Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Polk County

Court

Polk County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-09-29
Type Nega Negligence Auto
Docket 56 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Maury, Lucia M
Defendant Rustand Jessecah P 405 Crane Street Sebring Fl 33870
Photo of Hon. Kelly P Butz

Judge

Hon. Kelly P Butz

Polk County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DEFENDANTS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN - GENERAL TRACK
  4. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS
  5. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK- JESSECAH P RUSTAND
  6. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK- AMBER RUSTAND
  7. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK- RICHARD RUSTAND
  8. ANSWER AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  9. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES FOR SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
  10. PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDNATS ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  11. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH INITIAL DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL
  12. PROCEDURE 1.280(A)
  13. PLAINTIFF LUCIA M MAURYS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTAND
  14. PLAINTIFF LUCIA M MAURYS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTAND
  15. PLAINTIFF LUCIA M MAURY NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTAND
  16. PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGAS NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT AMBER RUSTAND
  17. PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGAS NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT RICHARD RUSTAND
  18. PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGAS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT AMBER RUSTAND
  19. PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGAS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT RICHARD RUSTAND
  20. PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGAS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT AMBER RUSTAND
  21. PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGAS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT RICHARD RUSTAND
  22. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING AND SERVING INITIAL DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES
  23. DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTANDS NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF LUCIA M MAURY
  24. DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTANDS NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGA
  25. DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTANDS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF LUCIA M MAURY
  26. DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTANDS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGA
  27. DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTANDS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF LUCIA M MAURY
  28. DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTANDS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGA
  29. NOTICE OF TAKING AUDIOVISUALLY RECORDED DEPOSITION BY COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
  30. NOTICE OF TAKING AUDIOVISUALLY RECORDED DEPOSITION VIA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
  31. DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
  32. DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
  33. DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
  34. DEFENDANT AMBER RUSTAND'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  35. DEFENDANT RICHARD RUSTAND'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  36. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  37. DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  38. NOTICE OF ADMISSION OF FAULT
  39. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
  40. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
  41. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
  42. DEFENDANT JESSECAH RUSTAND RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  43. PLAINTIFF LUCIA M MAURY NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTAND INTERROGATORIES
  44. PLAINTIFF LUCIA MAURY RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT JESSICAH P RUSTAND FIRS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  45. PLAINTIFF LUCIA M MAURY RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTAND REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  46. PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGA NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTAND INTERROGATORIES
  47. PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGA RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTAND FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  48. PLAINTIFF JUAN A ORTEGA RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT JESSECAH P RUSTAND REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  49. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION TO NON PARTY
  50. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION TO NON PARTY
  51. PLAITNIFFS LUCIA M MAURY TO NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTY
  52. PLAINTIFFS JUAN A ORTEGA OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF PRODUCTION NON PARTY DATED DECEMBER 16 25
  53. AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING AUDIOVISUALLY RECORDED DEPOSITION BY COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
  54. AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING AUDIOVISUALLY RECORDED DEPOSITIONS VIA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
  55. SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING AUDIOVISUALLY RECORDED DEPOSITION VIA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
  56. PLAINTIFFS LUCIA M. MAURY AND JUAN A. ORTEGA'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PROPOSALS FOR SETTLEMENT TO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more