Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Dallas County Civil

Court

Dallas County Civil

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2026-02-02
Status OPEN
Type Cntr Cnsmr Com Debt
Docket 10 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Midland Credit Management Inc.
Defendant Nguyen, Christopher
Photo of Hon. Tobolowsky Emily

Judge

Hon. Tobolowsky Emily

Dallas County (TX)

Texas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. 04/16/2026 RETURN OF SERVICE View Document EXECUTED CITATION - CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN Comment EXECUTED CITATION - CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN
  2. 02/02/2026 ORIGINAL PETITION View Document PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION
  3. 02/02/2026 REQUEST FOR SERVICE View Document REQUEST FOR SERVICE
  4. 02/02/2026 ISSUE CITATION View Document ISSUE CITATION-CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN
  5. 02/04/2026 CITATION Served 04/15/2026 Anticipated Server ESERVE Anticipated Method Actual Server PRIVATE PROCESS SERVER Returned 04/16/2026 Comment CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN
  6. 03/09/2026 MOTION-SUBSTITUTE SERVICE View Document MOTION - SUBSTITUTE SERVICE
  7. 03/09/2026 PROPOSED ORDER/JUDGMENT View Document PROPOSED ORDER FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE T.R.C.P. 106 B Comment PROPOSED ORDER FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE T.R.C.P. 106 B
  8. 03/12/2026 MOTION HEARING View Document PROPOSED ORDER FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE T.R.C.P. 106 B View Document MOTION - SUBSTITUTE SERVICE Judicial Officer MUNOZ, NICOLE Hearing Time 1:30 PM Comment RULE 106 BY SUBMISSION
  9. 04/09/2026 ORDER - SUBSTITUTE SERVICE View Document ORDER - SUBSTITUTE SERVICE
  10. 04/10/2026 E-SERVED COPY OF ORDER View Document DC-26-01772 Order.pdf View Document E-Serve Orders Cover Letter.pdf

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more