Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-09-06
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 77 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Third Federal Savings And Loan Association Of Cleveland
Defendant Matthew D Horwath|Unk. Spouse Of Matthew D Horwath|Unk. Spouse Of Jeanne L Horwath|Christine L Gawronski|Unk. Spouse Of Christine L Gawronski|Mark A Horwath|Unk. Spouse Of Mark A Horwath|Unk. Heirs Etc. Jeanne L Horwath Deceased
Photo of Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Judge

Hon. MICHAEL J RUSSO

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. COURT COST ASSESSED THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND BILLED C/O ATTY BILL AMOUNT 318.71 PAID AMOUNT 275 AMOUNT DUE 43.71
  3. COURT COST ASSESSED THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND BILL AMOUNT 318.71 PAID AMOUNT 275 AMOUNT DUE 43.71
  4. PURSUANT TO THE NOTICE OF DISMISSAL FILED HEREIN, THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF'S COSTS. FINAL COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). THIS ENTRY TAKEN BY JUDGE JANET R BURNSIDE. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. NOTICE FILED BY P1 THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND ATTORNEY MAUREEN ZINK DELANEY 0083507 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
  6. NOTICE FILED BY P1 THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND ATTORNEY MAUREEN ZINK DELANEY 0083507 NOTICE OF INTENT TO PROCEED
  7. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION ACCEPTED AS FILED ON 01/26/23. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO FILE A NOTICE OF INTENT TO PROCEED OR A NOTICE OF DISMISSAL ON OR BEFORE 03/01/23. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS HELD IN ABEYANCE TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL TIME FOR SETTLEMENT. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND ATTORNEY MAUREEN ZINK DELANEY 0083507 FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  10. NOTICE FILED BY P1 THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND ATTORNEY MAUREEN ZINK DELANEY 0083507 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED MAGISTRATE'S DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGITRATE'S DECISION
  11. OBJECTION FILED BY P1 THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND ATTORNEY DANIEL R DEPIERO 0063131 FIRST FEDERAL COMMUNITY BANK PREAPPROVAL LETTER
  12. OBJECTION FILED BY P1 THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND ATTORNEY DANIEL R DEPIERO 0063131 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  13. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF SUMMARY JUDGMENT 02/02/2023 - UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED
  14. PRETRIAL HELD BY MAGISTRATE AMY JACKSON. ATTORNEY SASSANO AND ATTORNEY DIPERO APPEARED. THE PARTIES ARE STILL ATTEMPTING A RESOLUTION OF THE CASE BY PRIVATE SALE. DEFENDANTS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MSJ IS NOW DUE 01/29/23. PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN FJR AND A PROPOSED MAGISTRATE'S DECISION ON OR BEFORE 01/29/23. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48657437 RETURNED 10/22/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF JEANNE L HORWATH - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  16. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48657436 RETURNED 10/21/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT GAWRONSKI/CHRISTINE/L - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  17. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48657435 RETURNED 10/21/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF CHRISTINE L GAWRONSKI - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  18. TELEPHONE PRETRIAL SET FOR 12/19/2022 AT 09:15 AM. A TELEPHONE PRETRIAL / SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS SET IN THIS CASE WITH MAGISTRATE AMY JACKSON. ATTORNEYS / SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES ARE TO CALL 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. PRETRIAL HELD BY MAGISTRATE JACKSON. ATTORNEY SASSANO AND ATTORNEY DIPERO APPEARED. DEFENDANT'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO THE PLAINTIFF'S MSJ IS DUE 12/19/22. THE NEXT TELEPHONE PRETRIAL IS SET FOR 12/19/22 AT 9:15 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
  20. USPS RECEIPT NO. 48657434 DELIVERED BY USPS 10/11/2022 HORWATH/MARK/A PROCESSED BY COC 10/19/2022.
  21. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48657433 RETURNED 10/17/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF MARK A HORWATH - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  22. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48657433 RETURNED 10/17/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF MARK A HORWATH - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  23. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48657438 RETURNED 10/06/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D HORWATH - FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  24. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48657439 RETURNED 10/06/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HORWATH/MATTHEW/D - FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  25. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10/19/2022 - HELD IN ABEYANCE
  26. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48657439 RETURNED 10/6/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT HORWATH/MATTHEW/D - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  27. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 48657438 RETURNED 10/6/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D HORWATH - ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  28. SUMS COMPLAINT(48657439) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MATTHEW D HORWATH 3966 LANSDALE ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44118
  29. SUMS COMPLAINT(48657438) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D HORWATH 3966 LANSDALE ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44118
  30. SUMS COMPLAINT(48657437) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF JEANNE L HORWATH 2431 CHANNING ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  31. SUMS COMPLAINT(48657435) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF CHRISTINE L GAWRONSKI 1415 AVONDALE ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  32. SUMS COMPLAINT(48657434) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MARK A HORWATH 4365 NORMA DRIVE SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  33. SUMS COMPLAINT(48657433) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF MARK A HORWATH 4365 NORMA DRIVE SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  34. 48605101 ON 09/26/2022 THE WITHIN NAMED UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D HORWATH WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  35. 48605102 ON 09/27/2022 THE WITHIN NAMED UNK. SPOUSE OF JEANNE L HORWATH WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  36. 48605100 ON 09/26/2022 THE WITHIN NAMED HORWATH/MATTHEW/D WAS NOT SERVED. FAILURE OF SERVICE BY S.P.S. DUE TO FAILURE OF SERVICE.
  37. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  38. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  39. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  40. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 10/19/2022 AT 09:15 AM. A TELEPHONE STATUS / SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS SET IN THIS CASE WITH MAGISTRATE AMY JACKSON. ATTORNEYS / SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES ARE TO CALL 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE. THE ATTORNEYS / SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES ARE TO COMPLY WITH CIVIL RULE 26(F) BY CONFERRING PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ABOUT DATES AND DISCOVERY AND BY PREPARING A WRITTEN DISCOVERY PLAN. NOTICE ISSUED
  41. FAILED POSTCARD RESEND OM(48663153) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MATTHEW D HORWATH 2431 CHANNING RD CLEVELAND, OH 44118-0000
  42. FAILED POSTCARD RESEND OM(48660976) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MATTHEW D HORWATH 2431 CHANNING RD CLEVELAND, OH 44118-0000
  43. FAILED POSTCARD RESEND OM(48660934) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MATTHEW D HORWATH 2431 CHANNING RD CLEVELAND, OH 44118-0000
  44. WRIT FEE
  45. WRIT FEE
  46. WRIT FEE
  47. WRIT FEE
  48. WRIT FEE
  49. WRIT FEE
  50. WRIT FEE
  51. SUMS COMPLAINT(48657436) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHRISTINE L GAWRONSKI 1415 AVONDALE ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  52. WRIT FEE
  53. WRIT FEE
  54. WRIT FEE
  55. FAILURE OF SERVICE WITH ADDRESS CHANGE PROVIDED BY THE POST OFFICE FOR HORWATH/MATTHEW/D AND RESENT OUT BY ORDINARY MAIL.
  56. FAILURE OF SERVICE WITH ADDRESS CHANGE PROVIDED BY THE POST OFFICE FOR HORWATH/MATTHEW/D AND RESENT OUT BY ORDINARY MAIL.
  57. ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) MATTHEW D HORWATH(D1), UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D HORWATH(D2), UNK. SPOUSE OF JEANNE L HORWATH(D3), CHRISTINE L GAWRONSKI(D4), UNK. SPOUSE OF CHRISTINE L GAWRONSKI(D5), MARK A HORWATH(D6), UNK. SPOUSE OF MARK A HORWATH(D7) and UNK. HEIRS ETC. JEANNE L HORWATH DECEASED(D8) ATTORNEY DANIEL R DEPIERO 0063131 DEFENDANTS ANSWERS
  58. ANSWER FILED BY P1 THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND ATTORNEY DANIEL R DEPIERO 0063131 ANSWER
  59. SUMS COMPLAINT(48605102) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF JEANNE L HORWATH 2431 CHANNING ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  60. SUMS COMPLAINT(48605101) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: UNK. SPOUSE OF MATTHEW D HORWATH 3966 LANSDALE ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44118
  61. SUMS COMPLAINT(48605100) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: MATTHEW D HORWATH 3966 LANSDALE ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44118
  62. WRIT FEE
  63. WRIT FEE
  64. WRIT FEE
  65. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND ATTORNEY MAUREEN ZINK DELANEY 0083507 UPDATED PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  66. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  67. MAGISTRATE AMY R JACKSON ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  68. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  69. JUDGE MICHAEL J RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  70. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  71. LEGAL RESEARCH
  72. LEGAL NEWS
  73. LEGAL AID
  74. COMPUTER FEE
  75. CLERK'S FEE
  76. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MAUREEN ZINK DELANEY
  77. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID MAUREEN ZINK DELANEY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more