Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-21
Status Closed
Type Ota Other
Docket 19 entries
Disposition judgment entered

Parties

Plaintiff Harkins, Michael R.
Defendant Corbett Development

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 09/19/2022 10:30 AM Has been: Held via video Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding September 19, 2022. Hearing held via video conference. Attorney Jordan L. Shapiro appeared for the plaintiff. No other parties appeared. This is one of four consolidated cases: Land Court Case No. 22 MISC 000028 (KTS); Land Court Case No. 000029 (KTS); Land Court Case No. 22 MISC 000030 (KTS); and Land Court Case No. 22 MISC 000031 (KTS). Attorney Shapiro filed a Motion for Judgment in case number 22 MISC 000028 and stated his intent for the motion to apply to each of the consolidated cases, including 22 MISC 000031. Following colloquy, the court ALLOWED the Motion for Judgment in each consolidated case. (Smith, J.).
  2. Case assigned to the Average Track per Land Court Standing Order 1:04.
  3. Land Court miscellaneous filing fee Receipt: 427881 Date: 01/21/2022
  4. Land Court surcharge Receipt: 427881 Date: 01/21/2022
  5. Land Court summons Receipt: 427881 Date: 01/21/2022
  6. Uniform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
  7. The case has been assigned to the A Track. Notice sent. Notice of Judge and Track Assignment was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Jordan L Shapiro, Esq. Shapiro and Hender 105 Salem St PO Box 392, Malden, MA 02148 Defendant: Corbett Development No addresses available null: File Copy Sent On: 02/09/2022 11:40:41
  8. Event Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Case Management Conference Date: 03/22/2022 Time: 11:30 AM
  9. Event Resulted: Case Management Conference scheduled on: 03/22/2022 11:30 AM Has been: Held via video Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding March 22, 2022. Case management conference held by videoconference. Attorney Jordan L. Shapiro appeared for the plaintiff. No other party appeared. The plaintiff has brought this action pursuant to G.L. c.237 seeking judicial confirmation of the validity of a 2019 sale of land and a building in Lowell pursuant to a sheriff's deed. There are three related cases: Land Court Case No. 22 MISC 000028 (KTS); Land Court Case No. 22 MISC 000029 (KTS); and Land Court Case No. 22 MISC 000030 (KTS). Following colloquy, the court consolidated these cases. The court scheduled a further status conference to be held by videoconference at 9:30 a.m. on July 7, 2022. (Smith, J.).
  10. Summons returned to Court with service on Corbett Development filed. Left at last and usual place of abode of Edward P. O'Neill III, president on March 8, 2022.
  11. Order Appointing Edward A. Rainen as Title Examiner in Support of Writ of Entry Under G.L. c.237, issued. (Copies emailed to Attorneys Jordan Shapiro and Ed Rainen) Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T.
  12. Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Status Conference Date: 07/07/2022 Time: 09:30 AM
  13. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 07/07/2022 09:30 AM Has been: Held via video Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding July 7, 2022. Status conference held by videoconference. Attorney Jordan L. Shapiro appeared for the plaintiff. No other party appeared. This is one of four consolidated cases: Land Court Case No. 22 MISC 000028 (KTS); Land Court Case No. 22 MISC 000029 (KTS); Land Court Case No. 22 MISC 000030 (KTS); and Land Court Case No. 22 MISC 000031 (KTS). Attorney Shapiro represented that he has received title examinations for the four respective properties from title examiner Edward A. Rainen, Esq. Mr. Shapiro requested additional time to confer with the Land Court title examiners regarding the potential effect of recording confirmatory deeds prior to filing a motion for judgment. Following colloquy, the court scheduled a status conference to be held via videoconference at 10:00 a.m. on August 18, 2022. (Smith, J.).
  14. Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Status Conference Date: 08/18/2022 Time: 10:00 AM
  15. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 08/18/2022 10:00 AM Has been: Continued Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding
  16. Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Status Conference Date: 09/19/2022 Time: 10:30 AM
  17. Motion for Judgment, filed.
  18. Motion for Judgment, ALLOWED (Smith, J.).
  19. Judgment entered. (Copy emailed to Attorney Jordan Shapiro) Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.