Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-03
Status Briefing in Progress
Type Civil Appeal Administrative Agency Proper Person
Docket 33 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Filed Order Granting Motion. Appellant's reply brief due: March 23, 2026. (SC)
  2. Filed Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (SC)
  3. Issued Notice Regarding Deadlines. Transcript request form due: 14 days; Docketing statement due: 21 days; Opening/Informal brief due: 120 days. (SC)
  4. Filed Proper Person Motion to Waive the Costs Associated with the Preparation and Delivery of Transcripts. (SC)
  5. Filed Appellant's Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 06/12/25, 03/06/25, and 05/04/23. To Court Reporter: Stacey Ray. (SC)
  6. Filed Proper Person Motion Requesting for Leave to Waive Requirement that Supporting Documents be Attached to the Docketing Statement. (SC)
  7. Filed Proper Person Docketing Statement Civil. (SC)
  8. Filed Certification. The clerk of the Nevada Supreme Court certifies to the Honorable Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, that on July 16, 2025, appellant filed with the Supreme Court a notice that this appeal draws into question the constitutionality of NRS 205.4605 and NRS 603A. See NRAP 44. (SC)
  9. Filed Order/Transmit Record. Record due: 30 days. (SC)
  10. Filed Respondents' Opposition to Motion to Waive Requirements to Attach Supporting Documents to Docketing Statement(REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED ON 07-24-2025)(SC)
  11. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document(Respondents' Opposition to Motion to Waive Requirements to Attach Supporting Documents to Docketing Statement)(SC)
  12. Filed Order Regarding Motions. Appellant has filed a pro se motion to waive the costs associated with the preparation and delivery of transcripts. The motion is denied without prejudice. Appellant has also filed a motion for leave to waive the requirement that supporting documents be attached to the docketing statement. In this instance only, given that appellant is proceeding in this matter without the payment of fees, the motion is granted. The docketing statement was filed on July 16, 2025. (SC)
  13. Filed Record on Appeal ASHLEY MICHAUD vs. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION; ET AL. - A854654 - VOL 1(SC)
  14. Filed Record on Appeal ASHLEY MICHAUD vs. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION; ET AL. - A854654 - VOL 2 (SC)
  15. Filed Record on Appeal ASHLEY MICHAUD vs. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION; ET AL. - A854654 - VOL 3 (SC)
  16. Filed Record on Appeal ASHLEY MICHAUD vs. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION; ET AL. - A854654 - VOL 4 (SC)
  17. Filed Proper Person Motion to Disqualify Attorney(SC)
  18. Filed Proper Person Motion to Waive the Cost Associated with the Preparation and Delivery of Transcripts. (SC)
  19. Filed Respondents' Opposition to Motion to Disqualify Attorney (SC)
  20. Filed Proper Person Ashley Michaud Reply to Opposition (SC)
  21. Filed Order Denying Motion to Disqualify and Granting Motion for Waiver of Costs. Appellant has filed a pro se motion to disqualify counsel for respondents. The motion is denied. Appellant has also filed a motion for waiver of costs associated with preparation and delivery of transcripts. The motion is granted. NRAP 9(a)(9). Within 7 days of the date of this order, the district court shall order these transcripts to be prepared at county expense in accordance with NRS 12.015(3). Id. Court recorder Stacy Ray shall have 37 days from the date of this order to prepare the transcripts and file a certificate of delivery with this court. (SC)
  22. Filed Order Correcting August 8, 2025, Order Denying Motion to Disqualify and Granting Motion for Waiver of Costs. This court's order entered August 8, 2025, erroneously directed the preparation of a transcript from proceedings held on May 5, 2023. The correct date of the proceedings is May 4, 2023. Accordingly, within 7 days of the date of this order, the district court shall order the transcript of proceedings held on May 4, 2023, to be prepared at county expense in accordance with NRS 12.015(3). Court recorder Stacy Ray's court reporter certificate due: 37 days. (SC)
  23. Filed Proper Person Ashley Michaud Motion for Remedy (SC)
  24. Filed Order Denying Motion. Any documents-including orders-filed in the district court in the underlying matter before entry of the challenged order are subject to review in this appeal. However, documents filed in the district court after entry of the challenged order will generally not be considered in the context of an appeal. Accordingly, appellant's motion to require the district court to supplement the record on appeal with documents filed or dated after entry of the challenged order is denied. Appellant's requests that this court (1) order the district court to deny requests for further extensions of time to produce orders, (2) find respondent's counsel in contempt of a district court order, and (3) grant an extension of time to file the opening brief are all denied. Any other requests within the motion are also denied. (SC)
  25. Filed Notice from Court Reporter. Stacey Ray, stating that the requested transcripts were delivered. Dates of transcripts: 05/04/23, 03/06/25, and 06/12/25. (SC)
  26. Filed Record on Appeal ASHLEY MICHAUD vs. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION; ET AL. - A854654 - VOL 5 (SC)
  27. Filed Respondent's Notice of Appearance for Amy K. Steelman. (Counsel Updated.) (SC)
  28. Filed Appellant's Opening Brief (SC)
  29. Filed Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Answering Brief (SC)
  30. Filed Proper Person Ashley Michaud, Opposition to Respondents Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Answering Brief (SC)
  31. Filed Order Granting Motion. Respondents have filed a motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief. Appellant opposes the motion. The motion is granted. Respondents shall have until January 8, 2026, to file and serve the answering brief. (SC)
  32. Filed ESD Respondent's Answering Brief (SC)
  33. Filed Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time for Filing of the Appellant's Reply Brief (SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more