Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-10
Status INACTIVE
Type Commercial Docket
Docket 46 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Laverne Ford
Defendant Charles T Hubbard|Connie L. Hubbard
Photo of Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Judge

Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. UPON NOTICE BY THE PARTIES, EFFECTIVE 11/28/2022, ALL CLAIMS ARE SETTLED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE COURT RETAINS JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT REACHED BETWEEN THE PARTIES. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  3. NOTICE FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CHARLES T HUBBARD(D1) and CONNIE L. HUBBARD(D2) ATTORNEY CYNTHIA K CURTIN 0041525 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
  4. 11/08/2022: MEDIATION HEARING HELD. UPON NOTICE BY THE COURT'S ADR DEPARTMENT, THE PARTIES IN THE CAPTIONED CASE HAVE REACHED A SETTLEMENT. THE PARTIES ARE TO SUBMIT AN ENTRY DISPOSING OF THE CASE OR TO APPEAR FOR AN ATTORNEY CONFERENCE AS FOLLOWS: ATTORNEY CONFERENCE SET FOR 12/08/2022 AT 10:00 AM. FAILURE TO EITHER SUBMIT AN ENTRY DISPOSING OF THE CASE OR TO APPEAR FOR THE ATTORNEY CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE WILL RESULT IN THE COURT DISMISSING THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. MEDIATION SCHEDULED FOR 10/21/2022 AT 11:00 AM IS CANCELLED.
  6. ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CHARLES T HUBBARD(D1) and CONNIE L. HUBBARD(D2) ATTORNEY CYNTHIA K CURTIN 0041525 DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
  7. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID EDGAR H BOLES
  8. AMENDED COMPLAINT $75
  9. 10/04/2022: P1 LAVERNE FORD EDGAR H BOLES 0003885 PLAINTIFF LAVERNE FORD'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, INSTANTER, FILED 09/19/2022, IS GRANTED IN PART. PLAINTIFF IS GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT TO INCLUDE NEW DATES OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE AT ISSUE IN HER ALLEGED CLAIM. PLAINTIFF IS NOT GRANTED LEAVE TO INCLUDE INFORMATION ABOUT OTHER PROPERTIES THAT MAY BE OWNED BY DEFENDANTS, AS THEY HAVE NO BEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S SEWER LINE. PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER AMENDED COMPLAINT SEPARATELY ON THE DOCKET BY 10/12/2022, OR IT WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED BY THE COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CHARLES T HUBBARD(D1) and CONNIE L. HUBBARD(D2) CYNTHIA K CURTIN 0041525 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE
  11. MOTION FILED FOR P1 LAVERNE FORD EDGAR H BOLES 0003885 PLAINTIFF LAVERNE FORD'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, INSTANTER 10/04/2022 - GRANTED IN PART
  12. 09/13/2022: PRE-TRIAL HELD; COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATING. ISSUES DISCUSSED. MEDIATION CONTINUED AT REQUEST OF THE PARTIES. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 11/15/2022 AT 11:00 AM. THE PARTIES ARE TO JOIN ONE LINE AND THEN CALL THE COURT OR DISTRIBUTE A CONFERENCE LINE IN ADVANCE. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. MEDIATION SET FOR 11/04/2022 AT 11:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  14. MEDIATION SET FOR 10/21/2022 AT 11:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  15. MEDIATION SCHEDULED FOR 10/11/2022 AT 01:30 PM IS CANCELLED.
  16. MEDIATION SET FOR 10/11/2022 AT 01:30 PM. (Notice Sent).
  17. 06/24/2022: PRE-TRIAL HELD; COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATING. ISSUES DISCUSSED, DISCOVERY IS ONGOING. CAPTIONED CASE IS HEREBY REFERRED TO MEDIATION WITH THE COURT MEDIATOR. MEDIATION TO TAKE PLACE WITH ROBERT MCCLELLAND BEFORE 10/31/2022. IF NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE HEALTH OF THE PARTICIPANTS, ANY PARTY MAY ATTEND THE MEDIATION BY TELEPHONE OR VIDEOCONFERENCE. IF MEDIATING IN A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT PROVES TO BE UNPRODUCTIVE, THE MEDIATOR MAY ORDER ANY OR ALL OF THE PARTICIPANTS TO APPEAR IN PERSON AT A LATER DATE. THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO DISCLOSE THEIR DEMAND(S) AND OFFER(S) IN ADVANCE OF MEDIATION TO FACILITATE THE MOST PRODUCTIVE MEDIATION POSSIBLE. THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO COMPLETE SUFFICIENT DISCOVERY IN ORDER TO MEDIATE APPROPRIATELY. THE ATTORNEYS ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT THEIR MEDIATOR IN ADVANCE TO DISCLOSE ANY INFORMATION OR ISSUES THEY MAY HAVE THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO THE MEDIATOR, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO CASE PECULIARITIES, DISCOVERY ISSUES, OR CLIENT EXPECTATIONS. IF CIRCUMSTANCES WILL PREVENT THE PARTIES FROM MEDIATING THEIR CASE WITH THE DATE THEY CHOSE WITH THE ADR DEPARTMENT, THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO CANCEL THEIR MEDIATION AT LEAST 20 DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEDIATION. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THIS COURTESY TO THE ADR DEPARTMENT WILL RESULT IN THE COURT SETTING A MANDATORY, IN-PERSON PRE-TRIAL WITH ALL CLIENTS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF THE SCHEDULED MEDIATION TO EXPLAIN THE PROGRESS OF THEIR CASE AND WHY THEY WERE UNABLE TO MEDIATE AS PREVIOUSLY AGREED. SANCTIONS MAY ISSUE. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 09/13/2022 AT 10:30 AM. THE PARTIES ARE TO JOIN ONE LINE AND THEN CALL THE COURT AT 216.443.8591. THE PARTIES SHOULD BE PREPARED TO SET A FULL SCHEDULE AT THIS PRE-TRIAL. THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE BRENDAN J SHEEHAN. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF P1 LAVERNE FORD FILED PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF CONNIE L. HUBBARD
  19. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF P1 LAVERNE FORD FILED PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF CHARLES T. HUBBARD
  20. NOTICE FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CHARLES T HUBBARD(D1) and CONNIE L. HUBBARD(D2) ATTORNEY CYNTHIA K CURTIN 0041525 NOTICE OF DEPOSITION
  21. NOTICE FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CHARLES T HUBBARD(D1) and CONNIE L. HUBBARD(D2) ATTORNEY CYNTHIA K CURTIN 0041525 NOTICE OF SERVICE
  22. NOTICE FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CHARLES T HUBBARD(D1) and CONNIE L. HUBBARD(D2) ATTORNEY CYNTHIA K CURTIN 0041525 NOTICE OF SERVICE
  23. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR 06/23/2022 AT 10:45 AM IS RESCHEDULED FOR 06/24/2022 AT 10:30 AM (Notice Sent).
  24. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/23/2022 AT 10:45 AM IS CANCELLED. ATTORNEY: EDGAR H BOLES (0003885) REASON: COUNSEL IS UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THE PRE-TRIAL. (notice sent).
  25. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 06/23/2022 AT 10:45 AM. PHONE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE TO BE HELD IN LIEU OF CMC. ALL PARTIES ARE TO JOIN ONE LINE AND THEN CALL THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT 216.443.8591 AT THE TIME OF THE PRE-TRIAL OR PROVIDE A CONFERENCE NUMBER TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY IN ADVANCE. IF THE CALL IS UNANSWERED, THE PARTIES SHOULD CONTINUE TO CALL UNTIL THE COURT IS ABLE TO ANSWER. IF THE PARTIES DO NOT CALL AS DIRECTED, THE COURT WILL CONSIDER IT A NON-APPEARANCE AND THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED OR SET FOR EX PARTE TRIAL. IF DEFENDANT(S) FAIL TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT, THE PRE-TRIAL WILL BE CONVERTED TO A DEFAULT HEARING WITHOUT FURTHER WARNING. PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL SHALL PROVIDE BEFORE THE HEARING: A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY, AN AFFIDAVIT OF DAMAGES, AND A COPY OF THE LETTER SENT TO THE DEFENDANT(S) NOTIFYING THEM OF THE HEARING. SAID LETTER SHALL BE SENT BY ORDINARY MAIL. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO FILE A WRITTEN MOTION FOR DEFAULT OR TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS BY THE TIME OF THE HEARING WILL RESULT IN THE COURT DISMISSING THE CASE. THESE ITEMS MAY BE E-MAILED TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT [email protected]. DEFAULT HEARING WILL BE HELD BY TELEPHONE UNLESS OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE AT LEAST ONE WEEK IN ADVANCE. ALL PARTIES ARE TO JOIN ONE LINE AND THEN CALL THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT 216.443.8591 AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING OR PROVIDE A CONFERENCE NUMBER TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY IN ADVANCE. IF THE CALL IS UNANSWERED, THE PARTIES SHOULD CONTINUE TO CALL UNTIL THE COURT IS ABLE TO ANSWER. IF THE PARTIES DO NOT CALL AS DIRECTED, THE COURT WILL CONSIDER IT A NON-APPEARANCE AND THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED OR SET FOR EX PARTE TRIAL. LITIGANTS WHO PLAN TO REPRESENT THEMSELVES OR HAVE NOT YET HIRED AN ATTORNEY MAY CONTACT THE STAFF ATTORNEY AT ANY TIME TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE COURT PROCESS AND TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS TO APPEAR. THE STAFF ATTORNEY CAN BE CONTACTED AT [email protected] OR 216.443.8591. DEFENDANTS IN DEBT COLLECTION CASES MAY CONTACT THE COURT RESOURCE CENTER AT 216.443.8204 OR [email protected] FOR ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE. LITIGANTS NEED NOT PARTICIPATE IF THEY ARE REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. FAILURE OF PRO SE PLTF OR PLTF'S COUNSEL TO PARTICIPATE OR APPEAR AT THIS OR ANY COURT DATE OR TO FOLLOW ANY COURT ORDER WILL RESULT IN ACTION BEING DISMISSED. FAILURE OF PRO SE DEFT OR DEFT'S COUNSEL TO PARTICIPATE OR APPEAR AT THIS OR ANY COURT DATE OR TO FOLLOW ANY COURT ORDER WILL RESULT IN COURT HOLDING EX PARTE TRIAL OR WILL RESULT IN ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. JUDGE MICHAEL J. RUSSO'S STANDING ORDERS AND LITIGATION PREFERENCES ARE AVAILABLE ON HIS PROFILE ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE. THE PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE PRE-TRIAL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY CIV. R. 26 PRIOR TO THE FIRST PRE-TRIAL. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CIV.R 26 WILL RESULT IN THE COURT SETTING A DISCOVERY HEARING WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF DISMISSAL OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR FAILING TO COMPLY. THE PARTIES MAY REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT OR FORMAL HEARING ON ANY MATTER BY CONTACTING THE STAFF ATTORNEY. ANY COURT DATE MAY BE HELD IN PERSON, BUT THE PARTIES MUST MAKE ARRANGEMENTS IN ADVANCE BY CONTACTING THE STAFF ATTORNEY. NOTICE ISSUED
  26. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 LAVERNE FORD ATTORNEY EDGAR H BOLES 0003885 PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  27. ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) CHARLES T HUBBARD(D1) and CONNIE L. HUBBARD(D2) ATTORNEY CYNTHIA K CURTIN 0041525 ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST COMPLAINT
  28. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED DEFENDANT(S) CHARLES T HUBBARD(D1) and CONNIE L. HUBBARD(D2) CYNTHIA K CURTIN 0041525. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  29. USPS RECEIPT NO. 46977294 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/18/2022 HUBBARD/CONNIE/L. PROCESSED BY COC 04/28/2022.
  30. USPS RECEIPT NO. 46977293 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/18/2022 HUBBARD/CHARLES/T PROCESSED BY COC 04/28/2022.
  31. STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD FILED STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD AND JOURNAL ENTRY FOR DEFENDANTS
  32. SUMS COMPLAINT(46977294) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CONNIE L. HUBBARD 10658 CAMINITO DERECHO SAN DIEGO, CA 92126
  33. SUMS COMPLAINT(46977293) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHARLES T HUBBARD 10658 CAMINITO DERECHO SAN DIEGO, CA 92126
  34. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  35. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  36. WRIT FEE
  37. WRIT FEE
  38. JUDGE MAUREEN CLANCY ASSIGNED (RANDOM); COMMERCIAL DOCKET CASE, REASSIGNED TO JUDGE MICHAEL J RUSSO (RANDOM)
  39. JUDGE MAUREEN CLANCY ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  40. LEGAL RESEARCH
  41. LEGAL NEWS
  42. LEGAL AID
  43. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  44. COMPUTER FEE
  45. CLERK'S FEE
  46. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID EDGAR H BOLES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more