Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2026-04-02
Status Open
Type Other Tortious Action
Docket 8 entries

Parties

Plaintiff The Pilgrim House, Llc|Cirino, Maria A.|Barbeau, Elizabeth M.
Defendant Horgan, Kenneth J.|Bente, Kevin Scott

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. APPEARANCE electronically filed. Applies To: Jain, Esq., Roshan Duvall (Attorney) on behalf of Bente, Kevin Scott, Horgan, Kenneth J. (Defendant)
  2. Civil action cover sheet filed.
  3. Plaintiff The Pilgrim House, LLC, Maria A. Cirino, Elizabeth M. Barbeau's EMERGENCY Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
  4. The Pilgrim House, LLC, Maria A. Cirino, Elizabeth M. Barbeau's Memorandum in support of Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction
  5. The Pilgrim House, LLC, Maria A. Cirino, Elizabeth M. Barbeau's Memorandum in support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
  6. Plaintiff The Pilgrim House, LLC, Maria A. Cirino, Elizabeth M. Barbeau's EMERGENCY Motion for Short Order of Notice.
  7. Endorsement on Motion for Preliminary Injunction (#3.0): ALLOWED without prejudice , see reason on P#4
  8. Endorsement on Motion for Short Order and Notice (#4.0): Reserved After hearing, given that the defendants are no longer owners of the business at issue, and given that the plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits and that the irreparable harm they will suffer outweighs any potential harm to the defendants the Motion for Preliminary Hearing is ALLOWED without prejudice . The parties agree that no sale of assets involving their matter will take place without further order of the court.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase