Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Polk County

Court

Polk County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-12-09
Type Nega Negligence Auto
Docket 32 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Vaughn, Sarah Kaitlyn 1540 Sailpoint Drive Bartow Fl 33830
Defendant Fitzpatrick, Carolyn M. 291 Lower County Road Dennis Ma 02639
Photo of Hon. Jennifer a Swenson

Judge

Hon. Jennifer a Swenson

Polk County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  2. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  3. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN - GENERAL TRACK
  4. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESSES
  5. PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES TO DEFENDANT, CAROLYN M. FITZPATRICK
  6. PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES TO DEFENDANT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
  7. COMPANY
  8. PLAINTIFF'S RULE 1.280(A) INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  9. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, CAROLYN M. FITZPATRICK
  10. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT, CAROLYN M. FITZPATRICK
  11. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT, CAROLYN M. FITZPATRICK
  12. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
  13. COMPANY
  14. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  15. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  16. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK-CAROLYN M. FITZPATRICK
  17. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK-STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  18. RETURN OF SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED - STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE ISURANCE COMPANY
  19. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED - STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY BY
  20. SERVING LYNETTE COLEMAN
  21. SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED - CAROLYN M FITZPATRICK
  22. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE DISCLOSURE AND E-MAIL DESIGNATION
  23. DEFENDANT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYS ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  24. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESSES
  25. DEAMND FOR JURY TRIAL
  26. DEFENDANT CAROLYN M. FITZPATRICK'S ANSWER / AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  27. PLAINTIFFS DENIAL OF DEFENDANT CAROLYN M FITZPATRICKS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
  28. PLAINTIFFS DENIAL OF DEFENDANT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
  29. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST DEFENDNAT STATE FARM
  30. MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  31. DEFENDANT CAROLYN M FITZPATRICKS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  32. DEFENDANT CAROLYN M. FITZPATRICK'S NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more