Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Polk County

Court

Polk County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-12-16
Type Nega Negligence Auto
Docket 39 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Tant, Justin E
Defendant Blanchfield, Dana M 2594 Thornhill Rd Auburndale Fl 33823
Photo of Hon. Keith Spoto

Judge

Hon. Keith Spoto

Polk County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN - GENERAL TRACK
  4. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT DANA M BLANCHFIELD
  5. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT BLANCHFIELDS TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK INC
  6. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT DANA M BLANCHFIELD
  7. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVICE INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT BLANCHFIELDS TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK INC
  8. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT DANA M BLANCHFIELD
  9. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT BLANCHFIELDS TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK INC
  10. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES TO DEFENDANT DANA M BLANCHFIELD
  11. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES TO DEFENDANT BLANCHFIELDS TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK
  12. INC
  13. PLAINTIFFS WITNESS LIST
  14. PLAINTIFFS EXHIBIT LIST
  15. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK- DANA M BLANCHFIELD
  16. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK- BLANCHFIELDS TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK INC
  17. SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED- BLANCHFIELD'S TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK INC BY SERVING BARBARA BLANCHFIELD
  18. SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED- DANA M BLANCHARD BY SERVING BARBARA BLANCHFIELD
  19. NOTIE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES
  20. DEFENDANTS ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  21. DEFENDANTS DANA M BLANCHFIELD AND BLANCHFIELDS TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK INCS RULE 1.280 INITIAL
  22. DISCLOSURES
  23. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS DANA M BLACHFIELD AND BLANCHFIELDS TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK INCS
  24. FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF JUSTIN E TANT
  25. DEFENDANTS DANA M BLANCHFIELD AND BLANCHFIELDS TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK INCS FIRST REQUEST FOR
  26. PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF JUDTIN E TANT
  27. DEFENDANT'S PRIVILEGE LOG
  28. DEFENDANT, BLANCHFIELD'S TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK, INC.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR
  29. ADMISSIONS
  30. DEFENDANT, DANA M. BLANCHFIELD'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  31. DEFENDANT, DANA M. BLANCHFIELD'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  32. OF DOCUMENTS
  33. DEFENDANT, BLANCHFIELD'S TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK, INC.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR
  34. PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  35. DEFENDANT, DANA M. BLANCHFIELD'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF VERIFIED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF
  36. INTERROGATORIES
  37. DEFENDANT, BLANCHFIELD'S TRUCK AND TRACTOR WORK, INC.'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET
  38. OF INTERROGATORIES
  39. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS' INTERROGATORIES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more