Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-04
Status CSO - CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
Type Cr Personal Injury Auto
Docket 44 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Jenkins Johnson, Zaiair|Al Rasul, Nahjee|Whittlesey, Jamal|Smith, Rosetta|S., A.
Defendant Coulter, Nichole
Photo of Hon. Wharton Ferris W

Judge

Hon. Wharton Ferris W

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. PRAECIPE FILED
  4. SUMMONS
  5. SUMMONS
  6. ANSWER FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES
  7. CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT
  8. WRIT ISSUED
  9. AFFIDAVIT FILED
  10. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT
  11. ANSWER
  12. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  13. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  14. LETTER
  15. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  16. STIPULATION
  17. ORDER
  18. AFFIDAVIT FILED DATE DOCKETED: JULY 26, 2025 ATTORNEY'S AFFIDAVIT REGARDING LONG ARM SERVICE EXHIBITS TO ATTORNEY'S AFFIDAVIT REGARDING LONG ARM SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 76714505
  19. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT
  20. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: JULY 26, 2025 AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 76714505
  21. ANSWER
  22. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: JULY 29, 2025 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT NICHOLE COULTER TO THE PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT OF DEFENDANT NICHOLE COULTER RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT NICHOLE COULTER TO FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 76734308
  23. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  24. NOTICE OF SERVICE DATE DOCKETED: JULY 29, 2025 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT'S INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION AND REQUEST FOR ALL BOARDABLE EXPENSES DIRECTED TO THE PLAINTIFFS' ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 76734728
  25. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  26. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 8, 2025
  27. LETTER
  28. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 31, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: WHARTON, FERRIS W LETTER FROM JUDGE WHARTON TO COUNSEL SETTING SCHEDULING TELECONFERENCE FOR JANUARY 21, 2026 AT 2:00 P.M. ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 78090144
  29. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  30. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 23, 2026 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD ON 1-21-26; PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 7-6-27 AT 9:00 AM; 7-26-27 3-DAY JURY TRIAL AT 9:30 AM ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 78262079
  31. STIPULATION
  32. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 29, 2026 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 78303153
  33. ORDER
  34. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 30, 2026 ORDER SIGNED BY: WHARTON, FERRIS W SO ORDERED (STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE) ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 78329707

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more