Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Pinellas County

Court

Pinellas County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-12-19
Status OPEN
Type Auto Negligence Circuit
Docket 62 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Joshua Nemoy|Gloria Nemoy
Defendant Randy Cohen|Pinellas Provision Corporation
Photo of Hon. Ramsberger Thomas M

Judge

Hon. Ramsberger Thomas M

Pinellas County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. IVIL COVER SHEET - E-FILED Amount: 50001.00
  2. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  3. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  4. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  5. RIVILEGE LOG
  6. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  7. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  8. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  9. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  10. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  11. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  12. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  13. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  14. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  15. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  16. ENIAL OF AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  17. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  18. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  19. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  20. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  21. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  22. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  23. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  24. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  25. ISCLOSURE
  26. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: COHEN, RANDY MICHAEL
  27. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  28. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  29. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  30. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  31. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  32. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  33. ENIAL OF AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  34. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  35. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  36. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  37. OTICE OF SERVICE SUPP INTERROGATORIES
  38. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  39. OTICE OF SERVICE SUPP INTERROGATORIES
  40. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  41. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: COHEN, RANDY MICHAEL
  42. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: PINELLAS PROVISION CORPORATION,
  43. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: PINELLAS PROVISION CORPORATION,
  44. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: PINELLAS PROVISION CORPORATION,
  45. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: COHEN, RANDY MICHAEL
  46. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: PINELLAS PROVISION CORPORATION,
  47. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: COHEN, RANDY MICHAEL
  48. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  49. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  50. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  51. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  52. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  53. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  54. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  55. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  56. ISCLOSURE
  57. ISCLOSURE
  58. TANDING ORDER ASSIGNING GENERAL CIVIL CASE TRACK
  59. OTICE OF FILING
  60. UMMONS - NOT ISSUED
  61. UMMONS - NOT ISSUED
  62. OMPLAINT WITH DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more