Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-08-25
Status CLOSED - CLOSED
Type D 5 Fibercel
Docket 121 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Stanton, Joel | Stanton, Melissa | Walsh, Neilli M
Defendant Aziyo Biologics, Inc.
Photo of Hon. Legrow Abigail M

Judge

Hon. Legrow Abigail M

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING PRODUCTS LIABILITY
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  6. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  7. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  8. ANSWER
  9. ANSWER
  10. ANSWER FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES
  11. LETTER
  12. ANSWER FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES
  13. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  14. SO NOTED
  15. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  16. SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  17. STIPULATION
  18. ORDER
  19. LETTER
  20. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  21. ORDER
  22. STIPULATION
  23. ORDER
  24. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  25. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  26. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  27. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  28. MOTION
  29. ORDER
  30. ANSWER TO THE CROSSCLAIM
  31. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  32. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  33. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  34. ORDER
  35. E-MAIL FILED
  36. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  37. E-MAIL FILED
  38. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  39. TRANSCRIPT FILED
  40. ORDER
  41. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  42. MEMORANDUM FILED
  43. MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER
  44. AMENDED ANSWER
  45. AMENDED ANSWER
  46. ANSWER TO THE CROSSCLAIM
  47. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  48. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 10, 2022 PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH EXHIBIT A - REDLINE VERSION OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AMENDED CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED ANSWERS TO FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 67708095
  49. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  50. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 22, 2022 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF JAMES E. DRNEC, ESQUIRE AND PHILLIP M. CASALE, ESQUIRE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANTS DCI DONOR SERVICES, INC., AND NEW MEXICO DONOR SERVICES WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 67741580
  51. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  52. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 22, 2022 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT UPON DEFENDANTS DCI DONOR SERVICES, INC. AND NEW MEXICO DONOR SERVICES WITH EXHIBIT A AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 67742621
  53. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  54. ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 9, 2022 DCI DONOR SERVICES, INC. AND NEW MEXICO DONOR SERVICES' ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT DCI DONOR SERVICES, INC. AND NEW MEXICO DONOR SERVICES' CORRECTED ANSWERS TO FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 67911355
  55. MOTION
  56. MOTION DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 31, 2022 JOINT MOTION TO STAY BY PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, USA, INC. AND SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC WITH ATTACHED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SEPTEMBER 20, 2022 AT 10:00 A.M. PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 67990295
  57. ORDER
  58. ORDER SIGNED BY DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 1, 2022 ORDER SIGNED BY: BRENNAN, DANIELLE GRANTED (PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY) ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 67998897
  59. ANSWER TO THE CROSSCLAIM
  60. ANSWER TO THE CROSSCLAIM DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 ANSWER OF AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., AND SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC TO CROSS-CLAIMS BY DCI DONOR SERVICES, INC. AND NEW MEXICO DONOR SERVICES, INC. WITH ATTACHED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 68137312
  61. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  62. ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 DEFENDANT AZIYO BIOLOGIC, INC.'S ANSWER AND DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH ATTACHED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 68137312
  63. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  64. ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 DEFENDANTS MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. AND SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC'S ANSWER AND DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH ATTACHED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 68137312
  65. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  66. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 25, 2023 LETTER DATED JANUARY 20, 2023 FROM DANIEL J. BROWN, ESQ. TO THE HONORABLE DANIELLE BRENNAN RE: STATUS CONFERENCE ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 68946058
  67. ORDER
  68. ORDER SIGNED BY DATE DOCKETED: FEBRUARY 1, 2023 ORDER SIGNED BY: BRENNAN, DANIELLE GRANTED (LETTER DATED JANUARY 20, 2023 FROM DANIEL J. BROWN, ESQ. TO THE HONORABLE DANIELLE BRENNAN RE: STATUS CONFERENCE) ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 68987454
  69. E-MAIL FILED
  70. E-MAIL FILED DATE DOCKETED: FEBRUARY 2, 2023 EMAIL TO COUNSEL INFORMING THEM THAT THE STATUS CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD ON 2-13-23 AT 1 PM AND TO SCHEDULE THE MATTER VIA COURTSCRIBES. ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 69050501
  71. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  72. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: FEBRUARY 15, 2023 COUNSEL SHALL UPDATE THE COURT WITH A CASE STATUS WITH 10 DAYS FOLLOWING MEDIATION. COUNSEL WAS GIVEN UNTIL APRIL 14, 2023 TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH A STATUS CONCERNING SCHEDULING OF CASES. ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 69145672
  73. E-MAIL FILED
  74. E-MAIL FILED DATE DOCKETED: APRIL 4, 2023 EMAIL TO COUNSEL ADVISING THE IN PERSON SCHEDULING CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD ON APRIL 25, 2023, AT 1:00PM. ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 69715151
  75. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  76. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: APRIL 27, 2023 STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD. COUNSEL IS TO CONFER WITH ONE ANOTHER TO ESTABLISH A PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER, AND SUBMIT SAME WITHIN 10 DAYS (MARCH 5, 2023). ANOTHER STATUS CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD IN 6 MONTHS ON WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 6, 2023 AT 11:00AM IN CONFERENCE ROOM A. A GENERAL DISCOVERY CUT OFF DATE IS SET FOR APRIL 30, 2024. ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 69896527
  77. TRANSCRIPT FILED
  78. TRANSCRIPT FILED DATE DOCKETED: MAY 13, 2023 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TRANSCRIPT OF APRIL 25, 2023, BEFORE THE HONORABLE DANIELLE J. BRENNAN ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 70006565
  79. ORDER
  80. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: MAY 20, 2023 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR FIBERCEL LITIGATION. SIGNED BY JUDGE BRENNAN ON MAY 18, 2023 ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 70048621
  81. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  82. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 28, 2023 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF TODD C. SCHILTZ FOR DEFENDANTS MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. AND SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 71693741
  83. MEMORANDUM FILED
  84. MEMORANDUM FILED DATE DOCKETED: MAY 25, 2024 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS TO ASSERT CROSSCLAIMS WITH ATTACHED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE EXHIBIT A TO MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS TO ASSERT CROSSCLAIMS ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 73098600
  85. MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER
  86. MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER DATE DOCKETED: MAY 25, 2024 DEFENDANT AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS TO ASSERT CROSSCLAIMS WITH ATTACHED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE NOTICE OF DEFENDANT AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS TO ASSERT CROSSCLAIMS TO BE HEARD AT THE CONVENIENCE OF THE COURT PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS TO ASSERT CROSSCLAIMS ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 73098600
  87. AMENDED ANSWER
  88. AMENDED ANSWER DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 5, 2024 DEFENDANTS MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. AND SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC'S AMENDED ANSWER AND DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH CROSSCLAIMS (WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE) ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 73279363
  89. AMENDED ANSWER
  90. AMENDED ANSWER DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 7, 2024 DEFENDANT AZIYO BIOLOGIC, INC.'S AMENDED ANSWER AND DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH ATTACHED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 73318758
  91. ANSWER TO THE CROSSCLAIM
  92. ANSWER TO THE CROSSCLAIM DATE DOCKETED: JUNE 27, 2024 DEFENDANTS MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC. AND SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC'S ANSWER TO CROSSCLAIMS (WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE) ACCEPTED BY: SD TRANSACTION ID: 73482278

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more