Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-24
Status NEW - NEW
Type Ch Declaratory Judgment
Docket 57 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Decimal Digital Management | Decimal Digital Currency I | Decimal Digital Currency I | Mclaughlin Jr., John D
Defendant Sovereign Power, Inc.
Photo of Hon. Rennie Sheldon K

Judge

Hon. Rennie Sheldon K

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING DECLARATORY JUDGMT
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  5. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  6. MOTION
  7. ORDER
  8. NOTICE
  9. NOTICE
  10. LETTER
  11. RSP MOTION DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  12. MOTION
  13. NOTICE OF HEARING
  14. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  15. MOTION
  16. NOTICE
  17. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  18. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  19. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  20. MOTION TO DISMISS
  21. NOTICE
  22. RSP MOTION TO DISMISS
  23. MOTION
  24. MOTION DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 19, 2025 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 76871858
  25. NOTICE OF HEARING
  26. NOTICE OF HEARING DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 23, 2025 RE-NOTICE OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE (TO BE PRESENTED ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2025 AT 9:00 A.M.) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TO RE-NOTICE OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 76893128
  27. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  28. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 3, 2025 PRO SE DEFENDANT, KYNARVIS CLARK'S LETTER TO THE COURT RE: LEIN STATUS RECEIVED ON AUG. 29, 2025, FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON SEPT. 2, 2025. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 76974805
  29. MOTION
  30. MOTION DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 PRO SE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE EXTEND TIME TO RETAIN COUNSEL RECEIVED ON SEPT. 5, 2025 AND FILED CONVENTIONALLY. PRO SE DEFENDANT'S [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDNAT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE EXTEND TIME FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON SEPT. 5, 2025. NOTICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE EXTEND TIME TO RETAIN COUNSEL TO BE HEARD AT THE CONVENIENCE OF THE COURT FILED CONVENTIONALLY ON SEPT. 5, 2025. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77041206
  31. NOTICE
  32. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2025 NOTICE TO APPEAR ON SEPT. 18, 2025, 9:30 AM CIVIL MOTION CALENDAR (COURTSCRIBES) BEFORE JUDGE RENNIE WITH PARTICIPATION DETAILS FOR PRO SE DEFENDANT EMAILED ON SEPT. 17, 2025, WITH CONFIRMATION OF DELIVERY ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77097551
  33. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  34. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 19, 2025 JUDICIAL PROCEEDING WORKSHEET FOR THURS. SEPT. 18, 2025, 9:30 AM PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE BEFORE JDG. RENNIE. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED, - JDG. RENNIE. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77104443
  35. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  36. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 24, 2025 AMENDED COMPLAINT REDLINE VERSION OF AMENDED COMPLAINT EXHIBIT 1 TO AMENDED COMPLAINT EXHIBIT 2 TO AMENDED COMPLAINT EXHIBIT 3 TO AMENDED COMPLAINT EXHIBIT 4 TO AMENDED COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77422849
  37. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  38. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 1, 2025 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF CHARLES J. BROWN, III, ESQ., ON BEHALF OF SOVEREIGN POWER, INC. AND GRIDLINE DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE LLC, WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77499478
  39. MOTION TO DISMISS
  40. MOTION TO DISMISS DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 14, 2025 DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77746806
  41. NOTICE
  42. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 18, 2025 NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77766440
  43. RSP MOTION TO DISMISS
  44. RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 4, 2025 PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE) ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 77904062

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more