Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2026-01-14
Type Petition For Writ Of Mandamus
Docket 21 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hargues, Randy Lee,
Defendant Office Of Administrative Hearings, oklahoma Department Of Human Services,
Photo of Hon. MOWDY, D. CLAY

Judge

Hon. MOWDY, D. CLAY

Atoka County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. GREEN CARD
  2. PAUPER'S AFFIDAVIT
  3. VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
  4. AFFIDAVIT OF IRREPARABLE HARM A
  5. PETITIONER'S INDEX OF EXHIBITS
  6. ALTERNATIVE WRIT OF MANDAMUS
  7. GREEN CARD
  8. NOTICE OF DEFENDANT'S VIOLATION OF ALTERNATIVE WRIT AND CEASE AND DESIST ORDER
  9. PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED STATEMENT OF COSTS
  10. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PEREMEPTORY WRIT AND FINAL JUDGMENT
  11. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PEREMPTORY WRIT
  12. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DEFENDANT'S VIOLATION OF ALTERNATIVE WRIT AND CEASE AND DESIST ORDER
  13. CASE COMES ON FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. ALL PARTIES APPEAR IN PERSON. COURT FINDS THAT ADMINISTERED REMEDIES HAVE NOT BEEN EXHAUSTED AND THIS COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION OVER PETITIONER'S REQUEST AT THIS TIME. CASES SET FOR THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 AT 9:00 AM.
  14. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH COURT DIRECTIVE
  15. REQUEST FOR DIRECTOR'S REVIEW
  16. PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED RESPONSE AND MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  17. PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND PREMPTORY WRIT
  18. PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF REGARDING VESTED DEFAULT AND MANDATORY ISSUANCE OF PEREMPTORY WRIT
  19. GREEN CARD
  20. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF ERRATA REGARDING STATUTORY CITATIONS
  21. PETITIONER APPEARS IN PERSON. STATE OF OKLAHOMA FAILS TO APPEAR. CASE WAS SET AT 9:00 AM AND CALLED AGAIN AT 10:00 AM. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES FAILS TO APPEAR AT EITHER TIMES. DEFENDANT ORDERD TO FILE PROOF OF REQUEST FOR DIRECTOR'S REVIEW. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE OF OKLAHOMA ORDERED TO APPEAR ON THE 12TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 AT 9:00 AM.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more