Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-22
Type Civil Tort
Docket 55 entries
Disposition dismiss

Docket Entries

  1. ocument Transmitted
  2. rder Issued order granting in part motion to strike portion of appendices Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellees' Motion to Strike Portions of Appellant's Appendices and Brief is granted in part. 2. All materials in Appellant's Appendices that were not admitted for the jury's consideration and any references thereto in Appellant's Brief are ordered stricken from the record. 3. Appellees' Motion to Strike Appellant's Second Corrected Brief is denied. All panel judges concur. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew File Stamp: 11/14/2025
  3. ocument Transmitted
  4. ocuments returned from Court Administration Volumes of Exhibits 1
  5. lectronic Documents Received from Trial Court Clerk Volumes of Transcripts - Five (5) Volumes of Exhibits - Two (2) Volumes of T/C - One (1) Received Electronically 09/12/2025 Postmark: 09/12/2025
  6. eceived from Trial Court/Agency Clerk Volumes of Exhibits - One (1) Received By-Hand Delivered 09/16/2025 Postmark: 09/16/2025
  7. ase Fully Briefed Oral Argument Requested: No FB Date: 09/17/2025
  8. ransmitted to Court of Appeals
  9. ocuments released to Court Administration Volumes of Exhibits 1
  10. rial Court Clerk Notified to Transmit Transcript Date Sent: 09/12/2025
  11. ocument Transmitted
  12. rief - Appellant Reply Brief - Appellant Reply Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 09/10/25 Attorney: Rayman, Mathew Party: City of Indianapolis File Stamp: 09/10/2025
  13. rder Granting Motion for Extension of Time To File Brief order granting extension of time Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellant's Verified Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is granted as a final extension. 2. Appellant's Reply Brief is due on September 10, 2025. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: City of Indianapolis Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew File Stamp: 08/21/2025
  14. ocument Transmitted
  15. otion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 08/18/25 Attorney: Rayman, Mathew Party: City of Indianapolis File Stamp: 08/18/2025
  16. rief - Appellee Brief - Appellees - Alexander, et al. Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 08/11/25 Attorney: East, Rachel Party: Alexander, Jacki Party: Alexander, The Estate of Charles File Stamp: 08/11/2025
  17. rder Issued order granting extension of time Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellees' Motion to Strike Portions of Appellant's Appendices and Brief and Motion to Strike Appellant's Second Corrected Brief are held in abeyance to be addressed by the writing panel to which this case is assigned. 2. Personnel in the Office of the Administrator are directed to mark the docket to bring this order and Appellees' Motion to Strike Portions of Appellant's Appendices and Brief and Motion to Strike Appellant's Second Corrected Brief to the attention of the writing panel to which this case is assigned. 3. Appellees' Verified Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee Brief is granted. 4. Appellees' Brief is due on August 11, 2025. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew File Stamp: 06/25/2025
  18. ocument Transmitted
  19. otion for Extension of Time to File Brief Motion for Extension of Time - Appellee Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 06/23/25 Attorney: East, Rachel Party: Alexander, Jacki Party: Alexander, The Estate of Charles File Stamp: 06/23/2025
  20. otion to Strike Motion to Strike Second Amended Brief Appellant's Second Corrected Brief. Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 6/20/2025 Attorney: East, Rachel Party: Alexander, Jacki Party: Alexander, The Estate of Charles File Stamp: 06/20/2025
  21. rief - Appellant Brief - Appellant Brief - Appealed Order (Order Denying Cross Motions for Summary Judgment) Brief - Appealed Order (Agreed Amended Judgment) Brief - Appealed Order (Judgment Entry on Jury Verdict) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 06/18/25 Attorney: Rayman, Mathew Party: City of Indianapolis File Stamp: 06/18/2025
  22. otice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Appellant's Brief Party: City of Indianapolis Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew File Stamp: 06/18/2025
  23. otion to Strike Motion To Strike Portions Of Appellant's Appendices And Brief Portions of Appellant's Appendices and Brief Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 06/17/25 Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 06/17/25 Attorney: East, Rachel Party: Alexander, Jacki File Stamp: 06/17/2025
  24. ursuant to App.R. 23(D), Parties Notified of Filing Clerk Comments:Motion to Strike Portions of Appellant's Appendices and Brief Party: Alexander, Jacki Party: Alexander, The Estate of Charles Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew Sent Date: 06/19/2025
  25. ocument Transmitted
  26. ocument Transmitted
  27. otice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Appellant's Appendix Party: City of Indianapolis Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew File Stamp: 06/10/2025
  28. ocument Transmitted
  29. otice of Defect Issued Appellant's Corrected Brief Party: City of Indianapolis Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew Issue Date: 06/12/2025
  30. ocument Transmitted
  31. ppendix Filed Volumes of Appendices: Ten (10) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 06/10/25 Attorney: Rayman, Mathew Party: City of Indianapolis File Stamp: 06/10/2025
  32. orrected Entry Entry of Appellant's Appendix is corrected to Nine (9) Volumes tendered.
  33. ppendix Filed Volumes of Appendices: Nine (9) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 06/10/25 Attorney: Rayman, Mathew Party: City of Indianapolis File Stamp: 06/10/2025
  34. eceived Document Receive Date: 06/10/25 Appellant's Corrected Brief - Per A.R. 46(A)(12) Appealed Order/orders are to be SEPARATE attachments to the brief, not at the conclusion of the brief. PostmarkDate: 06/10/2025
  35. rder Granting Motion for Extension of Time To File Brief order granting extension of time Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellant's Verified Emergency Motion for Extension of Time and Motion for Leave to Amend Defects in Appellant's Brief are both granted as a final extension. 2. Within seven (7) days of the date of this order, Appellant is ordered to file a corrected brief and appendix. 3. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. 4. Appellees' Motion to Dismiss Appeal is denied. 5. Appellees' Brief is due within thirty (30) days of the date Appellant's corrected brief is filed. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: City of Indianapolis Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew File Stamp: 06/03/2025
  36. ocument Transmitted
  37. esponse Objection To Appellant's Belated Motion For Extension Of Time and Motion to Dismiss Appeal Objection to Appellant's Belated Motion for Extension of Time and Motion to Dismiss Appeal Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 05/28/25 Attorney: East, Rachel Party: Alexander, Jacki File Stamp: 05/28/2025
  38. eceived Document Receive Date: 05/28/25 Appellant's Brief - appears untimely. PostmarkDate: 05/28/2025
  39. ocument Filed Motion for Leave to Amend Brief to Correct Defects - Appellant Motion For Leave To Amend Defects In Appellant's Brief. Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 05/29/25 Attorney: Rayman, Mathew Party: City of Indianapolis File Stamp: 05/29/2025
  40. eceived Document Receive Date: 05/29/25 Appellant's Amended Brief - appears to have appealed orders included within brief. Hold for ruling on motion. PostmarkDate: 05/29/2025
  41. eceived Document Receive Date: 05/29/25 Appellant's Appendix - 1) appears to be untimely and, 2) Volume II Parts One and Two exceed the allowed page limit of 250 per volume. Additionally, once the 250 page limit is met an additional volumes or volumes shall be tendered. PostmarkDate: 05/29/2025
  42. ate & Defective Document Letter Issued Appellant's Appendix Party: City of Indianapolis Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew Issue Date: 05/30/2025
  43. otion for Extension of Time to File Brief Motion for Extension of Time (Emergency) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 05/27/25 Attorney: Rayman, Mathew Party: City of Indianapolis File Stamp: 05/27/2025
  44. ocument Transmitted
  45. rder Granting Motion for Extension of Time To File Brief order granting extension of time Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellant's Verified Motion for Second Extension of Time is granted as a final extension. 2. Appellant's Brief is due on May 27, 2025. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: City of Indianapolis Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew File Stamp: 05/08/2025
  46. ocument Transmitted
  47. otion for Extension of Time to File Brief Motion for 2nd Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief (Second) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 05/05/25 Attorney: Rayman, Mathew Party: City of Indianapolis File Stamp: 05/05/2025
  48. rder Granting Motion for Extension of Time To File Brief order granting extension of time Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellant's Verified Motion for First Extension of Time is granted. 2. Appellant's Brief is due on May 12, 2025. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: City of Indianapolis Serve: East, Rachel Serve: Rayman, Mathew File Stamp: 04/04/2025
  49. ocument Transmitted
  50. ppearance (Rachel A. East) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 04/02/25 Attorney: East, Rachel Party: Alexander, Jacki Party: Alexander, The Estate of Charles File Stamp: 04/02/2025
  51. otion for Extension of Time to File Brief Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 04/02/25 Attorney: Rayman, Mathew Party: City of Indianapolis File Stamp: 04/02/2025
  52. otice of Completion of Transcript Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 03/11/25 File Stamp: 03/11/2025
  53. otice of Completion of Clerk's Record Transcript Not Yet Completed Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/29/25 File Stamp: 01/29/2025
  54. otice of Appeal Filed Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/22/25 Attorney: Rayman, Mathew Party: City of Indianapolis File Stamp: 01/22/2025
  55. OA Service to Trial Court Sent Date: 01/22/2025

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more