Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-10-11
Status INACTIVE
Type Miscellaneous Other
Docket 24 entries

Parties

Plaintiff City Of Cleveland Heights, Ohio C/o Regional Income Tax Agency
Defendant Willie J. Wright
Photo of Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Judge

Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. REFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO STACIE HACKEL SNOW
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52684910) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: WILLIE J. WRIGHT 3150 WHITETHORN ROAD CLEVELAND HEGIHTS, OH 44118
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52684909) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRITTANY D. CARABALLO [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52684908) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: AMBER E GREENLEAF DUBER [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52684907) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: STACIE HACKEL SNOW [email protected]
  7. CASE CALLED FOR DEFAULT HEARING ON 12/27/2023. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. DEFENDANT, HAVING BEEN DULY SERVED WITH PROCESS, FAILED TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE APPEAR IN THIS ACTION. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 12/04/2023, IS GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT WILLIE J. WRIGHT IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,619.00, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT, ALONG WITH COLLECTIONS COSTS AUTHORIZED BY R.C. 718.27, PLUS COSTS OF THIS ACTION. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CITY OF CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OHIO ATTORNEY STACIE HACKEL SNOW 0080242 AFFIDAVIT OF MILITARY STATUS
  9. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CITY OF CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OHIO ATTORNEY STACIE HACKEL SNOW 0080242 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  10. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 CITY OF CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OHIO ATTORNEY STACIE HACKEL SNOW 0080242 AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES
  11. THE COURT IS IN RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 12/04/2023. THE DOCKET REFLECTS THAT SERVICE HAS BEEN PERFECTED, BUT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIVIL RULES. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 12/27/2023 AT 10:00 AM. THE DEFAULT HEARING SHALL BE HELD BY PHONE. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IS REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT BY PHONE. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 216-443-8591 AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE, TIME AND CONFERENCE CALL DIRECTIONS. BEFORE HEARING DATE, PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES AND MILITARY SERVICE, A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY, AND A COPY OF THE CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO DEFENDANT ADVISING OF THE DATE, TIME, AND LOCATION OF THE HEARING. NOTIFICATION SHALL BE MADE VIA CERTIFIED MAIL TO BE SENT NO LATER THAN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE AFOREMENTIONED DOCUMENTS ON OR BEFORE THE HEARING DATE MAY RESULT IN A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B). THE FAILURE OF DEFENDANT(S) TO APPEAR WILL RESULT IN A DEFAULT JUDGMENT. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B). THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT CITY OF CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OHIO'S, MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 12/28/2023 - GRANTED
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 52136112 DELIVERED BY USPS 10/20/2023 WRIGHT/WILLIE/J. PROCESSED BY COC 10/25/2023.
  14. SUMS COMPLAINT(52136112) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: WILLIE J. WRIGHT 3150 WHITETHORN ROAD CLEVELAND HEGIHTS, OH 44118
  15. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. WRIT FEE
  17. JUDGE MICHAEL J RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  18. LEGAL RESEARCH
  19. LEGAL NEWS
  20. LEGAL AID
  21. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  22. COMPUTER FEE
  23. CLERK'S FEE
  24. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID STACIE HACKEL SNOW

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more