Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-11-06
Status OPEN
Type Auto Negligence Circuit
Docket 62 entries

Parties

Plaintiff George Skorsak|Vladlena Vavilova
Defendant Lucy Litvinenko|Progressive American Insurance Company
Photo of Hon. Hamilton Rebecca

Judge

Hon. Hamilton Rebecca

Pinellas County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. IVIL COVER SHEET - E-FILED Amount: 100001.00
  2. OT. OF SERV. OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
  3. OT. OF SERV. OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
  4. OT. OF SERV. OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
  5. OT. OF SERV. OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
  6. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  7. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  8. MENDED NOTICE MEDIATION CONFERENCE
  9. OTICE OF MEDIATION CONFERENCE
  10. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  11. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  12. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  13. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  14. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  15. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  16. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  17. RIVILEGE LOG
  18. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  19. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  20. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  21. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  22. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  23. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  24. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  25. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  26. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  27. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  28. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  29. OTICE OF SERVICE SUPP INTERROGATORIES
  30. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  31. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  32. OTICE OF SERVICE SUPP INTERROGATORIES
  33. OTICE OF DISCLOSURE
  34. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  35. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  36. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  37. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  38. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  39. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  40. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  41. OTICE OF SERVICE OF
  42. OTICE OF SERVICE OF
  43. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: LITVINENKO, LUCY
  44. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: LITVINENKO, LUCY
  45. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  46. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  47. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  48. OTICE OF SERVICE OF
  49. OTICE OF SERVICE OF
  50. ISCLOSURE
  51. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  52. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  53. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  54. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  55. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,
  56. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,
  57. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: LITVINENKO, LUCY
  58. ESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESS(ES)
  59. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,
  60. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: LITVINENKO, LUCY
  61. TANDING ORDER ASSIGNING GENERAL CIVIL CASE TRACK
  62. OMPLAINT WITH DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.