Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-06
Status INACTIVE
Type Admin. Appeals Other
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff City Of Cleveland
Defendant Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Association
Photo of Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Judge

Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52214576) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DAVID P FRANTZ [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(52214575) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MARISA L SERRAT [email protected]
  4. THIS COURT CONSIDERED THE CITY OF CLEVELAND'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS APPLICATION TO VACATE THE ARBITRATION AWARD; THE CPPA'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION AND APPLICATION TO CONFIRM THE ARBITRATION AWARD; AND, THE CITY OF CLEVELAND'S REPLY THERETO. THIS COURT FINDS THAT THE ARBITRATOR SELLMAN WAS CHOSEN BY BOTH PARTIES, CONSIDERED THE FACTS RAISED BY BOTH PARTIES, CONSIDERED CASE LAW AND ARGUMENTS PROVIDED BY BOTH PARTIES IN INTERPRETING THE APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THE PARTIES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT, AND THEN APPLIED HIS FACTUAL CONCLUSIONS TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THE CONTRACT IN FASHIONING AN AWARD. THE PARTIES RECEIVED THE TYPE OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDING REQUIRED BY LAW AND BARGAINED FOR BY THE PARTIES. CPPA'S APPLICATION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION IS WELL TAKEN. THE CPPA'S APPLICATION TO CONFIRM THE ARBITRATION AWARD IS GRANTED. THE ARBITRATION AWARD IS CONFIRMED. CITY OF CLEVELAND'S NOTICE OF MOTION / APPLICATION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD UNDER O.R.C. 2711.01 ET.SEQ. DAVID P FRANTZ (0091352), FILED 06/06/2023, IS DENIED. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. COURT COST ASSESSED AS EACH THEIR OWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. REPLY BRIEF FILED BY P1 CITY OF CLEVELAND DAVID P FRANTZ 0091352 CITY OF CLEVELAND'S REPLY BRIEF
  6. MOTION FILED FOR P1 CITY OF CLEVELAND DAVID P FRANTZ 0091352. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SET OR EXTEND BRIEF DEADLINE, FILED 08/30/2023, IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS REPLY 09-08-23. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR SERRAT/MARISA/L 09/04/2023 17:01:47
  8. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR FRANTZ/DAVID/P 09/04/2023 17:01:47
  9. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 10/11/2023 AT 01:20 PM. CMC SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY PHONE, COURT TO INITIATE THE CALL. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE PARTICIPATE BY PHONE AND ARE REQUIRED TO FILE THEIR TELEPHONE NUMBER, ADDRESS AND EMAIL ADDRESS WITH THIS COURT PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE CMC. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. DISCOVERY IS TO START IMMEDIATELY. PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULES OF PROCEDURE. PARTIES TO BE READY WITH DEMAND AND OFFER OF SETTLEMENT.
  10. MOTION FILED FOR P1 CITY OF CLEVELAND DAVID P FRANTZ 0091352 UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SET OR EXTEND BRIEF DEADLINE 09/07/2023 - GRANTED
  11. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FILED BY D1 CLEVELAND POLICE PATROLMEN'S ASSOCIATION MARISA L SERRAT 0088840 CPPA'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO CITY OF CLEVELAND'S APPLICATION TO VACATE AND CPPA'S APPLICATION TO CONFIRM
  12. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO THE CITY OF CLEVELAND'S APPLICATION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD, FILED 08/04/2023, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. DEFENDANT TO SO SUBMIT BY 08-25-23. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO THE CITY OF CLEVELAND'S APPLICATION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD 08/08/2023 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  14. DEFENDANT CPPA'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO THE CITY OF CLEVELAND'S APPLICATION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD, FILED 06/30/2023, IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT TO FILE BRIEF IN OPPOSITION BY 08-04-23. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO THE CITY OF CLEVELAND'S APPLICATION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD 07/11/2023 - GRANTED
  16. USPS RECEIPT NO. 50807789 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/09/2023 CLEVELAND POLICE PATROLMEN'S ASSOCIATION PROCESSED BY COC 06/14/2023.
  17. ARBITRATION NOTICES(50807789) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CLEVELAND POLICE PATROLMEN'S ASSOCIATION 1303 W. 58TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44102
  18. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. JUDGE JOHN D SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  20. LEGAL RESEARCH
  21. LEGAL NEWS
  22. LEGAL AID
  23. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  24. COMPUTER FEE
  25. CLERK'S FEE
  26. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DAVID P FRANTZ
  27. CITY OF CLEVELAND'S NOTICE OF FILING ARBITRATION RECORD
  28. CITY OF CLEVELAND'S NOTICE OF MOTION / APPLICATION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD UNDER R.C. 2711.01 ET.SEQ. DAVID P FRANTZ (0091352) 10/26/2023 - DENIED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more