Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-10-10
Status NEW - NEW
Type Cr Personal Injury Auto
Docket 103 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Williams, Andrea|A Minor Child, P.j.
Defendant Brown, Sr., Maurice|Smagala, Jr., Michael|Holloman, Dielle|City Of Wilmington|Wilmington Police Department|Cannon, Justin|Wilkers, Justin
Photo of Hon. Rennie Sheldon K

Judge

Hon. Rennie Sheldon K

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. WRIT ISSUED
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. PET: APPOINTMENT NEXT FRIEND
  4. WRIT ISSUED
  5. ORDER
  6. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  7. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  8. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  9. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  10. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  11. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  12. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  13. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  14. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  15. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  16. ALIAS PRAECIPE FILED
  17. WRIT ISSUED
  18. ANSWER
  19. MOTION TO DISMISS
  20. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  21. PROPOSED ORDER
  22. RESPONSE
  23. NOTICE
  24. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  25. LETTER
  26. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  27. REPLY BRIEF FILED
  28. LETTER
  29. MOTION
  30. PROPOSED ORDER
  31. NOTICE
  32. EXHIBITS
  33. MOTION
  34. PROPOSED ORDER
  35. NOTICE
  36. EXHIBITS
  37. LETTER
  38. ORDER
  39. ORDER
  40. LETTER
  41. EXHIBITS
  42. STIPULATION
  43. ORDER
  44. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  45. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  46. PLURIES PRAECIPE
  47. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  48. NOTICE OF SERVICE DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 17, 2025 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78000134
  49. LETTER
  50. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 17, 2025 LETTER TO JUDGE RENNIE ENCLOSING THE PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78000237
  51. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  52. WRIT RETURNED: DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 17, 2025 NON EST INVENTUS MAURICE BROWN, SR. NON EST INVENTUS ON 12-11-2025 AT 09:57, SEE SHERIFF DEPUTY'S NOTES FOR DETAILS ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78009114
  53. REPLY BRIEF FILED
  54. REPLY BRIEF FILED DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 25, 2025 REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS MICHAEL SMAGALA, JR., DIELLE HOLLOMAN, AND CITY OF WILMINGTON IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78063200
  55. LETTER
  56. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 1, 2026 LETTER TO JUDGE RENNIE ENCLOSING A COURTESY COPY OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SERVICE BY ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO DEFENDANT MAURICE BROWN, SR. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78104531
  57. MOTION
  58. MOTION DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 1, 2026 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SERVICE BY ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO DEFENDANT MAURICE BROWN, SR. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78104597
  59. PROPOSED ORDER
  60. PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 1, 2026 PROPOSED ORDER ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78104597
  61. NOTICE
  62. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 1, 2026 NOTICE OF MOTION TO BE HEARD AT THE CONVENIENCE OF THE COURT. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78104597
  63. EXHIBITS
  64. EXHIBITS DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 1, 2026 EXHIBITS ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78104597
  65. MOTION
  66. MOTION DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 1, 2026 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE (MAURICE BROWN, SR) ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78104714
  67. PROPOSED ORDER
  68. PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 1, 2026 PROPOSED ORDER ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78104714
  69. NOTICE
  70. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 1, 2026 NOTICE OF MOTION TO BE HEARD AT THE CONVENIENCE OF THE COURT. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78104714
  71. EXHIBITS
  72. EXHIBITS DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 1, 2026 EXHIBITS ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78104714
  73. LETTER
  74. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 1, 2026 LETTER TO JUDGE RENNIE ENCLOSING A COURTESY COPY OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78104759
  75. ORDER
  76. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 29, 2026 ORDER SIGNED BY: RENNIE, SHELDON SO ORDERED, PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE IS GRANTED. - JDG. RENNIE. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78323233
  77. ORDER
  78. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 29, 2026 ORDER SIGNED BY: RENNIE, SHELDON SO ORDERED, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO SERVE 120 DAYS IS GRANTED. - JDG. RENNIE. ACCEPTED BY: ERM TRANSACTION ID: 78323251

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more