Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Polk County

Court

Polk County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-08-14
Type Othic Insurance Claim
Docket 43 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lugo, Nancy
Defendant Homesite Insurance Company P.o. Box 5300 Binghamton Ny 13902
Photo of Hon. Keith Spoto

Judge

Hon. Keith Spoto

Polk County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  2. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK- HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY
  3. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN - GENERAL TRACK
  4. COMPLAINT
  5. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED - HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY BY SERVING LYNETTE COLEMAN
  6. ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO DEFENDANT
  7. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING RULE 1.280 INITIAL DISCLOSURE
  8. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.280(A)(1) INITIAL DISCOVERY
  9. DISCLOSURE
  10. PLAINTIFFS REPLY AND AVODIANCE OF DEFENDANTS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  11. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT
  12. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT
  13. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
  14. PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS WRITTEN
  15. DISCOVERY REQUESTS PRUSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1 202
  16. DEFENDANT COMPANYS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLANTIFFS WRITTEN DISCOVERY REQUESTS
  17. Calendar entry added for: 02/04/2026 11:45 AM
  18. Reason: HEAR
  19. DEFENDANT COMPANYS AMENDED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS WRITTEN DISCOVERY R
  20. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF HEARING
  21. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM
  22. NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM OF DEFENDANT'S DESIGNATED CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE
  23. AND DESK ADJUSTER
  24. NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM
  25. DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  26. DEFENDANTS PRIVILEGE LOG
  27. DEFENDANTS RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  28. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
  29. DEFENDANT'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFFS
  30. DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  31. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF JOINT PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO PLAINTIFFS
  32. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF VERIFIED ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
  33. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS DISCOVERY REQUETS
  34. NOTICE OF MEDIATION CONFERENCE
  35. Calendar entry deleted for: 02/04/2026 11:45 AM
  36. LETTER FROM ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
  37. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING
  38. LETTER FROM ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
  39. AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS DISCOVERY REQUESTS
  40. DEFENDANTS MEDIATION CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY
  41. PLAINTIFFS RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  42. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIED ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  43. PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more