Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-26
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 110 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Huntington National Bank
Defendant La Trece Lewis Webb Aka: La Trice Lewis Webb|John Doe Real Name Unk., Unk. Spouse Of La Trece Lewis Webb Aka La Trece R. Lewis Webb Aka La Trece Webb|James E. Webb|State Of Ohio Department Of Taxation
Photo of Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Judge

Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, SERVICE REQUEST, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. OURT COST ASSESSED HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK BILLED C/O ATTY BILL AMOUNT 602.91 PAID AMOUNT 275 AMOUNT DUE 327.91
  3. OURT COST ASSESSED HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK BILL AMOUNT 602.91 PAID AMOUNT 275 AMOUNT DUE 327.91
  4. LAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. AS THE PARTIES HAVE ENTERED INTO A LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT, PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(A)(2), THIS CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). NOTICE ISSUED
  5. OTION TO DISMISS FILED MOTION TO DISMISS 10/02/2023 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  6. HE COURT HAS BEEN NOTIFIED OF A LOSS MITIGATION STAY UNDER FEDERAL OR STATE LAW. THE CASE IS STAYED AND WILL BE REINSTATED ONLY UPON PROPER MOTION AFTER THE LOSS MITIGATION PROCESS HAS BEEN CONCLUDED. PLAINTIFF TO FILE A NOTICE OF STATUS OR A MOTION TO REINSTATE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. ENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 05/04/2023 AT 09:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  8. HE COURT HAS BEEN NOTIFIED OF A LOSS MITIGATION STAY UNDER FEDERAL OR STATE LAW. THE CASE IS STAYED AND WILL BE REINSTATED ONLY UPON PROPER MOTION AFTER THE LOSS MITIGATION PROCESS HAS BEEN CONCLUDED. PLAINTIFF TO FILE A NOTICE OF STATUS OR A MOTION TO REINSTATE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY IS GRANTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. 1 HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE ERIC T DEIGHTON 0071456. ^F^ MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL 05/01/2023 - GRANTED
  10. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ATTORNEY ERIC T DEIGHTON 0071456 PRETRIAL STATEMENT
  11. OTION FILED FOR D1 LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB PETER COZMYK 0078862 MOTION TO STAY 05/01/2023 - GRANTED
  12. ENCH TRIAL SET FOR 05/04/2023 AT 09:00 AM. A BENCH TRIAL IS SET IN THIS CASE FOR 05/04/23 AT 9:00 AM. TRIAL BRIEFS AND WITNESS LISTS ARE DUE 7 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE TRIAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. HE COURT IS IN RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF STATUS OF LOSS MITIGATION. DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S STATUS WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. OTICE FILED BY P1 HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 NOTICE OF STATUS OF LOSS MITIGATION
  15. LAINTIFF TO FILE, WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THIS ORDER, A NOTICE AS TO WHETHER THE PLAINTIFF INTENDS TO PROCEED WITH FORECLOSURE AT THIS TIME OR WHETHER THE LOAN IS ON HOLD FOR A LOSS MITIGATION REVIEW. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. RIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY D1 LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB PETER COZMYK 0078862 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  17. DEFAULT HEARING HELD BY MAGISTRATE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT APPEARED. PLAINTIFF'S FILE IS ON HOLD FOR LOSS MITIGATION. AS SUCH, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT IS HELD IN ABEYANCE. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE A BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO THE PLAINTIFF'S MSJ IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION IS NOW DUE 01/06/23. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. OTICE FILED BY P1 HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 NOTICE OF DEFAULT HEARING
  19. RETRIAL HELD. NEXT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE IS SET FOR 11/29/22 AT 10:30 AM. DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE A BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO THE PLAINTIFF'S MSJ IS GRANTED. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION IS DUE 12/08/22. NOTICE ISSUED
  20. ELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 11/29/2022 AT 10:30 AM.
  21. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY D1 LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB ATTORNEY PETER COZMYK 0078862 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  22. OTICE FILED BY P1 HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 NOTICE OF DEFAULT HEARING
  23. ELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 11/29/2022 AT 10:30 AM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  24. ELEPHONE CONFERENCE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 10/14/2022 AT 09:30 AM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 10/14/2022 AT 02:45 PM. . . NOTICE ISSUED
  25. ELEPHONE CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 10/14/2022 AT 09:30 AM IS CANCELLED. MAGISTRATE: AMY R JACKSON (0075741) REASON: UNKNOWN (notice sent).
  26. OTICE FILED BY P1 HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION
  27. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  28. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT
  29. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ATTORNEY JAMES L SASSANO 0062253 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  30. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 12/03/2022 - HELD IN ABEYANCE
  31. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11/29/2022 - HELD IN ABEYANCE
  32. ON 07/16/2022 THE WITHIN NAMED LEWIS-WEBB/LA-TRECE/ WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  33. ON 06/02/2022 THE WITHIN NAMED LEWIS-WEBB/LA-TRECE/ WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  34. ON 06/06/2022 THE WITHIN NAMED JOHN DOE REAL NAME UNK., UNK. SPOUSE OF LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  35. ON 07/16/2022 THE WITHIN NAMED JOHN DOE REAL NAME UNK., UNK. SPOUSE OF LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  36. ON 06/06/2022 THE WITHIN NAMED WEBB/JAMES/E. WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  37. ON 07/01/2022 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED WEBB/JAMES/E. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  38. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  39. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  40. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  41. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  42. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  43. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  44. ON 07/01/2022 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED WEBB/JAMES/E. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  45. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED RETURN OF SERVICE - JAMES E. WEBB
  46. ELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 10/14/2022 AT 09:30 AM. A TELEPHONE STATUS / SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS SET IN THIS CASE WITH MAGISTRATE AMY JACKSON. ATTORNEYS / SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES ARE TO CALL 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE. NOTICE ISSUED
  47. ELEPHONE CONFERENCE HELD. THE PARTIES ARE TRYING TO RESOLVE THIS CASE. AS SUCH, NEXT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 10/14/22 AT 9:30 AM. DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT ALL LOSS MITIGATION DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF ON OR BEFORE 09/09/22. NOTICE ISSUED
  48. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED PROCESS SERVICE RETURN
  49. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47850677 RETURNED 07/21/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WEBB/JAMES/E. - INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  50. NSWER FILED BY D1 LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB ATTORNEY PETER COZMYK 0078862 ANSWER
  51. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47850677 RETURNED 7/14/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WEBB/JAMES/E. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  52. ELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 08/08/2022 AT 09:15 AM. A TELEPHONE STATUS / SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS SET IN THIS CASE WITH MAGISTRATE AMY JACKSON. ATTORNEYS / SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES ARE TO CALL 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE. THE ATTORNEYS / SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES ARE TO COMPLY WITH CIVIL RULE 26(F) BY CONFERRING PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ABOUT DATES AND DISCOVERY AND BY PREPARING A WRITTEN DISCOVERY PLAN. NOTICE ISSUED
  53. EFENDANT, LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. RESPONSIVE PLEADING IS DUE ON OR BEFORE 07/18/22. NOTICE ISSUED
  54. NSWER FILED BY D4 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION ATTORNEY NICOLE R. RANDALL 0081351 ANSWER OF STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
  55. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47681150 RETURNED 6/22/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT LEWIS-WEBB/LA-TRECE/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  56. UMS COMPLAINT(47850677) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JAMES E. WEBB 135 CHESTNUT LANE APT. 229 CLEVELAND, OH 44143-0000
  57. UMS COMPLAINT(47850592) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JAMES E. WEBB 135 CHESTNUT LANE APT. 229 CLEVELAND, OH 44143-0000
  58. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  59. RIT FEE
  60. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  61. RIT FEE
  62. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED CM AND PROCESS SERVICE
  63. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 07/06/2022 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  64. OTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED D1 LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB PETER COZMYK 0078862. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  65. SPS RECEIPT NO. 47681155 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/06/2022 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 06/15/2022.
  66. SPS RECEIPT NO. 47681152 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/08/2022 JOHN DOE REAL NAME UNK., UNK. SPOUSE OF LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB PROCESSED BY COC 06/15/2022.
  67. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47681153 RETURNED 06/02/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE REAL NAME UNK., UNK. SPOUSE OF LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  68. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47681151 RETURNED 06/02/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT LEWIS-WEBB/LA-TRECE/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  69. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47681154 RETURNED 6/3/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WEBB/JAMES/E. - REFUSED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  70. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47681151 RETURNED 6/2/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT LEWIS-WEBB/LA-TRECE/ - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  71. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 47681153 RETURNED 6/2/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE REAL NAME UNK., UNK. SPOUSE OF LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  72. UMS COMPLAINT(47681155) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION CO OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  73. UMS COMPLAINT(47681154) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JAMES E. WEBB 1114 PIERMONT ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44121
  74. UMS COMPLAINT(47681153) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE REAL NAME UNK., UNK. SPOUSE OF LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB 4956 KAREN ISLE DRIVE RICHMOND HEIGHTS, OH 44143-0000
  75. UMS COMPLAINT(47681152) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN DOE REAL NAME UNK., UNK. SPOUSE OF LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB 205 WILSHIRE DRIVE GLENN HEIGHTS, TX 75154
  76. UMS COMPLAINT(47681151) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB 4956 KAREN ISLE DRIVE RICHMOND HEIGHTS, OH 44143-0000
  77. UMS COMPLAINT(47681150) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB 205 WILSHIRE DRIVE GLENN HEIGHTS, TX 75154
  78. UMS COMPLAINT(47681149) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JAMES E. WEBB 1114 PIERMONT ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44121
  79. UMS COMPLAINT(47681148) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JOHN DOE REAL NAME UNK., UNK. SPOUSE OF LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB 4956 KAREN ISLE DRIVE RICHMOND HEIGHTS, OH 44143-0000
  80. UMS COMPLAINT(47681147) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: LA-TRECE LEWIS-WEBB 4956 KAREN ISLE DRIVE RICHMOND HEIGHTS, OH 44143-0000
  81. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  82. AGISTRATE AMY R JACKSON ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  83. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  84. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  85. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  86. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  87. RIT FEE
  88. RIT FEE
  89. RIT FEE
  90. RIT FEE
  91. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  92. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  93. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  94. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  95. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  96. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  97. RIT FEE
  98. RIT FEE
  99. RIT FEE
  100. RIT FEE
  101. RIT FEE
  102. UDGE MICHAEL J RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  103. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  104. EGAL RESEARCH
  105. EGAL NEWS
  106. LEGAL AID
  107. COMPUTER FEE
  108. CLERK'S FEE
  109. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JAMES L SASSANO
  110. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JAMES L SASSANO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more