Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oakland Co

Court

Oakland Co

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-02-20
Type Ni
Docket 64 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bell Curtis|Stanley Deon
Defendant Richmond Jvaughty|Auto Club Ins Assn|Mackinaw Adminstrators
Photo of Hon. NANCI J. GRANT

Judge

Hon. NANCI J. GRANT

Oakland County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS ISSUED
  2. DATE SET FOR CASE EVAL ON 01232026 10:00 AM
  3. STIP/ORD FILED SUB ATTY/DFT
  4. NOTICE FILED TAKING DEP
  5. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  6. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  7. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  8. NOTICE FILED TAKING DEP/POS
  9. ADJOURN FOR INVESTIGATION/DISCOVERY
  10. ADJ-COUNSEL 02102026 TO 04092026 BY ORDER
  11. DATE SET FOR TRIAL ON 04092026 08 30 AM Y 07
  12. PROCEEDING TO BE HELD IN-PERSON
  13. ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT FILED TRIAL/SCHED ORD
  14. ADJOURNED PER CASE EVALUATION CLERK FROM 11032025
  15. DATE SET FOR CASE EVAL ON 01232026 NO TIME SET
  16. DEFENSE MOTION ADJ SCHED ORDER 60 DAYS - GRANTED
  17. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 09242025 JUDGE 07
  18. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  19. MOTION FILED TO ADJ DATES/BRF/NOH/POS/MACKINAW ADMIN
  20. DATE SET FOR CASE EVAL ON 11032025 11:00 AM
  21. WITNESS LIST FILED AMD/EXH/POS/DFT
  22. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  23. DEFENSE MOTION COMPEL RESPONSES -G-
  24. DEFENSE MOTION COMPEL DEON STANLEYS DEPOSITION -G-
  25. ORDER FILED RE DFT MTN COMPEL
  26. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 08272025 JUDGE 07
  27. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  28. MOTION FILED TO COMPEL/BRF/NOH/POS/MACKINAW ADMIN
  29. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 08272025 JUDGE 07
  30. NOTICE OF HEARING FILED /POS
  31. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  32. ORDER FILED FINAL PRETRIAL
  33. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 08062025 JUDGE 07
  34. MOTION FILED COMPEL RES TO DISC REQ/NOH/POS/BRF/DFT
  35. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  36. NOTICE FILED TAKING DEP/POS
  37. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  38. NOTICE FILED TAKING DEP/POS
  39. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  40. SCHEDULING ORDER FILED
  41. SCHEDULING ORDER WRITTEN
  42. 09/04/2025 EXPERT DATE.
  43. 11/03/2025 CASE EVALUATION DATE.
  44. 09/04/2025 WITNESS DATE.
  45. 11/03/2025 MOTION DATE.
  46. 10/03/2025 DISCOVERY DATE.
  47. 02/10/2026 TRIAL DATE.
  48. DATE SET FOR TRIAL ON 02102026 08 30 AM
  49. REQUEST FILED TO PLF/ADMIT/POS
  50. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  51. INTERROGATORIES FILED TO PLF/REQ PROD DOCS/POS
  52. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  53. WITNESS LIST FILED /PRELIM/POS/DFT
  54. JURY DEMAND FILED /POS
  55. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED /AFM/POS/DFT
  56. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  57. DISCLOSURE FILED INITIAL/POS/DFT
  58. WITNESS LIST FILED EXH/POS/DFT
  59. JURY DEMAND FILED
  60. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED AFF DEF/APP/MACKINAW
  61. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  62. COMPLAINT FILED
  63. SUMMONS ISSUED
  64. SUMMONS ISSUED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more