Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Portage Co

Court

Portage Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-11-25
Status OPEN
Type Criminal (common Pleas)
Docket 32 entries

Parties

Defendant Osco, Nolan W
Photo of Hon. PITTMAN LAURIE J

Judge

Hon. PITTMAN LAURIE J

Portage County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. RDER WAS FAXED OR EMAILED TO: PROSECUTOR ADULT PROBATION PUBLIC DEFENDER
  2. ARRANT INFORMATION SHEET FILED.
  3. NSTRUCTIONS FILED. (SEE IMAGE)
  4. ERTIFIED COPY OF INDICTMENT & WARRANT ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF PORTAGE COUNTY.
  5. LERT ISSUED (C) WARRANT issued on: 11/25/2025 For: OSCO, NOLAN W
  6. OPY OF CERTIFICATE OF ASSIGNMENT FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO FOR HONORABLE W WYATT MCKAY FILED.
  7. RDER OF COMMITMENT, BOND AMOUNT AND CONDITIONS AND/OR TERMS OF PROBATION GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED (SEE IMAGE)
  8. ECOGNIZANCE OF ACCUSED FILED. BOND AMOUNT IS $10,000.00 PR W/CONDITIONS COMMON PLEAS RECOGNIZANCE BOND Sent on: 11/26/2025 09:30:41.61
  9. LERT SERVED (C) WARRANT served on: 11/26/2025 For: OSCO, NOLAN W
  10. EARING SCHEDULED: Event: ARRAIGNMENT Date: 12/01/2025 Time: 11:00 am Judge: PITTMAN, LAURIE J Location: COURTROOM #1
  11. EARING SCHEDULED: Event: STATUS CONFERENCE AND PRETRIAL Date: 01/06/2026 Time: 10:00 am Judge: PITTMAN, LAURIE J Location: COURTROOM #1
  12. EARING SCHEDULED: Event: CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL Date: 02/11/2026 Time: 10:00 am Judge: PITTMAN, LAURIE J Location: COURTROOM #1 Result: HEARING CANCELLED
  13. EARING SCHEDULED: Event: CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL Date: 02/18/2026 Time: 9:00 am Judge: PITTMAN, LAURIE J Location: COURTROOM #1 Result: HEARING CANCELLED
  14. ECOGNIZANCE OF ACCUSED FILED. BOND AMOUNT IS $75,000.00 PR. (SENT TO ADULT PROBATION AND MACS) COMMON PLEAS RECOGNIZANCE BOND Sent on: 12/01/2025 11:56:32.81
  15. UDGMENT ENTRY ARRAIGNMENT BOND SET AT $ 75,000.00 PR (SEE IMAGE)
  16. RDER WAS FAXED OR EMAILED TO: PROSECUTOR ADULT PROBATION PUBLIC DEFENDER ATTORNEY OF RECORD SHERIFF
  17. EFENDANT REQUESTED APPOINTED COUNSEL OR PUBLIC DEFENDER INDIGENCY FORM Sent on: 12/02/2025 10:17:55.80
  18. OTICE AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER GRANTED. (SEE IMAGE)
  19. UDGMENT ENTRY - DISCOVERY HEARING GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED (SEE IMAGE)
  20. OTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FILED. (SEE IMAGE) Attorney: PUBLIC DEFENDER ()
  21. EMAND FOR DISCOVERY FILED. Attorney: PUBLIC DEFENDER ()
  22. EQUEST FOR NOTICE OF INTENTION TO USE EVIDENCE FILED. Attorney: PUBLIC DEFENDER ()
  23. EFT'S RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY RESPONSE FILED. (SEE IMAGE) Attorney: PUBLIC DEFENDER ()
  24. ARRANT ON INDICTMENT RETURNED ENDORSED. PO CTY SHERIFF
  25. OTION FOR RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY FILED. Attorney: SALLERSON, DANIEL (65476)
  26. OPY OF CERTIFICATE OF ASSIGNMENT FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO FOR HONORABLE JUDGE W. WYATT MCKAY.
  27. RITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY GRANTED. (SEE IMAGE)
  28. UDGMENT ENTRY - PLEA HEARING, REFERRED TO ADULT PROBATION, BOND CONTINUED (SEE IMAGE)
  29. RDER WAS FAXED OR EMAILED TO: PROSECUTOR ADULT PROBATION PUBLIC DEFENDER
  30. AIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL GRANTED. (SEE IMAGE)
  31. AIVER OF TRIAL BY JURY GRANTED. (SEE IMAGE)
  32. UNC PRO TUNC JUDGMENT ENTRY - PLEA HEARING, REFERRED TO ADULT PROBATION, BOND CONTINUED (SEE IMAGE)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more