Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- RESPONSE - RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE
- COMPLAINT
- ORDER FILED
- REGULAR AFFIDAVIT
- REQUEST FOR SERVICE HAYES CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP RAM OF GAINESVILLE
- SUMMONS
- ANSWER
- MOTION FILED
- SHERIFF'S RETURN OF SERVICE
- ANSWER
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
- RESPONSE
- ORDER FILED
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
- MOTION FILED
- RESPONSE
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
- MOTION FILED
- RESPONSE
- ORDER FILED
- MOTION FILED
- MOTION FILED
- MOTION FILED
- RESPONSE
- NOTICE
- MOTION FILED
- STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACT
- ORDER FILED
- CASE DISPOSITION FORM
- ORDER FILED
- MOTION FILED
- RESPONSE
- MOTION FILED
- MOTION FILED
- REGULAR AFFIDAVIT
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE - BENSON
- ORDER FILED - ORDER DENYING PLTF'S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE
- RULE NISI - JULY 9, 2025 9:00 AM CT RM 202
- MOTION FILED-PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND OBJECTION TO ORDER DENYING DISQUALIFICATION DUE TO NONCOMPLIANCE WITH O.C.G.A. 45-4-1 AND 45-4-30
- ORDER FILED - ORDER GRANTING DEF'S MOTION FOR ATTY'S FEES & ENTERING JUDGMENT
- NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED-RITTER TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
- NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED-AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL
- EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT AND POTENTIAL GARNISHMENT
- MOTION FILED - MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION DUE TO NO JUDICIAL BOND
- RESPONSE - DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In