Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-08-11
Status INACTIVE
Type Consumer Debt
Docket 23 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Discover Bank
Defendant Lakesha Miller
Photo of Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Judge

Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52332137) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: LAKESHA MILLER 14902 KREMS AVE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52332136) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52332135) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID MULLEN [email protected]
  5. BY AND THROUGH THE NOTICE OF DISMISSAL FILED 11/07/2023, THIS MATTER IS VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(A). COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. NOTICE FILED BY P1 DISCOVER BANK ATTORNEY DAVID MULLEN 0089053 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
  7. THE DOCKET REFLECTS GOOD SERVICE ON DEFENDANT AND THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO FILE AN ANSWER. PLAINTIFF IS TO FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHIN 60 DAYS OF JOURNALIZATION OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 41(B)(1). PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THE FOLLOWING: (1) THE CONTRACT(S), ASSIGNMENT(S), ACCOUNT STATEMENT(S), OR WRITTEN INSTRUMENT(S) UPON WHICH PLAINTIFF SEEKS JUDGMENT; (2) AN AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT; (3) AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES; (4) A MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IF APPLICABLE; AND (5) A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY. DEFAULT HEARING TO BE SCHEDULED UPON RECEIPT OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. SUMS COMPLAINT(51764246) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: LAKESHA MILLER 14902 KREMS AVE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137 ANSWER DATE: 10/03/2023
  9. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  10. WRIT FEE
  11. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED VIA ORDINARY MAIL
  12. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 51375622 RETURNED 8/31/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT MILLER/LAKESHA / - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  13. SUMS COMPLAINT(51375622) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: LAKESHA MILLER 14902 KREMS AVE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137
  14. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  15. WRIT FEE
  16. JUDGE MICHAEL J RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  17. LEGAL RESEARCH
  18. LEGAL NEWS
  19. LEGAL AID
  20. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  21. COMPUTER FEE
  22. CLERK'S FEE
  23. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID MULLEN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more