Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-27
Status Submitted for Decision
Type Original Proceeding Civil Mandamus
Docket 45 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Filed Order/Submit on Briefs. Cause appearing, oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision before a panel of this court as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. (SC)
  2. Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus Compelling The Granting of Motion for Summary Judgment Due to Expiration of Statute of Limitations. (SC)
  3. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Index. (SC)
  4. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Volume I of IV. (SC)
  5. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Volume II of IV. (SC)
  6. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Volume III of IV. (SC)
  7. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Volume IV of IV. (SC)
  8. Filed Order Directing Answer. Answer due: 21 days. Petitioner shall have 14 days from service of the answer to file and serve any reply. (SC)
  9. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Real party in interest Alma R. Nunez de Avelar's answer to writ petition due: August 26, 2025. (SC)
  10. Filed Petitioner Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC Motion for Stay Pending Decision on Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  11. Filed Petitioner's Notice of Non-Opposition to Motion for Stay Pending Resolution of Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  12. Filed Real Party Motion for Extension of Time to File Real Party in Interest Alma R. Nunez De Avelar's Answer to Writ Petition (First Request)(SC)
  13. Filed Petitioner's Opposition to Real Party In Interest's Motion to Extend Time to Submit Answer to Writ Petition (SC)
  14. Filed Order Granting Stay and Denying Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Petitioner has filed a motion for stay of the district court proceedings in the underlying matter, pending this court's decision on its original writ petition. Real parties in interest have not opposed the motion. Having considered petitioner's motion and the relevant factors, see NRAP 8(c), the motion for stay is granted. The proceedings in district court case no. A-24-885425-C, shall be stayed pending resolution of this writ petition. Real party in interest Alma R. Nunez De Avelar has filed a motion requesting a second extension of time (30 days) to file an answer against issuance of the writ. Petitioner opposes the motion. Counsel fails to demonstrate extraordinary and compelling circumstances to warrant a 30-day extension. The motion is denied. Ms. Nunez De Avelar shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve an answer against issuance of the writ. On July 22, 2025, this court directed real party in interest Paul Wilkes to file and serve, by August 12, 2025, his answer against issuance of the writ. To date, Mr. Wilkes has failed to file an answer or to otherwise communicate with this court. Mr. Wilkes shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve an answer against issuance of the writ. B25-KP/EC/PL (SC)
  15. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma R. Nunez De Avelar's Answering Brief to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (STRICKEN PER ORDER FILED ON 9/19/25) (SC)
  16. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma R. Nunez De Avelar's Chronological Index for Appendix to Real Party In Interest Alma Nunez de Avelar's Answering Brief to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (STRICKEN PER ORDER FILED ON 9/19/25) (SC)
  17. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma Nunez de Avelar's Appendix Volume I(SC)
  18. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma Nunez de Avelar's Appendix Volume II(SC)
  19. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma Nunez de Avelar's Appendix Volume III(SC)
  20. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma Nunez de Avelar's Appendix Volume IV(SC)
  21. Filed Petitioner's Letter. (SC)
  22. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Answer to Petition for Writ along with Index to Appendix. Corrected documents due: 14 days from the date of this order from Real Party in Interest Alma R. Nunez de Avelar. (SC)
  23. Filed Real Party in Interest (Paul Wilkes, M.D.) Notice of Appearance for Katherine J. Gordon. (SC)
  24. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma R. Nunez De Avelar's Answering Brief to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (SC)
  25. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma Nunez de Avelar's Chronological and Alphabetical Index (SC)
  26. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma Nunez de Avelar's Appendix Volume I (SC)
  27. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma Nunez de Avelar's Appendix Volume II (SC)
  28. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma Nunez de Avelar's Appendix Volume III (SC)
  29. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma Nunez de Avelar's Appendix Volume IV (SC)
  30. Filed Reply in Further Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus Compelling the Granting of Motion for Summary Judgment Due to Expiration of Statute of Limitations (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED ON 10-07-2025) (SC)
  31. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document(Reply to Answer to Writ Petition )(SC)
  32. Filed Real Party in Interest Heidi Brown Notice Of No Answer of Additional Party Paul Wilkes, M.D (Deficient Document) (REJECTED PER PHONE CALL)(SC)
  33. Filed Petitioner's Reply in Further Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus Compelling the Granting of Motion for Summary Judgment Due to Expiration of Statute of Limitation.(SC)
  34. Filed Real Party in Interest Heidi Brown Notice Of No Answer of Additional Party Paul Wilkes, M.D (Deficient Document) (REJECTED PER PHONE CALL) (Duplicate) (SC)
  35. Filed Real Party in Interest Notice of No Answer of Additional Party Paul Wilkes, M.D (SC)
  36. Filed Order. Petitioner has filed a letter in which it states its position that real party in interest's answering brief should be stricken. This court takes no action regarding the letter. (SC)
  37. Filed Petitioner's Motion To Strike Real Party In Interest's Answer To Writ Petition (SC)
  38. Filed Petitioner's Notice of Non-Opposition to Motion to Strike Real Party In Interest's Answer Alma R. Nunez de Avelar (SC)
  39. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma R. Nunez de Avelar's Response to Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss and Notice of Non-opposition (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUED ON 10-27-2025) (SC)
  40. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document. (Real Party in Interest Alma R. Nunez de Avelar's Response to Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss and Notice of Non-opposition) (SC)
  41. Filed Real Party in Interest Alma R. Nunez De Avelar's Motion for Leave to File Late Response to Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss (SC)
  42. Filed Petitioner's Opposition to Real Party in Interest's Motion to File Late Opposition to Motion to Strike Answering Brief (SC)
  43. Filed Joinder of Additional Party Paul Wilkes, M.D. to Petitioner's Opposition to Real Party in Interest's Motion to File Late Opposition to Motion to Strike Answer Brief (SC)
  44. Filed Order. Ms. Nunez de Avelar's answer, appendices, and index volumes were filed electronically at 5:52 pm on September 18. This court then issued an order striking the answer and index volumes on September 19, 2025, because they did not comply with this court's formatting rules. The September 19 order directed Ms. Nunez de Avelar to correct the deficiencies and re-file the documents on or before October 3, 2025. On October 1, 2025, Ms. Nunez de Avelar re-filed an answer and index volumes that comply with this court's formatting rules. Before the court is petitioner's October 15, 2025, motion to strike Ms. Nunez de Avelar's answer, appendices, and index volumes. Ms. Nunez de Avelar timely filed her answer, appendices, and index volumes on September 18. See NRAP 26(a)(4)(A) (stating that for purposes of electronic filing, the last day ends at 11:59 pm in the court's local time). Subsequently, Ms. Nunez de Avelar timely re-filed an answer and index volumes that comply with this court's rules as directed in this court's September 19 order. Accordingly, petitioner's motion to strike Ms. Nunez de Avelar's answer, appendices, and index volumes is denied. fn1[Ms. Nunez de Avelar's motion to file a late response to the motion to strike is denied.] (SC)
  45. Filed Petitioner's Notice of Substitution of Counsel Adam Garth as counsel for Petitioner (Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC.) (SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more