Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-12-30
Status ACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 62 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Pennymac Loan Services, Llc
Defendant James Bradley Thompson|Susanna Thompson|George H. Thompson|Janice L. Thompson|Lvnv Funding, Llc|Capital One, National Association Sbm Discover Bank|Portfolio Recovery Associates, Llc|United States Of America|State Of Ohio, Department Of Taxation
Photo of Hon. PETER J CORRIGAN

Judge

Hon. PETER J CORRIGAN

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 59109823 ADDRESSED TO GEORGE H. THOMPSON(D3) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  3. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 59109824 ADDRESSED TO JANICE L. THOMPSON(D4) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  4. ANSWER FILED BY D10 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION ATTORNEY MELANIE CORNELIUS 0029808 THE STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
  5. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59109586 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/05/2026 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 01/14/2026.
  6. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59109584 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/08/2026 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PROCESSED BY COC 01/14/2026.
  7. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59109585 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/02/2026 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PROCESSED BY COC 01/07/2026.
  8. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59109583 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/02/2026 PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 01/07/2026.
  9. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59109582 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/02/2026 CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION SBM DISCOVER BANK PROCESSED BY COC 01/07/2026.
  10. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59109580 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/03/2026 THOMPSON/JANICE/L. PROCESSED BY COC 01/07/2026.
  11. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59109579 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/03/2026 THOMPSON/GEORGE/H. PROCESSED BY COC 01/07/2026.
  12. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59109578 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/03/2026 THOMPSON/SUSANNA/ PROCESSED BY COC 01/07/2026.
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59109577 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/03/2026 THOMPSON/JAMES/BRADLEY PROCESSED BY COC 01/07/2026.
  14. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59109581 DELIVERED BY USPS 01/02/2026 LVNV FUNDING, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 01/07/2026.
  15. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109824) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANICE L. THOMPSON 21249 CLAYTHORNE ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44122-0000
  16. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109823) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GEORGE H. THOMPSON 21249 CLAYHORNE ROAD CLEVELAND, OH 44122-0000
  17. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109586) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 50 E BROAD STREET, 14TH FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  18. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109585) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNE 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  19. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109584) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NORTHWEST WASHINGTON, DC 20530
  20. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109583) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC C/O CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY, S/ 1160 DUBLIN ROAD, SUITE 400 COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  21. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109582) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION SBM DISCOVER BANK C/O CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, S/A 4400 EASTON COMMONS WAY, SUITE 125 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
  22. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109581) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: LVNV FUNDING, LLC C/O CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY 1160 DUBLIN ROAD, SUITE 400 COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  23. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109580) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JANICE L. THOMPSON 2579 EDGERTON ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  24. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109579) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GEORGE H. THOMPSON 2579 EDGERTON ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  25. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109578) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SUSANNA THOMPSON 2579 EDGERTON ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  26. SUMS COMPLAINT(59109577) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JAMES BRADLEY THOMPSON 2579 EDGERTON ROAD UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, OH 44118
  27. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  28. MAGISTRATE JOHN T DYKE ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  29. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  30. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  31. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  32. WRIT FEE
  33. WRIT FEE
  34. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  35. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  36. WRIT FEE
  37. WRIT FEE
  38. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  39. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  40. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  41. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  42. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  43. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  44. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  45. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  46. WRIT FEE
  47. WRIT FEE
  48. WRIT FEE
  49. WRIT FEE
  50. WRIT FEE
  51. WRIT FEE
  52. WRIT FEE
  53. WRIT FEE
  54. JUDGE PETER J CORRIGAN ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  55. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  56. LEGAL RESEARCH
  57. LEGAL NEWS
  58. LEGAL AID
  59. COMPUTER FEE
  60. CLERK'S FEE
  61. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG
  62. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more