Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oakland Co

Court

Oakland Co

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-12
Type Nm
Docket 62 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Adamo Judith A|Adamo Ronald
Defendant Law Offices Of Harry Steven El|Ellman Harry S
Photo of Hon. MARTHA D. ANDERSON

Judge

Hon. MARTHA D. ANDERSON

Oakland County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE REASSIGNED FROM JDG VALENTINE TO JDG ANDERSON
  2. FINAL DISP-DISMISS
  3. OPINION FILED & ORD GRANT DFT MTN SUM DISP
  4. ZOOM HEARING
  5. DEFENSE MOTION SD - ISSUE OPINION
  6. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  7. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  8. BRIEF FILED REPLY/SUPT OF DFT MTN SUM DISP/POS/DFT
  9. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  10. RESPONSE FILED TO DFT MTN SUM DISP/BRF/POS/PLF
  11. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  12. ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT FILED STP/DFT MTN SUM DISP
  13. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  14. REQUEST FILED APP/PLFS
  15. ORDER FILED GRNT MTN WDRAW PLF COUNSEL
  16. APPEARANCE FILED PLFS
  17. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  18. ZOOM HEARING
  19. MOTION WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL - GRANTED
  20. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  21. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 04132022 JUDGE 10
  22. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 04202022 JUDGE 10
  23. MOTION FILED WITHDRAW ATTY/BRF/NOH/POS/PLF
  24. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  25. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 04272022 JUDGE 10
  26. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  27. MOTION FILED SUM DISP/BRF/NOH/POS/DFTS
  28. SCHEDULING ORDER FILED
  29. SCHEDULING ORDER WRITTEN
  30. 07/08/2022 EXPERT DATE.
  31. 09/08/2022 CASE EVALUATION DATE.
  32. 07/12/2022 WITNESS DATE.
  33. 10/10/2022 MOTION DATE.
  34. 08/11/2022 DISCOVERY DATE.
  35. 10/10/2022 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
  36. 12/08/2022 TRIAL DATE.
  37. DATE SET FOR PRETRIAL ON 10102022 08 30 AM
  38. DATE SET FOR TRIAL ON 12082022 08 30 AM
  39. STIP/ORD FILED RE RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
  40. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  41. ZOOM HEARING
  42. MOTION WTHDRW AS COUNSEL FOR P - DENIED W/O PR
  43. CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN LAWFIRM & PLF FILED/PLF
  44. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  45. CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN LAW FIRM & PLF FILED/PLF
  46. LETTER FILED RE LEGAL REPRESENTATION/PLF
  47. EMAIL BETWEEN LAW FIRM & PLF FILED/PLF
  48. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  49. REBUTTAL COMMENTS FILED/RON ADAMO
  50. REBUTTAL COMMENTS FILED/RON ADAMO
  51. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 02162022 JUDGE 10
  52. REPLY FILED TO W/DRAW OF ATTY/PLF
  53. ANSWER FILED TO MTN TO W/DRAW/PLF
  54. LETTER FILED RE EMAILS/RONALD ADAMO
  55. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  56. ADDITIONAL INFO ON MTN FILED/PLF
  57. APPEARANCE FILED DFTS/POS
  58. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  59. APPEARANCE FILED /POS/DFT
  60. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  61. MOTION FILED WDRAW AS PLF CNSL/BRF/NOH/POS/CASTMORE
  62. COMPLAINT FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more