Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-12-02
Status Open
Type Divorce Without Children (3 An)|Spouses Without Minor Children (and Not Pregnant) Agree On All Issues To End Marriage
Docket 15 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Peterkin, Matthew Scott
Defendant Peterkin, Angela Sue
Photo of Hon. Nesbett David A

Judge

Hon. Nesbett David A

Aleutians East Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Initial Judicial Assignment
  2. Uncontested Complaint for Divorce Receipt: 2247591 Date: 12/02/2024
  3. LODGED: VS-401 Certificate of Absolute Divorce or Dissolution
  4. Domestic Relations Procedural Order and Assignment
  5. Information Sheet - Confidential Document per Civil Rule 90.1(f)(1)
  6. Property and Debt Worksheet Matthew Scott Peterkin (Plaintiff); Angela Sue Peterkin (Defendant);
  7. Joint Motion to Put Settlement on the Record Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Matthew Scott Peterkin (Plaintiff); Angela Sue Peterkin (Defendant); Filing Party: Peterkin, Matthew Scott; Peterkin, Angela Sue Case Motion #1
  8. Proposed Findings of Fact Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Matthew Scott Peterkin (Plaintiff); Angela Sue Peterkin (Defendant); Filing Party: Peterkin, Matthew Scott; Peterkin, Angela Sue Case Motion #2
  9. Proposed Divorce Decree Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Matthew Scott Peterkin (Plaintiff); Angela Sue Peterkin (Defendant); Filing Party: Peterkin, Matthew Scott; Peterkin, Angela Sue Case Motion #3
  10. Proposed Qualified Domestic Relations Order (Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Supplemental Pension Plan) - Lacks Unredacted Copy c/s 12-11-24 Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Peterkin, Matthew Scott; Peterkin, Angela Sue Case Motion #4
  11. Proposed Qualified Domestic Relations Order (Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan) - Lacks Unredacted Copy c/s 12-11-24 Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Matthew Scott Peterkin (Plaintiff); Angela Sue Peterkin (Defendant); Filing Party: Peterkin, Matthew Scott; Peterkin, Angela Sue Case Motion #5
  12. Proposed Qualified Domestic Relations Order (Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund) - Lacks Unredacted Copy c/s 12-11-24 Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Matthew Scott Peterkin (Plaintiff); Angela Sue Peterkin (Defendant); Filing Party: Peterkin, Matthew Scott; Peterkin, Angela Sue Case Motion #6
  13. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: Civil Deficiency Memo (11/23) Sent on: 12/11/2024 14:05:35.78
  14. Notice of Deficient Filing(s) mailed re: ACTION NEEDED TO CORRECT FILING Re: Qualified Domestic Relations Orders Filed on 12-2-24 [Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan, Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Supplemental Pension Plan and Sheet Metal Workers’ National Pension Fund] You have recently submitted documents related to the above case. These documents are either incomplete or do not follow correct procedures. Please do the following: 1 The filed document did not contain a signature or an original signature, so you must sign the document and refile. Civil Rule 11. 1 Submit a copy of the proposed original Qualified Domestic Relations Order’s (QDRO) with all social security numbers. Civil Rule 90.1(g). Domestic Relations Deficiency Memo (11/23) Sent on: 12/11/2024 14:15:32.36
  15. Scheduling Notice for Early Resolution Hearing

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more