Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-12-17
Type Nega Negligence Auto
Docket 29 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Schauer Nathal N 3021 Ernest Dr #a Auburndale Fl 33823
Defendant Beeson Miranda M 307 Granada Rd Auburndale Fl 33823
Photo of Hon. Keith Spoto

Judge

Hon. Keith Spoto

Polk County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK- MIRANDA M BEESON
  4. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN - GENERAL TRACK
  5. SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED - MIRANDA M. BEESON
  6. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESS
  7. DEFENDANTS ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  8. DEFENDANTS AMENDED ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  9. REPLY TO DEFENDANTS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  10. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 1.280 DISCLOSURES
  11. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTIAL DISCLOUSRES
  12. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  13. REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  14. NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES
  15. SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  16. SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  17. NOTICE OF SERVING SUPPLEMENTAL INTERROGATORIES
  18. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 1.280(A)(1) DISCLOSURES
  19. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  20. DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF
  21. DEFENDANT'S FIRST NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTY
  22. REQUEST FOR DEPOSITION
  23. DEFENDANT MIRANDA M. BEESON CERTIFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION
  24. REQUEST FOR COPIES
  25. DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  26. DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  27. DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  28. DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  29. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.