Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-31
Status INACTIVE
Type Miscellaneous Other
Docket 32 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Justice Johnson
Defendant Frontline Resource Management, Inc. D/b/a Richmond Heights Place
Photo of Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Judge

Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(52719491) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN GEARY [email protected]
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(52719490) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN GEARY [email protected]
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(52719489) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: TAUREAN J. SHATTUCK [email protected]
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(52719488) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: TAUREAN J. SHATTUCK [email protected]
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY(52719487) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: STEVEN E SEASLY [email protected]
  7. UDGMENT ENTRY(52719486) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: STEVEN E SEASLY [email protected]
  8. LAINTIFF HAVING FILED A NOTICE OF DISMISSAL, CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. OTICE FILED BY P1 JUSTICE JOHNSON ATTORNEY TAUREAN J. SHATTUCK 0097364 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 41(A)
  10. OTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FILED NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  11. HE COURT'S 09/05/2023 ENTRY INADVERTENTLY OMITTED THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE PROPOSED BY THE PARTIES IN THEIR 26(F) PLANNING REPORT. THE COURT ADOPTS THE PARTIES' RECOMMENDED DEADLINE, AND THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS TO BE FILED BY 02/23/2024. RESPONSE/REPLY DUE PER OHIO R. CIV. P. 6(C). THE COURT WILL RULE ON ANY PENDING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS NO LESS THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TRIAL DATE. AT THE REQUEST OF ANY PARTY, THE COURT WILL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT ORAL ARGUMENT ON PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. ANY SUCH REQUEST MUST BE MADE BY SEPARATE MOTION AND NOT, E.G., BY ROTE ADDITION TO A PLEADING CAPTION. CLIENTS MUST BE PRESENT AT ORAL ARGUMENT, WHICH SHALL TAKE PLACE ON THE RECORD IN OPEN COURT. IN THE EVENT THAT PERSONAL ATTENDANCE AT ORAL ARGUMENT WILL CREATE AN UNDUE HARDSHIP OR EXPENSE TO THE CLIENT, THE ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THE CLIENT MAY MOVE THE COURT TO ALLOW THE CLIENT TO APPEAR LIVE VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE. CLIENTS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ATTEND BY TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. ASE MGMNT CONFERENCE HELD ON 09/01/2023. COUNSEL FOR BOTH PARTIES PARTICIPATED. INITIAL DISCLOSURES TO BE EXCHANGED BY 09/15/2023. DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 01/19/2024. EXPERT REPORTS FOR PARTY WITH BURDEN OF PROOF ON AN ISSUE DUE 01/19/2024. EXPERT REPORTS (REBUTTAL) DUE 02/23/2024. CASE REFERRED TO COURT MEDIATION ON 09/05/2023. MEDIATION TO BE CONDUCTED AFTER THE 01/19/2024 FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE 05/17/2024 FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. COUNSEL ARE TO PROMPTLY CONTACT THE MEDIATION DEPARTMENT TO SECURE A FIRM DATE FOR MEDIATION. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 05/16/2024 AT 10:00 AM. ALL PARTIES AND CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVES MUST BE PRESENT WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY. IF THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS AN INSURANCE COMPANY, CORPORATION, COMMON CARRIER, OR OTHER ENTITY, THEN THE CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE THE PERSON WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER INTO A BINDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO ALL CLAIMS. A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SHALL SEND A REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORIZED TO ACT ON ITS BEHALF. PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS. THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER DIRECTED TO SUBMIT PRETRIAL STATEMENTS AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE FINAL PRETRIAL. THE PRETRIAL STATEMENTS SHALL SET FORTH THE FOLLOWING: (1) STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LEGAL ISSUES; (2) STATEMENT OF REAL FACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN DISPUTE; (3) STIPULATIONS; (4) LIST OF NON-EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH A BRIEF SUMMARY OF EXPECTED TESTIMONY; (5) LIST OF EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH REPORTS ATTACHED; (6) SPECIAL LEGAL PROBLEMS ANTICIPATED; (8) PRETRIAL MOTIONS CONTEMPLATED; (9) LATEST DEMAND/OFFER. ON SOME OCCASIONS THE COURT'S SCHEDULE MAY PREVENT THE JUDGE FROM CONDUCTING THE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IN PERSON. IF THE ATTORNEYS BELIEVE IT IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY THAT THE JUDGE CONDUCT THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN PERSON, THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO CONTACT THE JUDICIAL STAFF ATTORNEY AT LEAST SEVENTY-TWO (72) HOURS IN ADVANCE TO MAKE SUCH A REQUEST. IN ANY INSTANCE WHERE THE JUDGE HAS A CONFLICT, THE COURT WILL RESET THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE JUDGE TO PRESIDE IN PERSON. JURY TRIAL SET FOR 06/24/2024 AT 09:30 AM. ANY MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SHALL BE MADE IN WRITING AND CAPTIONED "MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE." IF ALL PARTIES OR CERTAIN PARTIES AGREE TO THE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE, SUCH AGREEMENT SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE CAPTION. THE COURT WILL NOT RULE ON AMBIGUOUSLY TITLED MOTIONS WHICH ARE, IN EFFECT, MOTIONS FOR A CONTINUANCE (E.G., A MOTION TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE). ANY MOTION FILED WHICH DOES NOT FULFILL THE CRITERIA ABOVE WILL BE SUMMARILY DENIED OR STRICKEN. THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER DIRECTED TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH THE COURT'S STANDING ORDER ON LITIGATION PREFERENCES, AVAILABLE AS OF THIS WRITING AT HTTPS://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-DEENA-R-CALABRESE. THE PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO REVIEW THE STANDING ORDER REGULARLY FOR UPDATES. THE STANDING ORDER APPLIES UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SUPERSEDED BY JOURNAL ENTRY. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 JUSTICE JOHNSON ATTORNEY TAUREAN J. SHATTUCK 0097364 26(F) PLANNING REPORT
  14. ASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 09/01/2023 AT 10:00 AM. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ORDER SPECIFICALLY REFERENCES CIVIL RULE 26 AS AMENDED EFFECTIVE JULY 2020, IN PARTICULAR THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE PARTIES FILE A WRITTEN DISCOVERY PLAN. THE CMC WILL BE CONDUCTED AS A VIDEO CONFERENCE. PLEASE LOG IN TO THE CONFERENCE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME BY VISITING HTTPS://ZOOM.US/JOIN AND ENTERING THE FOLLOWING MEETING CREDENTIALS: MEETING ID: 826 7750 7085 PASSCODE: 402124 THE URL BELOW SHOULD PROVIDE ONE-CLICK ACCESS TO THE CONFERENCE, BUT PLEASE RELY ON THE MEETING ID AND PASSCODE ABOVE IF THE URL PROMPTS YOU FOR AN ID OR PASSCODE, OR RETURNS AN ERROR: HTTPS://US02WEB.ZOOM.US/J/82677507085?PWD=D2DZEVD5QUXOMKX1RK1QTESXTGN6QT09 TO DISCOURAGE ABUSE, ALL COUNSEL AND OTHER INDIVIDUALS PARTICIPATING MUST HAVE AN ACCOUNT WITH THE ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCING SERVICE (HTTPS://ZOOM.US/). A PAID ZOOM ACCOUNT IS NOT REQUIRED; THE FREE TIER IS SUFFICIENT. PRIOR TO THE EVENT, PLEASE DOWNLOAD ZOOM TO A COMPUTER OR MOBILE DEVICE WITH A CAMERA, MICROPHONE, AND SPEAKERS. NEXT, ENSURE INTERNET BROWSER POP-UP BLOCKERS ARE DISABLED FOR ZOOM. FINALLY, CHECK THE CAMERA, MICROPHONE, AND SPEAKERS ON YOUR DEVICE TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE WORKING. IN ADVANCE OF THE CONFERENCE, COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES SHALL CONFER IN ACCORDANCE WITH OHIO R. CIV. P. 26(F)(1)-(2), AND SHALL THEREAFTER FILE A DISCOVERY PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH OHIO R. CIV. P. 26(F)(3). THE WRITTEN RULE 26(F) DISCOVERY PLAN SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN THREE BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. DURING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, SERVICE ISSUES, DISCOVERY PROGRESS AND SCHEDULE, AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY, EXCHANGE OF EXPERT REPORTS, DATE FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION, ETC., SHALL BE RESOLVED AND INCLUDED IN A BINDING DECREE AND ORDER FORMALIZED. ALL COUNSEL PARTICIPATING SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A BINDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. THE PARTIES SHOULD NOT WAIT FOR THE CMC BEFORE BEGINNING TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY. EXCEPT IN COMPLEX CASES, TRIAL WILL BE SCHEDULED 7 TO 9 MONTHS OUT, WITH FINAL PRETRIALS AND/OR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES SCHEDULED FROM 2 TO 6 WEEKS PRIOR TO TRIAL. ANY PARTY WHO FAILS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CMC WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. NSWER FILED BY D1 FRONTLINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. ATTORNEY STEVEN E SEASLY 0070536 FRONTLINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC.'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  16. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50781963 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/08/2023 FRONTLINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. PROCESSED BY COC 06/14/2023.
  17. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50781962 DELIVERED BY USPS 06/08/2023 FRONTLINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. PROCESSED BY COC 06/14/2023.
  18. AIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS RETURNED SIGNED ON 06/12/2023 WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS FOR DEFENDANT FRONTLINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC.
  19. UMS COMPLAINT(50781963) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: FRONTLINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. C/O CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY 3366 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 103 UPPER ARLINGTON, OH 43221-0000
  20. UMS COMPLAINT(50781962) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: FRONTLINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. 562 RICHMOND ROAD RICHMOND HEIGHTS, OH 44142
  21. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  23. RIT FEE
  24. RIT FEE
  25. UDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  26. EGAL RESEARCH
  27. EGAL NEWS
  28. EGAL AID
  29. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  30. OMPUTER FEE
  31. LERK'S FEE
  32. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID SPITZ LAW FIRM, LLC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.