. SUMMONS ISSUED (2)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more