Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- FILE & ENTER PETITION
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
- LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- ORDER FOR HEARING
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE-SHERWOOD & ROBERT
- COURT REPORTER FEES
- AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- MO 6/27
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE-SHERWOOD AND ROBERT
- JOURNAL ENTRY
- MOTION TO ENFORE JOURNAL ENTRY BY DATE CERTAIN
- ORDER FOR HEARING
- ORDER
- CM -10-10; HEARING CONDUCTED; RULING MADE FROM BENCH; ORDER WITH DATES TO PRODUCE SIGNED
- MOTION OF LAUREN SLAPE BARNETT FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS
- ORDER FOR HEARING
- TRUSTEE'S RESPONSE TO LAUREN SLAPE BARNETT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF MICHAEL J ANDERSON, SHERWOOD & ROBERT, ON BEHALF OF LORI MCCOLLUM, DEFENDANT
- LAUREN SLAPE BARNETT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
- ORDER
- SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID A. WALLS
- REPLY IN SUPPORT OF LAUREN SLAPE BARNETT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS
- COURT MINUTE: COURT REPORTER: FILE B 1/01 ASANO169.DS2. RECORDING ARGUMENTS. PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS A-F. ATTY FEES AND COSTS HEARING CONDUCTED. PETITIONER MAKES ARGUMENT THAT THE LEGAL ACTIONS THAT SHE HAD TO SEEK WERE THE DIRECT FAULT OF THE RESPONDENT. PER PETITIONER, THE ACCOUNT TYPE ARE STILL NOT PRESENTED. TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. RESPONDENT HAS 14 DAYS TO RESPOND. PETITIONER HAS 10 DAYS TO REPLY. DK
- 6/19/25 COURT MINUTE: DAVID WALLS APPEARED FOR PETITIONER. HUGH ROBERT APPEARED FOR RESPONDENT FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS HEARING. THE COURT RULES BENEFICIARY OF TRUST IS ENTITLED TO ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS PER 60 O.S. § 175.57D. TRUSTEE TO PAY ATTY FEES AND COSTS NOT TRUST. TRUSTEE GRANTED 15 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER TO FILE RESPONSE TO AMOUNT. PETITIONER GRANTED ADDITIONAL 10 DAYS TO FILE REPLY. DK
- TRUSTEE'S SURREPLY TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF LAUREN SLAPE BARNETT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS.
- LAUREN SLAPE BARNETT'S POSITION ON THE REASONABLENESS OF ATTORNEY FEES
- MO; APPEARANCES: DAVID WALLS FOR PETITIONER: HUGH ROBERT. HEARING RULING ON ATTORNEY FEES. COURT AWARDS ATTORNEY FEES AS SUCH: ATTORNEY RATE OF $280 REASONABLE. PARALEGAL RATE OF $125 REASONABLE; TOTAL AMOUNT REDUCED BY 20% DUE TO SOME BLOCK BILLING. TOTAL ATTY FEES & COST AWARDED FEES. $25,848.27 AND COST $245.33. DK
- 6/20/25 JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF BENEFICIARY. DK
- 9/4/25 JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF BENEFICIARY. DK
- ###GARNISHMENT AFFIDAVIT
- ###GARNISHMENT SUMMONS ISSUED DIRECT
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
- APPLICATION FOR HEARING ON ASSETS
- NOTICE OF HEARING
- ORDER TO APPEAR AND ANSWER AS TO ASSETS AND FORBIDDING A TRANSFER OF OTHER DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY
- AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
- AMENDED ORDER TO APPEAR AND ANSWER AS TO ASSESTS AND FORBIDDING A TRANSFER OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY
- 1/8: MO, NO ONE PRESENT, SEE ATTACHED EMAIL, CASE SETTLED, DK.
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In