Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Travis County

Court

Travis County

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-30
Status Open
Type Defamation
Docket 20 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Scott, Natasha
Defendant Scott, Stephen James
Photo of Hon. 201 St, District Court

Judge

Hon. 201 St, District Court

Travis County

Texas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. MOTION PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR HEARING ON FINAL ORDER AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT Party: Plaintiff SCOTT, NATASHA
  3. STATEMENT OF INABILITY TO AFFORD COSTS STATEMENT OF INABILITY TO AFFORD PAYMENT OF COURT COSTS OR AN APPEAL BOND
  5. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED SERVICE- STEPHEN JAMES SCOTT Party: Defendant SCOTT, STEPHEN JAMES
  7. MOTION MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROPOSED ORDER Party: Plaintiff SCOTT, NATASHA
  9. MOTION FOR RECUSAL MOTION TO RECUSE OR DISQUALIFY JUDGE FOR BIAS AND MISCONDUCT Party: Plaintiff SCOTT, NATASHA
  11. JUDGMENT NOTICE MAILED
  13. COURT CORRESPONDENCE LETTER TO JUDGE WALDRIP FROM JUDGE AMY CLARK MEACHUM
  15. ORDER (Judicial Officer: MEACHUM, AMY CLARK) ORDER OF REFERRAL TO REGIONAL PRESIDING JUDGE
  16. ORDER CIVIL ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - JUDGE DIBRELL W. WALDRIP TO 201ST D1GN25004666 MTN TO RECUSE
  17. ORDER CIVIL ORDER SUMMARILY DENYING MOTION TO RECUSE - JUDGE DIBRELL W. WALDRIP TO 201ST D1GN25004666
  18. MOTION PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR COURT DATE AND REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT HEARING Party: Plaintiff SCOTT, NATASHA
  19. PLEADING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED PETITION AND STATEMENT OF FACTS Party: Plaintiff SCOTT, NATASHA
  20. PLEADING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED PETITION Party: Plaintiff SCOTT, NATASHA

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more