Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-23
Status Open
Type Mass Antitrust Act, G. L. C. 93 9
Docket 77 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Stanisic, Nikola
Defendant Gpi Ma Aii, Inc.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Endorsement on Stipulation of dismissal (#33.0): Other action taken The Court accepts the parties stipulation and dismisses the matter (Gant, J)(Dated: 3/20/26)
  2. Complaint electronically filed. eFiled 6/23/25
  3. Civil action cover sheet filed. Rec'd 6/23/25
  4. Affidavit of Nikola Stanisic eFiled 6/23/25
  5. Affidavit of Filip Jovic, Esq. In Support of Attorney's Fees eFiled 6/23/25
  6. Demand for jury trial entered.
  7. Claim filed under 93A
  8. Notice of 93A complaint sent to Attorney General
  9. Docket Note: 1 Summons Sent 6/25/25
  10. Case selected for review pursuant to S.J.C. "Order Regarding Amount in Controversy" Judge: Hickey, Mary K
  11. Amended: original complaint filed by Nikola Stanisic (E-Filed 07/14/2025)
  12. Acceptance of Service I, Charles M. Wallen, Esq. counsel for the Defendant, GPI MA-AII, Inc. d/b/a Audi Westwood, do hereby waive formal service of process and accept service of the First Amended Complaint, with the understanding that this waiver of formal service of process and acceptance of service does not waive Defendant's right to raise any non-service-related defenses. (E-Filed 07/16/2025)mk
  13. Attorney appearance On this date A. Eli Leino, Esq. added for Defendant GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood
  14. Attorney appearance electronically filed of Leino, Esq., A. Eli (Attorney) on behalf of GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood (Defendant) (E-Filed 07/16/2025)mk
  15. Attorney appearance On this date Charles Matthew Wallen, IV, Esq. added for Defendant GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood
  16. Attorney appearance electronically filed of Wallen, IV, Esq. , Charles Matthew (Attorney) on behalf of GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood (Defendant)
  17. Plaintiff Nikola Stanisic's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (E-Filed 08/06/2025)
  18. Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A (Emailed 08/08/2025) Applies To: Jovic, Esq., Filip (Attorney) on behalf of Stanisic, Nikola (Plaintiff)
  19. Endorsement on Motion to (#7.0): file second amended complaint. ALLOWED (dated 8/28/2025) ns ni
  20. ORDER: ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (dated 8/28/2025) certified copies sent ni
  21. Amended: SECOND amended complaint filed by Nikola Stanisic
  22. Pre-Trial ORDER: On 8/28/25, the Court (Sullivan, J) ALLOWED Plaintiff's Motion to File Second Amended Complaint (See Dockets 7and 8). The Honorable William F. Sullivan further ORDERS: That following proper service of the Second Amended Complaint (Docket 9.0) the Defendant GPI MA-AII, Inc d/b/a Audi Westwood is Granted thirty (30) additional days from the date of this Order to file its Answer.; Rule 16 Conference in person will be scheduled. (Sullivan, J)(dated; 8/29/25) ns pl Judge: Sullivan, Hon. William F
  23. Civil action cover sheet filed. (Rec'd 9/2/2025) (Revised)
  24. Answer to SECOND amended complaint by Defendant, GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood (E-Filed 09/08/2025)
  25. Plaintiff Nikola Stanisic's Motion to strike non complaint responses in defendants answer, to strike insufficient affirmative defenses and to strike defendants jury demand efiled 9/11/25
  26. Reply/Sur-reply plaintiffs reply in support of motion to strike non compliant responses in defendants answer, to strike insufficient affirmative defenses efiled 9/11/25
  27. Opposition to motion to strike non compliant responses in defendants answer, to strike insufficient affirmative defenses, and to strike jury demand filed by GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood efiled 9/11/25
  28. Affidavit of compliance with superior court 9C efiled 9/11/25
  29. Defendant GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood's EMERGENCY Motion for stay and Rule 11 Sanctions rec'd 9/16/25
  30. Affidavit filed by Defendant GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood in support of emergency motion for stay and Rule 11 Sanctions rec'd 9/16/25
  31. GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood's Memorandum in support of defendants motion to stay and for Rule 11 Sanctions rec'd 9/16/25
  32. Plaintiff Nikola Stanisic's Motion for reconsideration rec'd 9/16/25
  33. Attorney appearance of Edward J. Sackman on behalf of Defendant, GPI MA-All, Inc. dba Audi Westwood electronically filed. (E-Filed 09/09/2025)
  34. Objection to motion for reconsideration filed by GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood efiled 9/15
  35. Nikola Stanisic's Reply Memorandum opposing defendants objection to motion for reconsideration and requesting appropriate relief efiled 9/15/25
  36. Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A efiled 9/15/25 Applies To: Stanisic, Nikola (Plaintiff); Jovic, Esq., Filip (Attorney) on behalf of Stanisic, Nikola (Plaintiff)
  37. ORDER: ORDER (SUA SPONTE) TO PROVISIONALLY IMPOUND PROTECTED HEALTH RECORDS(Sullivan, J)(dated; 9/16/25) certified copy sent pl Judge: Sullivan, Hon. William F
  38. Matter taken under advisement: Rule 16 Conference scheduled on: 09/17/2025 02:00 PM Has been: Held - Under advisement Hon. William F Sullivan, Presiding
  39. Endorsement on Motion to strike non-compliant responses in defendant's answer, to strike insufficient affirmative defenses, and to strike defendant's jury demand. (#14.0): DENIED (dated 9/18/2025) ns ni
  40. Endorsement on Motion for stay and for Rule 11 sanctions (#15.0): After hearing, Plaintiff's counsel is found to have entered false quotations and citations in pleadings and correspondence with opposing counsel. Counsel has stated that this was by accident. Counsel is reminded of his obligations under Rule 3.3 of MRCP and Rule 11 of the M. R. Civ. P. Motion is DENIED (dated 9/18/2025) ns ni
  41. Endorsement on Motion for reconsideration. (#16.0): DENIED (dated 9/17/2025) ns ni Judge: Sullivan, Hon. William F
  42. Plaintiff Nikola Stanisic's Motion for Accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (Rec'd 09/19/2025)mk
  43. Plaintiff Nikola Stanisic's Motion for Protective Order (E-Mailed)mk
  44. Objection to (P#19.0) Motion for Protective Order -- filed by GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood
  45. Reply/Sur-reply Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion for Protective Order and Request for Order Regulating AI-Related Inquiries and Emergency Practice
  46. Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A Applies To: Stanisic, Nikola (Plaintiff)
  47. Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9C Applies To: Stanisic, Nikola (Plaintiff)
  48. Exhibits/Appendix Applies To: Stanisic, Nikola (Plaintiff)
  49. General correspondence regarding Letter from Attorney Filip Jovic, Esq.
  50. Endorsement on motion for protective order (#19.0): DENIED without prejudice. (Sullivan, J)(dated; 11/24/25) ns pl Judge: Sullivan, Hon. William F
  51. Event Result:: Motion Hearing scheduled on: 12/12/2025 02:00 PM Has been: Rescheduled For the following reason: Request of Plaintiff Hon. William F Sullivan, Presiding
  52. Event Result:: Rule 16 Conference scheduled on: 12/12/2025 02:45 PM Has been: Rescheduled For the following reason: Request of Plaintiff Hon. William F Sullivan, Presiding
  53. Attorney withdrawal of A. Eli Leino on behalf of Defendant, GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood electronically filed. (E-Filed 12/08/2025)
  54. Plaintiff Nikola Stanisic's EMERGENCY Motion for Judgment on All Claims Based Upon Defendant's Fraud on the Court, and in the alternative for: an order compelling production of native-format source records and metadata; a Rule 36 admissions order; an ESI preservation / forensic protocol; and expedited hearing and case management. (Emailed 12/18/2025)
  55. Affidavit of attorney in support of emergency motion and 9C compliance
  56. Event Result:: Motion Hearing scheduled on: 12/19/2025 03:00 PM Has been: Held as Scheduled Hon. William F Sullivan, Presiding
  57. Event Result:: Rule 16 Conference scheduled on: 12/19/2025 03:30 PM Has been: Held as Scheduled Hon. William F Sullivan, Presiding
  58. Plaintiff Nikola Stanisic's EMERGENCY Motion for Judgment on all claims based upon defendant's fraud on the Court; and, in the alternative, for (a) an Order compelling production of Native Format Source Records and Metadata, (b) a Rule 36 Admission Order, (c) ESI preservation' forensic protocol, and (d) expedited hearing/case management consistent with Rule 1. (received 12/22/2025)
  59. Affidavit of Filip Jovic, Esq. (Rule 9C Compliance and in support of Emergency Motion) (received 12/22/2025)
  60. Endorsement on Motion for Judgment on all claims based upon defendant's fraud on the Court; and in the alternative, for (a) an Order compelling production of native-format source records and metadate, (b) a Rule 36 admissions Order, (c) ESI preservations/forensic protocol, and (d) expedited hearing/case management consistent with Rule 1 (#24.0): DENIED without prejudice for failure to file per Rule 9A. (dated 12/19/2025) ns ni Judge: Sullivan, Hon. William F
  61. Plaintiff Nikola Stanisic's Motion for Protective Order Staying/Sequencing Plaintiff's Deposition and Motion to Compel Production of Native-Format ESI(Including CDK Source Records, Metadata, and Audit/Change History); and for Related ESI Reservation Relief(E-Filed 01/13/2026)mk
  62. Nikola Stanisic's Reply Memorandum in support of Motion for Protective Order Staying/Sequencing Plaintiff's Deposition and Motion to Compel Production of Native-Format ESI(Including CDK Source Records, Metadata, and Audit/Change History); and for Related ESI Reservation Relief(E-Filed 01/13/2026)mk
  63. Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9C Applies To: Jovic, Esq., Filip (Attorney) on behalf of Stanisic, Nikola (Plaintiff)
  64. General correspondence regarding Letter Regarding Plaintiff Nikola Stanisic's Motion for Protective Order Staying/Sequencing Plaintiff's Deposition and Motion to Compel Production of Native-Format ESI(Including CDK Source Records, Metadata, and Audit/Change History); and for Related ESI Reservation Relief
  65. General correspondence regarding Cover Letter from Attorney Jovic, Esq., Filip
  66. Defendant GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood's Notice of Submission of an Opposition (E-Filed 01/15/2026)mk
  67. Opposition to (P#26.0) Motion for Protective Order Staying/Sequencing Plaintiff's Deposition and Motion to Compel Production of Native-Format ESI(Including CDK Source Records, Metadata, and Audit/Change History); and for Related ESI Reservation Relief -- filed by GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood
  68. Defendant GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood's Submission of Proof of Rule 9C Compliance (E-Filed 01/15/2026)mk
  69. General correspondence regarding Email from Filip Jovic, Esq. to Clerk Masse Re: Continuance/ADA Request.
  70. ORDER: ORDER: (Gant, J)(dated; 1/30/2026) certified copy sent pl Judge: Gant, Hon. Ira
  71. Plaintiff Nikola Stanisic's EMERGENCY, EX PARTE Motion to Impound/Seal Docket Entries 29 and 30 (and Associated Attachments/Images) to Prevent Prejudice and Invasion of Privacy; and for Related Relief (E-Filed 01/30/2026)
  72. Nikola Stanisic's Memorandum in support of Emergency Ex Parte Motion to Impound/Seal Docket Entries 29 and 30 (E-Filed 01/30/2026)
  73. Affidavit of Filip Jovic, Esq. in support of Plaintiff's Emergency Ex Parte Motion to Impound/Seal Docket Entries 29 and 30 (E-Filed 01/30/2026)
  74. Docket Note: As of today's date a Certified Copy of the docket sheet has been placed with p#30.0 in impounded. P#30.0 having been deleted per Judge's Order of 2/10/26 on p#32.0.
  75. Endorsement on Motion to impound/seal docket entries 29 and 30 (and associated attachments/images) to prevent prejudice and invasion of privacy; and for related relief. (#32.0): Other action taken After review, Allowed in Part. The Clerk's Office will impound and/or remove from Masscourts the text of the Court's 1/27/26 endorsement as the endorsed document itself-Paper #30- has been impounded. See Order at Paper#31. However, the Plaintiff's and the Plaintiff's counsel's request to impound or seal (which are different actions with different standards) Paper #29 is denied. After review the Court finds no information in that document that is private or sensitive in nature; merely the email arguments and representations of the parties counsel primarily Attorney Jovic. Moreover, the Court cautions Attorney Jovic to cease using "emergency" and "ex parte" motion practice where itis not necessary. (Gant, J)(dated; 2/10/26) ns pl Judge: Gant, Hon. Ira
  76. Matter taken under advisement: Rule 16 Conference scheduled on: 02/18/2026 02:00 PM Has been: Held - Under advisement Hon. Ira Gant, Presiding
  77. Party(s) file Stipulation of Dismissal In accordance with the provisions of Mass. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a)(1), the Parties by and through undersigned counsel hereby jointly stipulate to the dismissal of all claims in the above-referenced matter, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party, and all rights of appeal waived. Applies To: Stanisic, Nikola (Plaintiff); GPI MA-AII, Inc. Doing Business as Audi Westwood (Defendant)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more