Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2026-03-26
Status ACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 94 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lakeview Loan Servicing, Llc
Defendant Brittany M. Gura|Gerard Djubasak|Jane Doe|John Francis Russell|The United States Of America, Secretary Of Housing And Urban Developme|The Bank Of New York Mellon, Fka The Bank Of New York, As Successor In
Photo of Hon. PETER J CORRIGAN

Judge

Hon. PETER J CORRIGAN

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. 60124700 ON 04/06/2026 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED GURA/BRITTANY/M. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  3. 60124703 ON 04/06/2026 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED RUSSELL/JOHN/FRANCIS BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  4. 60124702 ON 04/06/2026 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED DOE/JANE/ BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  5. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60111319 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/03/2026 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS SUCCESSOR-IN PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  6. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60111318 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/02/2026 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPME PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  7. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60111315 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/02/2026 RUSSELL/JOHN/FRANCIS PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  8. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60111313 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/02/2026 DOE/JANE/ PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  9. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60111312 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/02/2026 DJUBASAK/GERARD/ PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  10. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60111311 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/02/2026 DJUBASAK/GERARD/ PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  11. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60111310 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/02/2026 GURA/BRITTANY/M. PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  12. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60127241 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/06/2026 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS SUCCESSOR-IN PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60127239 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/07/2026 RUSSELL/JOHN/FRANCIS PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  14. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60127238 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/06/2026 DOE/JANE/ PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  15. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60127237 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/06/2026 DJUBASAK/GERARD/ PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  16. USPS RECEIPT NO. 60127236 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/06/2026 GURA/BRITTANY/M. PROCESSED BY COC 04/08/2026.
  17. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED SERVICE RETURN
  18. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED SERVICE RETURN
  19. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED SERVICE RETURN
  20. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED SERVICE RETURN
  21. SUMS COMPLAINT(60127241) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS SUCCESSOR-IN CO CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, AS RA 4400 EASTON COMMONS WAY SUITE 125 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
  22. SUMS COMPLAINT(60127240) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPME CO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE WASHINGTON, DC 20530
  23. SUMS COMPLAINT(60127239) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN FRANCIS RUSSELL 4220 LAMBERT ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44121
  24. SUMS COMPLAINT(60127238) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE 4220 LAMBERT ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  25. SUMS COMPLAINT(60127237) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GERARD DJUBASAK 4220 LAMBERT ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  26. SUMS COMPLAINT(60127236) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BRITTANY M. GURA 4220 LAMBERT ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  27. SUMS COMPLAINT(60124703) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JOHN FRANCIS RUSSELL 4220 LAMBERT ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44121
  28. SUMS COMPLAINT(60124702) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JANE DOE 4220 LAMBERT ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  29. SUMS COMPLAINT(60124701) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: GERARD DJUBASAK 4220 LAMBERT ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  30. SUMS COMPLAINT(60124700) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: BRITTANY M. GURA 4220 LAMBERT ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  31. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  32. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  33. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  35. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  36. WRIT FEE
  37. WRIT FEE
  38. WRIT FEE
  39. WRIT FEE
  40. WRIT FEE
  41. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  42. WRIT FEE
  43. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  44. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  45. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  46. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  47. WRIT FEE
  48. WRIT FEE
  49. WRIT FEE
  50. WRIT FEE
  51. SUMS COMPLAINT(60111318) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPME C/O US ATTORNEY FOR THE N. DISTRICT 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVE SUITE #400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113-0000
  52. SUMS COMPLAINT(60111317) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPME CO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE WASHINGTON, DC 20530
  53. SUMS COMPLAINT(60111316) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN FRANCIS RUSSELL 3688 MENLO RD FLOOR 1 CLEVELAND, OH 44120-0000
  54. SUMS COMPLAINT(60111315) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN FRANCIS RUSSELL 4220 LAMBERT ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44121
  55. SUMS COMPLAINT(60111314) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE 15701 ROWENA AVE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137-0000
  56. SUMS COMPLAINT(60111313) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANE DOE 4220 LAMBERT ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  57. SUMS COMPLAINT(60111312) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GERARD DJUBASAK 15701 ROWENA AVE MAPLE HEIGHTS, OH 44137-0000
  58. SUMS COMPLAINT(60111311) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GERARD DJUBASAK 4220 LAMBERT ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  59. SUMS COMPLAINT(60111310) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BRITTANY M. GURA 4220 LAMBERT ROAD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  60. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  61. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  62. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  63. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  64. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  65. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  66. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  67. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  68. WRIT FEE
  69. SUMS COMPLAINT(60111319) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS SUCCESSOR-IN CO CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, AS RA 4400 EASTON COMMONS WAY SUITE 125 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
  70. WRIT FEE
  71. WRIT FEE
  72. WRIT FEE
  73. WRIT FEE
  74. WRIT FEE
  75. WRIT FEE
  76. WRIT FEE
  77. WRIT FEE
  78. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  79. WRIT FEE
  80. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  81. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  82. MAGISTRATE JOHN T DYKE ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  83. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  84. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  85. JUDGE CASSANDRA COLLIER-WILLIAMS ASSIGNED (RANDOM); RE-FILED CASE, REASSIGNED TO ORIGINAL JUDGE, JUDGE PETER J CORRIGAN
  86. JUDGE CASSANDRA COLLIER-WILLIAMS ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  87. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  88. LEGAL RESEARCH
  89. LEGAL NEWS
  90. LEGAL AID
  91. COMPUTER FEE
  92. CLERK'S FEE
  93. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID KIMBERLY FULKERSON
  94. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID KIMBERLY FULKERSON

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more