Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-11-07
Status Briefing in Progress
Type Civil Appeal Administrative Agency Proper Person
Docket 33 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Filed Appellant's Reply to Response to Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. (PER ORDER FILED ON 3/16/26, DOCUMENT PLACED BACK ON DOCKET) (SC)
  2. Filed Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (SC)
  3. Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee/Proper Person. No action will be taken on this matter until filing fee is paid. Due Date: 14 days. (SC)
  4. Issued Notice of Mandatory Electronic Filing. All attorneys are required to file electronically. To: Mary N. Madrid Huck. (SC)
  5. Filed (SEALED) District Court Order Denying In Forma Pauperis. Certified copy of order filed in district court on November 5,2025. (SC)
  6. Filing Fee Paid. $250.00 from Ashley Jackson. Money Order 29722694624 (SC)
  7. Filed Proper Person Docketing Statement. (SC)
  8. Filed Respondent's Response to Docketing Statement. (SC)
  9. Issued Notice Regarding Deadlines. Transcript request form due: 14 days; Docketing statement due: 21 days; Opening/Informal brief due: 120 days. (SC)
  10. Filed Proper Person (Appellant) Ashley Jackson Request For Transcripts Of Proceedings. Dates Requested: 06/04/2025 Court Reporter: Lisa Lizotte Dept 1 Filed in District Court on: 12/03/2025 (SC)
  11. Filed Order/Transmit Record. Record due: 30 days. (SC)
  12. Filed District Court's Record on Appeal - Vols. 1-16. (SC)
  13. Filed (SEALED) District Court Documents. Added to Record on Appeal as pages: 34 to 43, 48 to 51 and 102 to 106. (SC)
  14. Filed Notice from Court Reporter. Lisa Lizotte stating that the requested transcripts were delivered. Dates of transcripts: 06/04/2025 (SC)
  15. Filed Appellant's Emergency Motion to Stay Pending Appeal. (STRICKEN PER 02/10/26 ORDER). (SC)
  16. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient "Certificate of Emergency". Corrected document due: 7 days. (SC)
  17. Filed Appellant's Corrected Emergency Motion to Stay Pending Appeal. (STRICKEN PER 02/13/26 ORDER). (SC)
  18. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient emergency motion. Corrected emergency motion due: February 17, 2026 (SC)
  19. Filed Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay. (SC)
  20. Filed Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay. (SC)
  21. Filed Respondent's Response to Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (STRICKEN PER ORDER FILED ON 2/23/2026). (SC)
  22. Filed Proper Person Reply to Response of Emergency Motion. (REJECTED PER NOTICE FILED ON 02/23/2026). (SC)
  23. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Response to Emergency Motion. Corrected Response due: 7 days from the date of this order. (SC)
  24. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document. (Proper Person Reply to Response of Emergency Motion.) (SC)
  25. Filed Appellant's Emergency Motion for Expedited Consideration. (STRICKEN PER 03/2/26 ORDER). (SC)
  26. Filed Respondent's Response to Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. (REJECTED PER NOTICE FILED ON 03/02/2026). (SC)
  27. Filed Proper Person Reply to Response of Emergency Motion. (REJECTED PER NOTICE FILED ON 03/02/2026). (SC)
  28. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Appellant's Emergency Motion for Expedited Consideration. Corrected motion due: 7 days. (SC)
  29. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document. (Respondent's Response to Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal.) (SC)
  30. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document. (Proper Person Reply to Response of Emergency Motion.) (SC)
  31. Filed Appellant's Emergency Motion Under NRAP 27(E) Motion to Clarify and Reinstate Briefing Schedule (Action Necessary as Soon as Possible Before March 06,2026). (SC)
  32. Filed Order Denying Stay. Currently before the court is appellant's emergency motion for stay and emergency motion to clarify and reinstate briefing schedule. The emergency motion for stay was filed on February 14, 2026. After respondent's response was stricken for deficiencies, a corrected response was timely filed on February 25, 2026. Appellant's reply was filed that same day, but both the response and the reply were rejected on the basis that the motion to which they pertained was stricken. As appellant's motion to clarify points out, the basis for rejection was mistaken, and the documents should not have been rejected. Accordingly, appellant's motion to clarify is granted to the following extent. The clerk of this court shall retrieve the February 25 response and reply and file them on the docket. Regarding the stay motion, having reviewed the parties' arguments, we agree with respondent that appellant has failed to comply with NRAP 8(a)(2)(A)(ii) by demonstrating that "the district court denied [a stay] motion or failed to afford the relief requested." Based on this signed agreement, reflected in a written November 12, 2025, order, the district court vacated the scheduled hearing on the stay motion. Thus, the district court did not consider and deny a stay. As appellant has not complied with NRAP 8(a) but rather agreed that her license revocation would not be stayed, we deny appellant's stay motion. Any relief from the stipulation must be sought in the district court in the first instance. A26-KP/RP/LB (SC)
  33. Filed Respondent's Response to Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. (PER ORDER FILED ON 3/16/26, DOCUMENT PLACED BACK ON DOCKET) (SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more