Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2026-03-05
Status Active
Type Temporary Restraining Order
Docket 12 entries

Parties

Plaintiff O'harran, Natalie N.|O'harran, Michael J.
Defendant Pascal, Danege

Docket Entries

  1. Order as to 26CV65 and 26CV66 Denied as to prayers 2 and 3 Judge: Sherring, Hon. Neil
  2. Attorney Appearance On this date 03/05/2026 Pro Se added for O'Harran, Michael J.
  3. Attorney Appearance On this date 03/05/2026 Pro Se added for Pascal, Danege
  4. Request for Temporary Restraining Order filed
  5. Civil Filing Fee due. Receipt: 34227 Date: 03/05/2026
  6. SURCHARGE 185C:Entry of Action filed (Section 466 - M.G.L. c. 185C, 19) SURCHARGE Receipt: 34227 Date: 03/05/2026
  7. Statement of Material Facts or Request for TRO
  8. Proposed Exhibit Filed by Natalie N. O'Harran, Michael J. O'Harran
  9. Proposed Exhibit Filed by Michael J. O'Harran, Natalie N. O'Harran
  10. Scheduled Event: Hearing on Application for TRO Date: 03/10/2026 Time: 10:00 AM Result: Held
  11. An Order of Notice has been issued. The following party(s) needs to be given notice: Danege Pascal. The number of days for notice: Defendant accepts service The Party(s) to show cause why a Temporary restraining order. Order of Notice was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Natalie N. O'Harran 103 York Street, Stoughton, MA 02072 Plaintiff: Michael J. O'Harran [email protected] Defendant: Danege Pascal 11 Devon Commons Lane, Braintree, MA 02184 Sent On: 03/06/2026 09:13:52
  12. Event Resulted: Hearing on Application for TRO scheduled on: 03/10/2026 10:00 AM Has been: Held For the following reason: Court Action Comments: Judge: Both Parties: Hearing on Application for TRO held: after hearing, the court issued the following order for 26CV65 AND 26CV66 the defendant shall inquire with the moving company, and if it is permissible with the moving company to move the plaintiff's property to the Norwood address that has been provided in court. If it is not permissible, the Plaintiff's items will go to the Peabody storage facility. The application (26CV66) is DENIED as to prayers 2 and 3 as follows, the court does not find that there is a requirement for alternative housing or a food allowance in this scenario. The court does not see any evidence from the board of health that the premises have been deemed uninhabitable. This is not an uncommon occurrence. Therefore, the TRO is DENIED as to prayers 2 and 3. Canton 7 ftr: 10:35:49 a.m. ACM DM Hon. Neil Sherring, Presiding

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more