Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-04-01
Status CLOSED
Type Small Claims $2501 $5000
Docket 9 entries
Disposition disposal

Parties

Plaintiff Torre, Michelle
Defendant Smith Bellamy, Rose|Moye, Lance Edward
Photo of Hon. Janesk Kenneth James Ii

Judge

Hon. Janesk Kenneth James Ii

Putnam County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. HEARING MINUTES: PL AND ATTY PRESENT/DEF AND ATTY PRESENT; WITNESS FOR PL: MICHELLE TORRE WINKLER - S/T JOHN HENRY WINKLER JR - S/T EVIDENCE FOR PL: COMPOSITE PHOTOS OF SHOWER (A:1) COPY OF RECEIPT FROM LOWES (B:2) COMPOSITE OF PHOTOS OF BATHROOM (C:3) COMPOSITE OF BATHROOM VIDEOS (D:4) WITNESS FOR DEF: LANCE EDWARD MOYE - S/T EVIDENCE FOR DEF: ESTIMATE (A:1) SECOND ESTIMATE (B:2) RULE OF SEQUESTRAION INVOKED BY THE DEFENDANT. COURT STRIKES ANY TESTIMONY AND LIKEWISE INDICATING THE DEFENDANTS UNPROFESSIONALISM AND CONSCIENCIOUSNESS - NO CHARACTER WITNESSES NECESSARY. CASE TAKEN UNDER ADVISENENT - JUDGE TO SEND ORDER.
  2. Compliance Evidence - Disposal has been created
  3. NOTICE OF EXHIBIT DISPOSAL EMAIL TO ALL PARTIES
  4. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  5. MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO SUBMIT FACT INFORMATION SHEET
  6. FINAL JUDGMENT
  7. FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPLICATION OF THE LAW FOLLOWING NON-JURY TRIAL
  8. EXHIBIT LIST - DEFENDANT
  9. EXHIBIT LIST - PLAINTIFF

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more