Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Texas Supreme Court

Court

Texas Supreme Court

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2026-03-13
Type Petition For Writ Of Mandamus
Docket 8 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed. Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on behalf of N.A.
  2. Notice received. Notice of Designation of Lead Counsel filed on behalf of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services.
  3. Call received. Call received from counsel for Relator.
  4. Response to Motion filed. Response to Motion to Stay filed on behalf of the Texas Departement of Family and Protective Services.
  5. Response to Motion filed. Response to Motion to Stay filed on behalf of Jared Brandt, et al.
  6. Amicus Curiae Letter Received. Amicus Curiae Letter received on behalf of the Family Freedom Project, submitted by Emily Cook of Chandler, Cook and Fitzgerald, PLLC of Liberty, Texas.
  7. Supreme Court of Texas Ordered Response. Response ordered stating: "The Supreme Court of Texas orders that real party in interest the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, real parties in interest Jared and Courtney Brandt, and the attorney ad litem for the child, K.M., file responses to the emergency motion for temporary relief filed in the above-referenced case. The response is due in this office by 4:30 pm, Friday, March 13, 2026."
  8. Motion to Stay Filed. Emergency Motion to Stay filed on behalf of N.A.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more