Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-18
Status Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Type Original Proceeding Civil Proper Person Writ Petition
Docket 15 entries
Disposition petition is denied

Docket Entries

  1. Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.(SC)
  2. Filed Proper Person Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (SC)
  3. Filed Proper Person Appendix to Petition for Writ of Prohibition - Index. (SC)
  4. Filed Proper Person Appendix to Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (SC)
  5. Filed Proper Person Affidavit and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (SC)
  6. Filed Proper Person's Motion to Supplement the Petition and Record. (SC)
  7. Filed Proper Person Emergency Motion Under NRAP 27(e) to Supplement the Petition and Record. (SC)
  8. Filed Order Waiving Filing Fee. Petitioner is seeking a waiver of the filing fee for this original proceeding, asserting indigence and inability to pay it. Good cause having been demonstrated, the motion is granted. NRAP 21(g). No filing fee is due in this matter. (SC)
  9. Filed Proper Person's Emergency Motion to Supplement the Emergency Motion Under NRAP 27(e) and Record Under NRAP 30(f). (SC)
  10. Filed Order Denying Petition for Writ of Prohibition. Petitioner's July 22, July 30, and August 4, 2025, motions for leave to supplement the petition and record are granted. However, after reviewing the materials submitted by petitioner, we conclude that petitioner has not met his burden of demonstrating that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. "ORDER the petition DENIED." DH/RP/LS (SC)
  11. Filed Proper Person's Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. (SC)
  12. Filed Petitioner's Emergency Motion to Supplement Petition for En Banc Reconsideration and Record Under NRAP 40(A), NRAP 27(e), and NRAP 30(f). (SC)
  13. Filed Order Denying Motion. Petitioner has filed an emergency motion to supplement his petition for en banc reconsideration and the record in these proceedings. However, review of the proposed supplement reveals that, in it, petitioner seeks the disqualification of all justices of this court. Under NRAP 35(a), "[a] separate motion for disqualification must be filed for each justice or judge being challenged." Thus, motions that, like the proposed supplement to the petition, seek disqualification of multiple judges are not permitted. Accordingly, the motion to supplement is denied. (SC)
  14. Filed Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Having considered the petition on file herein, we have concluded that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. NRAP 40A. Accordingly, the petition is denied. EN BANC (SC)
  15. Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur.(SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more