Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Case Information
Filed
2022-04-11
Status
INACTIVE
Type
Tort Miscellaneous
Docket
36 entries
Parties
Plaintiff
Rozzanda Ivey
Defendant
Cleveland Clinic Foundation Co Claims Department
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
- EDIATION SCHEDULED FOR 04/06/2023 AT 11:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
- UDGMENT ENTRY(49975763) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRIAN F. LANGE [email protected]
- UDGMENT ENTRY(49975762) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRIAN F. LANGE [email protected]
- UDGMENT ENTRY(49975761) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRET C PERRY [email protected]
- UDGMENT ENTRY(49975760) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRET C PERRY [email protected]
- UDGMENT ENTRY(49975759) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: THOMAS J SILK [email protected]
- MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, FILED 01/27/2023, IS GRANTED AS THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT AND, AFTER CONSTRUING THE UNDISPUTED EVIDENCE IN A LIGHT MOST FAVORABLE TO THE NON-MOVING PARTIES, REASONABLE MINDS CAN COME ONLY TO THE CONCLUSION THAT DEFENDANT, THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT IN ITS FAVOR AS A MATTER OF LAW. DEFENDANT BROUGHT FORTH EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION CREATED THE HAZARD OR HAD ANY NOTICE OF THE HAZARD PRIOR TO MS. IVEY'S FALL. IVEY DID NOT BRING FORTH ANY EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION WAS ON NOTICE ABOUT THE SUBJECT HAZARD. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION AND AGAINST ROZZANDA IVEY. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
- OTICE FILED BY P1 ROZZANDA IVEY ATTORNEY THOMAS J SILK 0021462 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF DEPOSITIONS
- EDIATION SET FOR 04/06/2023 AT 11:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
- EDIATION SCHEDULED FOR 03/30/2023 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
- OTICE OF DEPOSITION OF D1 CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION FILED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF ROZZANDA IVEY
- OTICE OF DEPOSITION OF D1 CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION FILED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF ROZZANDA IVEY
- EDIATION SET FOR 03/30/2023 AT 09:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
- MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO COMPEL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT, CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, FILED 12/28/2022, IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE TO DEFENDANT THE CLEVELAND CLINIC BY 02/06/2023 THREE DATES BY 02/28/2023 ON WHICH EACH OF THE OUTSTANDING DEPOSITIONS COULD OCCUR. SHOULD THE DEPOSITIONS NOT OCCUR BY 02/28/2023, ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT THE CLEVELAND CLINIC WILL BE DISMISSED. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
- OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION 03/07/2023 - GRANTED
- OTICE OF TRANSCRIPT FILED D1 CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, BRIAN F. LANGE 0080627 NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT OF PLAINTIFF ROZZANDA IVEY
- OTION TO DISMISS FILED MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO COMPEL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT, CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION 01/30/2023 - GRANTED
- PRE-TRIAL HELD; COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATING. ISSUES DISCUSSED, DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 10/14/2022. PLAINTIFF TO PRODUCE ANY EXPERT REPROT BY 11/14/2022; DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE ANY EXPERT REPORT BY 01/31/2022. ANY MSJ TO BE FILED BY 01/31/2023; BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION AND REPLIES TO BE FILED PURSUANT TO THE CIVIL RULES. CAPTIONED CASE IS HEREBY REFERRED TO MEDIATION WITH THE COURT MEDIATOR. MEDIATION TO TAKE PLACE BETWEEN 03/01/2023 AND 04/30/2023. IF NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE HEALTH OF THE PARTICIPANTS, ANY PARTY MAY ATTEND THE MEDIATION BY TELEPHONE OR VIDEOCONFERENCE. IF MEDIATING IN A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT PROVES TO BE UNPRODUCTIVE, THE MEDIATOR MAY ORDER ANY OR ALL OF THE PARTICIPANTS TO APPEAR IN PERSON AT A LATER DATE. THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO DISCLOSE THEIR DEMAND(S) AND OFFER(S) IN ADVANCE OF MEDIATION TO FACILITATE THE MOST PRODUCTIVE MEDIATION POSSIBLE. THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO COMPLETE SUFFICIENT DISCOVERY IN ORDER TO MEDIATE APPROPRIATELY. THE ATTORNEYS ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THEIR MEDIATOR IN ADVANCE TO DISCLOSE ANY INFORMATION OR ISSUES THEY MAY HAVE THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO THE MEDIATOR, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO CASE PECULIARITIES, DISCOVERY ISSUES, OR CLIENT EXPECTATIONS. IF CIRCUMSTANCES WILL PREVENT THE PARTIES FROM MEDIATING THEIR CASE WITH THE DATE THEY CHOSE WITH THE ADR DEPARTMENT, THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO CANCEL THEIR MEDIATION AT LEAST 20 DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEDIATION. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THIS COURTESY TO THE ADR DEPARTMENT WILL RESULT IN THE COURT SETTING A MANDATORY, IN-PERSON PRE-TRIAL WITH ALL CLIENTS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF THE SCHEDULED MEDIATION TO EXPLAIN THE PROGRESS OF THEIR CASE AND WHY THEY WERE UNABLE TO MEDIATE AS PREVIOUSLY AGREED. SANCTIONS MAY ISSUE. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 05/11/2023 AT 01:30 PM. TRIAL BY JURY SET FOR 06/05/2023 AT 10:00 AM. TRIAL BRIEFS; JOINT JURY INSTRUCTIONS; VERDICT FORMS AGREED UPON BY COUNSEL; WITNESS LISTS; EXHIBIT LISTS; AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE ARE TO BE FILED AND COPIES DELIVERED TO THE COURTROOM OR STAFF ATTORNEY BY 05/15/2023; AN E-MAILED COPY TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY IS PREFERRED, INCLUDING ALL JURY INSTRUCTIONS, INTERROGATORIES, AND VERDICT FORMS IN MICROSOFT WORD FORMAT. PRIOR TO THE START OF JURY SELECTION, THE PARTIES ARE TO DELIVER TO THE COURT OR THE STAFF ATTORNEY A BRIEF AGREED-TO STATEMENT OF THE CASE TO BE READ TO THE PROSPECTIVE JURORS AS CONTEMPLATED BY CIV.R. 47(A). NOTE TAKING BY JURORS IS PERMITTED. JURY QUESTIONNAIRES AND SUBMISSION OF QUESTIONS BY JURORS TYPICALLY IS NOT PERMITTED. NOTICE ISSUED
- ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 ROZZANDA IVEY ATTORNEY THOMAS J SILK 0021462 PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN
- ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 ROZZANDA IVEY ATTORNEY THOMAS J SILK 0021462 INITIAL DISCLOSURES
- ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 ROZZANDA IVEY ATTORNEY THOMAS J SILK 0021462 PRETRIAL STATEMENT
- RETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 07/12/2022 AT 11:45 AM. PHONE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE TO BE HELD IN LIEU OF CMC. ALL PARTIES ARE TO JOIN ONE LINE AND THEN CALL THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT 216.443.8591 AT THE TIME OF THE PRE-TRIAL OR PROVIDE A CONFERENCE NUMBER TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY IN ADVANCE. IF THE CALL IS UNANSWERED, THE PARTIES SHOULD CONTINUE TO CALL UNTIL THE COURT IS ABLE TO ANSWER. IF THE PARTIES DO NOT CALL AS DIRECTED, THE COURT WILL CONSIDER IT A NON-APPEARANCE AND THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED OR SET FOR EX PARTE TRIAL. LITIGANTS WHO PLAN TO REPRESENT THEMSELVES OR HAVE NOT YET HIRED AN ATTORNEY MAY CONTACT THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT ANY TIME TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE COURT PROCESS AND TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS TO APPEAR. THE STAFF ATTORNEY CAN BE CONTACTED AT [email protected] OR 216.443.8591. DEFENDANTS IN DEBT COLLECTION CASES MAY CONTACT THE COURT RESOURCE CENTER AT 216.443.8204 OR [email protected] FOR ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE. LITIGANTS NEED NOT PARTICIPATE IF THEY ARE REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. FAILURE OF PRO SE PLTF OR PLTF'S COUNSEL TO PARTICIPATE OR APPEAR AT THIS OR ANY COURT DATE OR TO FOLLOW ANY COURT ORDER WILL RESULT IN ACTION BEING DISMISSED. FAILURE OF PRO SE DEFT OR DEFT'S COUNSEL TO PARTICIPATE OR APPEAR AT THIS OR ANY COURT DATE OR TO FOLLOW ANY COURT ORDER WILL RESULT IN COURT HOLDING EX PARTE TRIAL OR WILL RESULT IN ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. JUDGE MICHAEL J. RUSSO'S STANDING ORDERS AND LITIGATION PREFERENCES ARE AVAILABLE ON HIS PROFILE ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE. THE PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE PRE-TRIAL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY CIV. R. 26 PRIOR TO THE FIRST PRE-TRIAL. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CIV.R 26 WILL RESULT IN THE COURT SETTING A DISCOVERY HEARING WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF DISMISSAL OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR FAILING TO COMPLY. THE PARTIES MAY REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT OR FORMAL HEARING ON ANY MATTER BY CONTACTING THE STAFF ATTORNEY. ANY COURT DATE MAY BE HELD IN PERSON, BUT THE PARTIES MUST MAKE ARRANGEMENTS IN ADVANCE BY CONTACTING THE STAFF ATTORNEY. NOTICE ISSUED
- OTICE FILED BY P1 ROZZANDA IVEY ATTORNEY THOMAS J SILK 0021462 NOTICE OF FILING OF RULE 4.7 WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS
- NSWER FILED BY D1 CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ATTORNEY BRIAN F. LANGE 0080627 ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT, CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
- UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
- AIVER OF SER. OF SUM. REQUEST(47251559) SENT BY PLAINTIFF. TO: CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION 9500 EUCLID AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44195
- UDGE MICHAEL P SHAUGHNESSY ASSIGNED (RANDOM); RE-FILED CASE, REASSIGNED TO ORIGINAL JUDGE, JUDGE MICHAEL J RUSSO
- UDGE MICHAEL P SHAUGHNESSY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
- EGAL RESEARCH
- EGAL NEWS
- EGAL AID
- OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
- OMPUTER FEE
- LERK'S FEE
- EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID THOMAS J SILK
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In
