Michael J. Warshauer

Meet Michael Warshauer From Michaels interview for the Masters of the Courtroom series on Reel Lawyers.com. Read the transcript. BOARD-CERTIFIED TRIAL ATTORNEY IN ATLANTAKnown for his creative approach to complex cases, Attorney Michael J. Warshauer has a successful track record of handling a variety of complex personal injury claims that result in impressive verdicts and settlements, many of which exceed $1 million and more that exceed $10 million. After three decades in the legal field, Michael is well-respected by the legal community and often is referred other attorneys most complex and difficult cases. He has devoted his career to the representation of catastrophic injury victims and the families of those who have suffered a wrongful death. Email: [email protected] Areas of Focus Many of Michaels cases involve global manufacturers, large healthcare institutions, and Fortune 500 corporations. In the face of intimidation, Michael remains a staunch advocate for his clients. Since the early 90s, he has been considered a preeminent expert on railroad safety laws and has gained nationwide recognition for his landmark work in improving the lives of railroad industry workers. Currently, Michael concentrates on representing those who have been severely injured by medical malpractice, car accidents, motorcycle crashes, and other catastrophic incidents. Notable Accomplishments Throughout the course of his career, Michael has enjoyed numerous awards and certificates. He has been listed as a Georgia Super Lawyer for 19 consecutive years, is rated 10.0 by Avvo, and has obtained an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell®, among many others. He has served in many positions of leadership on various boards and groups, and regularly teaches continuing legal education courses. In addition, he has authored several articles and book chapters on various legal topics. Michael is one of the few board-certified civil trial advocates in Georgia who limit their practice to representing plaintiffs with catastrophic injuries. Bar Admissions Georgia, 1983 Tennessee, 1996 United States Supreme Court, 1997 PublicationsPrepping Your Expert, Trial, September 2012Railroad, Maritime Lawyers See Victor in US Supreme Courts FELA Decision, Lawyers USA, July 2011High-Tech Testing, Trial, Volume 47, No. 6, June 2011Are You a Real Lawyer? Georgia Trial Lawyers Association, Winter 2011Being a Trial Lawyer is Not for the Faint of Heart, Georgia Trial Lawyers Association, Fall 2010Civil Justice is a CONSERVATIVE Value, Georgia Trial Lawyers Association, Summer 2010An Inaugural Message, Georgia Trial Lawyers Association, Spring 2010 A Spouses Guide to the Federal Employers Liability Act - What To Do When Tragedy Strikes The Train Usually Wins, The Crew Too Often Loses - A Multi-Pronged Approach to Recovery for Crew Injuries Caused By Grade Crossing Collisions DAUBERT, JOINER, KUMHO TIRE, and WEISGRAM - What These Cases Stand ForJury Charges - The Beginning and End of All TrialsAre You the Steam Roller or the Pavement? Five Things that Make a DifferenceDemonstrative Evidence in Railroad Cases from Cheap to ExpensiveDemonstrative Evidence: Exhibits for the Rich and the PoorCross Examination of Defendant and Defendants ExpertDirect and Cross Examination at TrialDirect Examination of Expert WitnessesDont Get Railroaded When Conducting a Site InspectionCan the Carrier Reduce Its Damages by Dismissing the Employee?Effective Use of Do It Yourself Focus GroupsBeating the Statute of Repose - New Ideas for Old ProductsOpening ArgumentTrial Exhibits and Demonstrative EvidenceCombating the Intervening Negligence Defense in Product Liability CasesLiar, Liar, Pants on Fire - Impeachment by Cross ExaminationNovel Yet Unconventional Trial Tactics that WorkedMediation of a Medical Negligence Case from the Plaintiffs PerspectiveProper Pleadings Prevent Preemption ProblemsAn Overview of Georgia Product Liability Law, June 2008 O. C. G. A. § 34-9-11.1 is UnconstitutionalPosttraumatic Stress DisorderSuing Railroads: The Train May Win the Battle, But You Can Win the WarStrategies and Uses of ADR from the Plaintiffs PerspectiveEvidentiary and Ethical Considerations of Technologically Presented EvidenceTrial PreparationA Trial Without a Theme is a Trial Without a Purpose and Without a HopeMy Top Ten Tips on Presenting Evidence in TrialWhat Every Plaintiff Lawyer Needs to Know About Daubert: Your Expert May Have a Daubert Problem You Dont Know AboutThe Curious Work of DepositionsPolitics MatterSubrogation UpdateRecognition of a Products Liability Claim, Verdict, 1999Surfing for Lawyers, Verdict, Spring, Fall, Winter, 1998Annual Survey of South Carolina Law, 34 South Carolina Law Review 125, 137 (1982)Chapter: Railroad Law and Defenses, Georgia Jurisprudence-Personal Injury and Torts, §37:1-43-11, Volume 15, Chapter 40, West Publishing, 1994, updated 1998Proper Pleadings Prevent Preemption Problems, Trial, Volume 43, No. 5. pp 68-70. SpeechesEffective use of Demonstrative Evidence with Examples from Real Cases, GTLA 2016 Annual ConventionSummary of Mac v. PC for Lawyers, by Michael Warshauer and Mark Zamora, GTLA 2010 Annual Convention More Michael Warshauer Videos