Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-03-15
Status INACTIVE
Type Commercial Docket
Docket 52 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Sky Quest Llc
Defendant Csm Consultants, Llc|Ryan Clark
Photo of Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Judge

Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT CIV.R. 60(A), FILED 09/26/2023, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. NUNC PRO TUNC ENTRY AS OF FOR JOURNAL ENTRY DATED 07/26/2023 (DOCKET CODE #153468635) . THE COURT HEREBY CORRECTS THE CLERICAL ERROR OMITTING DEFENDANT RYAN CLARK FROM THE FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY. JOURNAL ENTRY DATED 07/26/2023 TO BE UPDATED TO INCLUDE DEFENDANT RYAN CLARK AS FOLLOWS: "CASE CALLED FOR PRE-TRIAL. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF APPEARED; NEITHER DEFENDANTS NOR COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS APPEARED. PLAINTIFF MOVED ORALLY FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. A HEARING WAS HELD. UPON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE COURT FINDS THAT PROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANTS HAS BEEN OBTAINED, THAT DEFENDANTS HAVE FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED UNDER CIV.R. 12, AND THAT PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS BELOW IN PLAINTIFF'S FAVOR AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS IN DEFAULT. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 55, DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY RENDERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANT CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC, AND DEFENDANT RYAN CLARK, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,682.68. DEFENDANTS TO PAY POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST AT THE APPLICABLE STATUTORY RATE OF 5% FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT, PLUS COSTS OF THIS ACTION. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). ASSIGNED JUDGE UNAVAILABLE, THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE BRENDAN J SHEEHAN." THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  3. OTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT $30 FILED BY ROBERT C WENTZ (0042072) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT CIV.R. 60(A) 10/05/2023 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  4. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ROBERT C WENTZ
  5. EFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO ROBERT C WENTZ
  6. ASE CALLED FOR PRE-TRIAL. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF APPEARED; NEITHER DEFENDANTS NOR COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS APPEARED. PLAINTIFF MOVED ORALLY FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. A HEARING WAS HELD. UPON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE COURT FINDS THAT PROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANTS HAS BEEN OBTAINED, THAT DEFENDANTS HAVE FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED UNDER CIV.R. 12, AND THAT PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS BELOW IN PLAINTIFF'S FAVOR AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS IN DEFAULT. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 55, DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY RENDERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC, AND, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,682.68. DEFENDANTS TO PAY POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST AT THE APPLICABLE STATUTORY RATE OF 5% FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT, PLUS COSTS OF THIS ACTION. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). ASSIGNED JUDGE UNAVAILABLE, THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE BRENDAN J SHEEHAN. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. RETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 07/26/2023 AT 10:30 AM. PRE-TRIAL WILL BE HELD BY TELEPHONE UNLESS OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE AT LEAST ONE WEEK IN ADVANCE. ALL PARTIES ARE TO JOIN ONE LINE AND THEN CALL THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT 216.443.8591 AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING OR PROVIDE A CONFERENCE NUMBER TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY IN ADVANCE. IF THE CALL IS UNANSWERED, THE PARTIES SHOULD CONTINUE TO CALL UNTIL THE COURT IS ABLE TO ANSWER. IF THE PARTIES DO NOT CALL AS DIRECTED, THE COURT WILL CONSIDER IT A NON-APPEARANCE AND THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED OR SET FOR EX PARTE TRIAL. IF DEFENDANT(S) FAIL TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT, THE PRE-TRIAL WILL BE CONVERTED TO A DEFAULT HEARING WITHOUT FURTHER WARNING. LITIGANTS WHO PLAN TO REPRESENT THEMSELVES OR HAVE NOT YET HIRED AN ATTORNEY MAY CONTACT THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT ANY TIME TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE COURT PROCESS AND TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS TO APPEAR. THE STAFF ATTORNEY CAN BE CONTACTED AT [email protected] OR 216.443.8591. DEFENDANTS IN DEBT COLLECTION CASES MAY CONTACT THE COURT RESOURCE CENTER AT 216.443.8204 OR [email protected] FOR ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE. DEFENDANTS MAY ALSO WISH TO CONTACT THE CLEVELAND LEGAL AID SOCIETY (HTTPS://LASCLEV.ORG/CONTACT/) OR SCRANTON ROAD LEGAL CLINIC (HTTPS://SCRANTONROADMINISTRIES.ORG/LEGAL) FOR LEGAL ADVICE. LITIGANTS NEED NOT PARTICIPATE IF THEY ARE REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, BUT MAY PARTICIPATE AT ANY COURT DATE. FAILURE OF PRO SE PLTF OR PLTF'S COUNSEL TO PARTICIPATE OR APPEAR AT THIS OR ANY COURT DATE OR TO FOLLOW ANY COURT ORDER WILL RESULT IN ACTION BEING DISMISSED. FAILURE OF PRO SE DEFT OR DEFT'S COUNSEL TO PARTICIPATE OR APPEAR AT THIS OR ANY COURT DATE OR TO FOLLOW ANY COURT ORDER WILL RESULT IN COURT HOLDING EX PARTE TRIAL OR WILL RESULT IN ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. JUDGE MICHAEL J. RUSSO'S STANDING ORDERS AND LITIGATION PREFERENCES ARE AVAILABLE ON HIS PROFILE ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE. THE PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE PRE-TRIAL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY CIV. R. 26 PRIOR TO THE FIRST PRE-TRIAL. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CIV.R 26 WILL RESULT IN THE COURT SETTING A DISCOVERY HEARING WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF DISMISSAL OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR FAILING TO COMPLY. THE PARTIES MAY REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT OR FORMAL HEARING ON ANY MATTER BY CONTACTING THE STAFF ATTORNEY. ANY COURT DATE MAY BE HELD IN PERSON, BUT THE PARTIES MUST MAKE ARRANGEMENTS IN ADVANCE BY CONTACTING THE STAFF ATTORNEY. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE TIMOTHY J MCGINTY. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. ON 06/13/2023 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  9. ON 06/13/2023 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED CLARK/RYAN/ BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  10. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED RETURN OF SERVICE CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC
  11. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED RETURN OF SERVICE RYAN CLARK
  12. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 SKY QUEST LLC ATTORNEY ROBERT C WENTZ 0042072 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC
  13. UMS COMPLAINT(50812378) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: RYAN CLARK 6213 DIANA COURT HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143
  14. UMS COMPLAINT(50812377) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC C/O LINDSAY CLARK,STATUTORY AGENT 6213 DIANA COURT HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143-0000
  15. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. RIT FEE
  18. RIT FEE
  19. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE CSM
  20. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE CLARK
  21. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50509213 RETURNED 5/27/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  22. UMS COMPLAINT(50509213) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC C/O LINDSAY CLARK,STATUTORY AGENT 6213 DIANA COURT HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143-0000
  23. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  24. RIT FEE
  25. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  26. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 50349455 RETURNED 04/28/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  27. UMS COMPLAINT(50349476) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: RYAN CLARK 6213 DIANA COURT HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143 ANSWER DATE: 05/10/2023
  28. UMS COMPLAINT(50349455) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC 165 ALPHA PARK DRIVE, BUILDING E HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143 ANSWER DATE: 05/10/2023
  29. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  30. RIT FEE
  31. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  32. RIT FEE
  33. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  34. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  35. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50119079 RETURNED 4/8/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT CLARK/RYAN/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  36. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50119078 RETURNED 4/8/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  37. UDGE ASHLEY KILBANE (374) REMOVED - TRANSF'D TO COMMERCIAL DOCKET. CASE REASSIGNED TO MICHAEL J RUSSO (341) (RANDOM). NOTICE ISSUED
  38. URSUANT TO SUP.R 49.07(C), THIS MATTER IS REFERRED TO ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE FOR REASSIGNMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL DOCKET. NOTICE ISSUED
  39. UMS COMPLAINT(50119079) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RYAN CLARK 6213 DIANA COURT HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143
  40. UMS COMPLAINT(50119078) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CSM CONSULTANTS, LLC 165 ALPHA PARK DRIVE, BUILDING E HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143
  41. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  42. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  43. RIT FEE
  44. RIT FEE
  45. UDGE ASHLEY KILBANE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  46. EGAL RESEARCH
  47. EGAL NEWS
  48. LEGAL AID
  49. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  50. COMPUTER FEE
  51. CLERK'S FEE
  52. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ROBERT C WENTZ

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more