Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-12-04
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract Business
Docket 26 entries

Parties

Plaintiff R. W. Sidley, Inc.
Defendant Raymond Ciacchi Aka: / Ohio Concrete Inc.
Photo of Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Judge

Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54415813) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CORY J. MARTINSON [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54415812) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SUSAN HARTMAN MUSKA [email protected]
  4. PURSUANT TO PRIOR ENTRY OF THE COURT, CASE CLOSED. COURT COST ASSESSED AS DIRECTED. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 08/14/2024 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  6. DISMISSAL ENTRY. O.S.J. FINAL. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 1/17/2024, IS DENIED GIVEN THE PARTIES' STIPULATIONS FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD. PLAINTIFF MAY REFILE THE MOTION AS NECESSARY. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. NOTICE FILED BY D1 RAYMOND CIACCHI ATTORNEY CORY J. MARTINSON 0095586 NOTICE OF SECOND STIPULATED LEAVE TO PLEAD
  9. STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD FILED NOTICE OF STIPULATED LEAVE TO PLEAD
  10. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED D1 RAYMOND CIACCHI CORY J. MARTINSON 0095586. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  11. DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 3/14/2024 AT 11:00 A.M. ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR IN PERSON. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO BRING IN THE FOLLOWING: 1. PROOF OF SERVICE; 2. CLIENT'S AFFIDAVIT AND PROOF OF DAMAGES; 3. PREPARED JUDGMENT ENTRY; 4. COPY OF LETTER TO DEFENDANT(S) RE HEARING AND THAT JUDGMENT MAY BE RENDERED. PLAINTIFF TO HAVE FILED ITS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO DEFAULT HEARING. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 R. W. SIDLEY, INC. ATTORNEY SUSAN HARTMAN MUSKA 0019770 PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT (IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT)
  13. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT SUPPORTED BY AFFIDAVIT 05/14/2024 - DENIED
  14. USPS RECEIPT NO. 52547791 DELIVERED BY USPS 12/14/2023 CIACCHI/RAYMOND/ PROCESSED BY COC 12/27/2023.
  15. SUMS COMPLAINT(52547791) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RAYMOND CIACCHI 1350 GRANGER RD BROOKLYN HEIGHTS, OH 44131
  16. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. WRIT FEE
  18. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 R. W. SIDLEY, INC. ATTORNEY SUSAN HARTMAN MUSKA 0019770 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  19. JUDGE KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  20. LEGAL RESEARCH
  21. LEGAL NEWS
  22. LEGAL AID
  23. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  24. COMPUTER FEE
  25. CLERK'S FEE
  26. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID SUSAN HARTMAN MUSKA

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more