Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-07
Status CSO - CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
Type L 3 Mortgage Mediation
Docket 44 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Citizens Bank, N.a.
Defendant Gutierrez, Ezequiel
Photo of Hon. Rennie Sheldon K

Judge

Hon. Rennie Sheldon K

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. MOTION
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. ANSWER
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. WRIT ISSUED
  6. MEDIATION SCHEDULING NOTICE
  7. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  8. ANSWER
  9. CONTINUING MEDIATION RECORD
  10. CONTINUING MEDIATION RECORD
  11. FINAL MEDIATION RECORD
  12. PROOF OF MAILING RULE 4(F)(4)
  13. AFFIDAVIT LOSS MITIGATION
  14. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  15. NOTICE
  16. RSP MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  17. NOTICE
  18. NOTICE
  19. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  20. FINAL MORTGAGE MEDIATION RECORD DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 22, 2025 FINAL MEDIATION RECORD. THE MEDIATION PROCESS WAS UNSUCCESSFUL BECAUSE THE PARTIES FAILED TO COME TO AGREEMENT. THE FORECLOSURE ACTION MAY PROCEED. MEDIATION FEE: NOT REQUIRED. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77837704
  21. PROOF OF MAILING RULE 4(F)(4)
  22. PROOF OF MAILING AND POSTING PURSUANT TO SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULE 4(F)(4) FILED DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 4, 2025 AFFIDAVIT OF JANET Z. CHARLTON - PROOF OF MAILING - RULE 4(F)(4) EXHIBIT A - NOTICE TO LIENHOLDERS EXHIBIT B - DECLARATION OF MAILING EXHIBIT C - USPS TRACKING INFORMATION EXHIBIT D - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77889939
  23. AFFIDAVIT LOSS MITIGATION
  24. AFFIDAVIT LOSS MITIGATION DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 4, 2025 AFFIDAVIT OF LOSS MITIGATION ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77890036
  25. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  26. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 10, 2026 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO BE HEARD VIA COURTSCRIBES ON THURSDAY, MARCH 26, 2026 AT 9:00 A.M. EXHIBIT A - AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT EXHIBIT B - SCRA SEARCHES PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78159239
  27. NOTICE
  28. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 23, 2026 PRO SE LITIGANT'S NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RESPONSES FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026 PRO SE LITIGANT'S DISCOVERY REQUEST FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78265492
  29. RSP MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  30. RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 23, 2026 PRO SE LITIGANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026. PRO SE LITIGANT'S EXHIBITS A - B FILED IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026. PRO SE LITIGANT'S EXHIBITS C - F FILED IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026. PRO SE LITIGANT'S EXHIBIT G FILED IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026. PRO SE LITIGANT'S EXHIBIT H IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026. PRO SE LITIGANT'S AFFIDAVIT OF JOSEPH R. ESQUIVEL, JR. FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026. PRO SE LITIGANT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DISCOVERY FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78265492
  31. NOTICE
  32. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: FEBRUARY 3, 2026 ORDER SIGNED BY: RENNIE, SHELDON DUPLICATE COPY OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026, RECEIVED ON JAN. 27, 2026, VIA CERT MAIL: 702 1600 0001 8094 9138, AND RETURNED TO SENDER VIA USPS 1ST CLASS MAIL ON FEB. 2, 2026, WITH NOTICE OF IMPROPER FILING. ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 78361763
  33. NOTICE
  34. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: FEBRUARY 3, 2026 ORDER SIGNED BY: RENNIE, SHELDON DUPLICATE COPY OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON JAN. 21, 2026, RECEIVED ON JAN. 27, 2026, VIA CERT MAIL: 702 1600 0001 8094 9138, AND RETURNED TO SENDER VIA USPS 1ST CLASS MAIL ON FEB. 2, 2026, WITH NOTICE OF IMPROPER FILING. ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 78361782

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more