Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
- NSWER OF GARNISHEE BANK OF AMERICA, NA FILED. IS THE GARNISHEE IN POSSESSION OF FUNDS: NO
- EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 50312244 RETURNED 05/04/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT USTOC ENTERPRISES, LLC. ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
- SPS RECEIPT NO. 50312243 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/11/2023 BANK OF AMERICA NA PROCESSED BY COC 04/19/2023.
- ASE REFUND TO WELTMAN WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
- ARNISHMENT NOTICE(50312244) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: USTOC ENTERPRISES, LLC. 11111 KATY FWY, SUITE 910 HOUSTON, TX 77079
- ARNISHMENT NOTICE(50312243) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BANK OF AMERICA NA PO BOX 15047 ATTN: LOP WILMINGTON, DE 19850-0000
- FFIDAVIT, ORDER AND NOTICE OF GARNISHMENT FILED. ORDER OF GARNISHMENT SENT TO GARNISHEE & NOTICE SENT TO DEBTOR. IF A HEARING IS REQUESTED, NOTICE OF HEARING DATE WILL BE SENT.
- ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 49660221 RETURNED 02/08/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT USTOC ENTERPRISES, LLC. - UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
- ARNISHMENT OTHER THAN WAGE SUBMITTED $80.00
- EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID WELTMAN WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
- LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF APPEARED; NEITHER DEFENDANT NOR COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT APPEARED. A HEARING WAS HELD. UPON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE COURT FINDS THAT PROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED UNDER CIV.R. 12, AND THAT PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS BELOW IN PLAINTIFF'S FAVOR AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN DEFAULT. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 55, DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY RENDERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANT USTOC ENTERPRISES, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,482.72. DEFENDANT TO PAY POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST AT THE APPLICABLE STATUTORY RATE OF 5% FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT, PLUS COSTS OF THIS ACTION. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
- FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP ATTORNEY ROBERT B WELTMAN 0008230 AFF OF PLAINTIFF
- OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MDJ 03/07/2023 - GRANTED
- SPS RECEIPT NO. 49660221 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/03/2023 USTOC ENTERPRISES, LLC. PROCESSED BY COC 02/08/2023.
- UMS COMPLAINT(49660221) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: USTOC ENTERPRISES, LLC. 11111 KATY FWY, SUITE 910 HOUSTON, TX 77079
- UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
- RIT FEE
- UDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM); COMMERCIAL DOCKET CASE, REASSIGNED TO JUDGE MICHAEL J RUSSO (RANDOM)
- UDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
- EGAL RESEARCH
- EGAL NEWS
- EGAL AID
- OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
- OMPUTER FEE
- LERK'S FEE
- DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID WELTMAN WEINBERG & REIS CO., L.P.A.
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In