Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-07
Status INACTIVE
Type Miscellaneous Other
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Marija Lautas
Defendant Integrity Energy Ltd
Photo of Hon. Deborah M Turner

Judge

Hon. Deborah M Turner

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58031399) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: TAUREAN J. SHATTUCK [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58031398) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: TAUREAN J. SHATTUCK [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(58031397) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: THOMAS L BRUNN [email protected]
  5. MEDIATION HEARING HELD. ALL PARTIES APPEARED. THE PARTIES REACHED AN AGREEMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE, FILED 08/07/2025, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. DISCOVERY CUT-OFF EXTENDED TO 09/05/2025. ALL OTHER DATES REMAIN AS SCHEDULED. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE
  8. MEDIATION SET FOR 08/29/2025 AT 09:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  9. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY PHONE HELD 04/08/2025. ALL PARTIES APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. THE PARTIES AGREED TO THE FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE: DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 08/06/2025 PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 10/01/2025 DEFENDANT'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 12/01/2025 THE PARTIES ARE ENCOURAGED TO WORK TOGETHER FOR DISCOVERY DISPUTES. IF DISCOVERY DISPUTES REMAIN, THE PARTIES ARE TO CONTACT THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8577 BEFORE FILING ANY MOTIONS TO COMPEL AND A HEARING MAY BE SCHEDULED. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DUE ON OR BEFORE 12/01/2025. RESPONSES DUE IN 28 DAYS AND REPLIES DUE IN 7 DAYS DUE PER CIVIL RULE 6. PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO DELIVER A HARD COPY OF ALL MOTIONS/BRIEFS EXCEEDING 20 PAGES IN LENGTH, INCLUSIVE OF EXHIBITS, TO THE COURT. CAPTIONED CASE IS HEREBY REFERRED TO MEDIATION WITH THE COURT MEDIATOR. MEDIATION TO COMMENCE AFTER 08/01/2025 AND BE CONCLUDED BY 09/01/2025. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 09/22/2025 AT 09:30 AM. TO DISCUSS CASE STATUS. PLAINTIFF TO INITIATE CALL WITH ALL PARTIES THEN CONTACT THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8577. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 03/10/2026 AT 02:00 PM. PARTIES TO SERVE AND FILE PRETRIAL STATEMENT NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE FINAL PRETRIAL. ALL PARTIES AND CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVES MUST BE PRESENT AT THE FINAL PRETRIAL WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY. IF THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS AN INSURANCE COMPANY, CORPORATION, COMMON CARRIER, OR OTHER ARTIFICIAL ENTITY, THEN THE CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE THE PERSON WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER INTO A BINDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO ALL CLAIMS. FAILURE TO APPEAR BY ANY PARTY/REPRESENTATIVE WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY SHALL CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER AND MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, AN AWARD OF COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES INCURRED BY THE OTHER PARTIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONFERENCE, AS WELL AS OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS AGAINST THE NONCOMPLYING PARTY AND/OR COUNSEL. IN ADDITION, THE COURT WILL SCHEDULE A HEARING WHICH SAID PARTY/REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ATTEND PERSONALLY AND SHOW CAUSE WHY S/HE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT. TRIAL BY JURY SET FOR 04/06/2026 AT 09:00 AM. PARTIES SHALL SUBMIT TRIAL BRIEFS, MOTIONS IN LIMINE, JURY INTERROGATORIES AND JURY INSTRUCTIONS, NO LATER THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. FAILURE TO SUBMIT A JURY INSTRUCTION ON AN ISSUE MAY RESULT IN WAIVER OF THE INSTRUCTION. TRIAL BRIEFS ARE TO INCLUDE: A STATEMENT OF THE FACTS; A DISCUSSION OF THE CONTROLLING LAW; ANY STIPULATIONS; WITNESS LIST ALONG WITH A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE TESTIMONY OF EACH WITNESS; EXHIBIT LIST CONTAINING A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH EXHIBIT. EACH PARTY SHALL INCLUDE THE CURRICULUM VITAE OF ANY EXPERT THAT MAY BE CALLED TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL. WITNESSES OR EXHIBITS NOT LISTED IN THE TRIAL BRIEF SHALL NOT TESTIFY OR BE INTRODUCED AT TRIAL ABSENT A SHOWING OF GOOD CAUSE. OPPOSING BRIEFS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO CONFER WITH ONE ANOTHER WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED JURY INTERROGATORIES/INSTRUCTIONS, WITH A VIEW TO REACHING AGREEMENT ON INTERROGATORIES/INSTRUCTIONS TO BE REQUESTED. THE INTERROGATORIES/INSTRUCTIONS AGREED UPON BY ALL COUNSEL SHALL BE IDENTIFIED. DISPUTED INTERROGATORIES/INSTRUCTIONS SHALL LIKEWISE BE IDENTIFIED ALONG WITH SEPARATE CITATION TO LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR EACH. COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT A COPY OF THE PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS, INTERROGATORIES AND VERDICT FORMS ARE EMAILED IN WORD FORMAT TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT [email protected] AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED TRIAL DATE. FAILURE OF A PARTY TO PROVIDE A PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION FOR AN ISSUE UPON WHICH THEY BEAR THE BURDEN OF PROOF AT TRIAL MAY RESULT IN WAIVER OF THAT ISSUE AT TRIAL. IF TESTIMONY IS TO BE PRESENTED BY PREVIOUSLY VIDEOTAPED TESTIMONY, ANY PARTY PRESENTING OBJECTIONS MUST PRESENT A TRANSCRIPT OF THE TESTIMONY AND A LOG OF OBJECTIONS AT LEAST (14) DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL UNLESS GOOD CAUSE IS SHOWN. THE OBJECTION LOG SHOULD STATE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE OBJECTION AND ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT. RESPONSES TO THE OBJECTION LOG ARE DUE (7) DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. EXHIBITS SHALL BE BOUND AND MARKED BEFORE TRIAL AND SUBMITTED TO THE COURT PRIOR TO TRIAL. ALL POSSIBLE STIPULATIONS ARE TO BE MADE PRIOR TO TRIAL. PARTIES SHALL PREPARE A STIPULATED STATEMENT OF THE CASE FOR THE COURT TO READ TO THE JURY PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 47(A). A PRE-TRIAL MOTION HEARING MAY BE SCHEDULED BY THE COURT. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS OR DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY D1 INTEGRITY ENERGY LTD ATTORNEY THOMAS L BRUNN 0042453 REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING UNDER CIV.R. 26(F)
  11. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/08/2025 AT 09:30 AM. PLAINTIFF TO INITIATE CALL WITH ALL PARTIES AND THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT (216) 443-8577. ANY ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY WHO IS NOT AVAILABLE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED HIS/HER PARTICIPATION AND TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE CASE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EACH PARTY TO ENSURE THE CLERK OF COURT'S OFFICE LISTS A CORRECT PHONE NUMBER FOR THAT PARTY. PARTIES SHOULD NOT WAIT FOR THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE BEGINNING TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. ANSWER FILED BY D1 INTEGRITY ENERGY LTD ATTORNEY THOMAS L BRUNN 0042453 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55776319 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/13/2025 INTEGRITY ENERGY LTD PROCESSED BY COC 01/22/2025.
  14. USPS RECEIPT NO. 55776318 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/13/2025 INTEGRITY ENERGY LTD PROCESSED BY COC 01/22/2025.
  15. WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS RETURNED SIGNED ON 01/09/2025 WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS FOR DEFENDANT INTEGRITY ENERGY LTD
  16. SUMS COMPLAINT(55776319) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: INTEGRITY ENERGY LTD 5711 GRANT AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44105
  17. SUMS COMPLAINT(55776318) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: INTEGRITY ENERGY LTD C/O SEAN P. ALLEN REGISTERED AGENT 323 WEST LAKESIDE AVENUE SUITE 210 CLEVELAND, OH 44113-0000
  18. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. WRIT FEE
  20. WRIT FEE
  21. JUDGE DEBORAH M TURNER ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  22. LEGAL RESEARCH
  23. LEGAL NEWS
  24. LEGAL AID
  25. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  26. COMPUTER FEE
  27. CLERK'S FEE
  28. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TAUREAN J. SHATTUCK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more