Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2026-02-02
Status INACTIVE
Type Commercial Docket
Docket 19 entries

Parties

Plaintiff One Source Technology, Llc Dba A Surint
Defendant Optix Llc
Photo of Hon. Cassandra Collier Williams

Judge

Hon. Cassandra Collier Williams

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59690285) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANDREW C. VOORHEES [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(59690284) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANDREW C. VOORHEES [email protected]
  4. THE COURT ACKNOWLEDGES PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FILED 02/18/2026. THEREFORE, THIS CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COSTS TO PLAINTIFF. FINAL. SO ORDERED. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. NOTICE FILED BY P1 ONE SOURCE TECHNOLOGY, LLC ATTORNEY ANDREW C. VOORHEES 0077955 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
  6. USPS RECEIPT NO. 59537860 DELIVERED BY USPS 02/09/2026 OPTIX LLC PROCESSED BY COC 02/18/2026.
  7. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 04/23/2026 AT 10:30 AM. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 978-990-5000 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 701774# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR FOR THIS CMC WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ANY ATTORNEY OR UNREPRESENTED PARTY WHO IS NOT AVAILABLE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED HIS/HER PARTICIPATION AND TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE CASE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. PRIOR TO THE CMC, PARTIES MUST EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(B)(3) AND DRAFT A PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN PURSUANT TO OHIO CIV. R. 26(F). COUNSEL SHALL FILE WITH THE COURT THE PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND NOTICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE CMC. IF THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO CONFER, PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE WITH THE COURT OF EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY COURT SCHEDULED EVENT IN THE FUTURE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT RENDERED AGAINST DEFENDANT. SO ORDERED. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 04/23/2026 AT 10:30 AM. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. SUMS COMPLAINT(59537860) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: OPTIX LLC 1811 BERING DR. STE: 400 HOUSTON, TX 77057
  9. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  10. WRIT FEE
  11. JUDGE LAUREN C MOORE ASSIGNED (RANDOM); COMMERCIAL DOCKET CASE, REASSIGNED TO JUDGE CASSANDRA COLLIER-WILLIAMS (RANDOM)
  12. JUDGE LAUREN C MOORE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  13. LEGAL RESEARCH
  14. LEGAL NEWS
  15. LEGAL AID
  16. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  17. COMPUTER FEE
  18. CLERK'S FEE
  19. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID ANDREW C. VOORHEES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more